Spin-photon dynamics of quantum dots in two-mode cavities

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 70, Issue 20, 2004, Pages

  Meier, Florian ^a   Awschalom, David D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DYNAMICS; ENERGY; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; MOLECULAR MODEL; PHOTON; POLARIZATION; QUANTUM DOT;

EID: 42749103659     PISSN: 01631829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.205329     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. D. Loss and D. P. DiVincenzo, Phys. Rev. A 57, 120 (1998).
2. S. A. Wolf, D. D. Awschalom, R. A. Buhrman, J. M. Daughton, S. von Molnár, M. L. Roukes, A. Y. Chtchelkanova, and D. M. Treger, Science 294, 1488 (2001).
3. A. Imamoḡlu, D. D. Awschalom, G. Burkard, D. P. DiVincenzo, D. Loss, M. Sherwin, and A. Small, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4204 (1999).
4. A. Imamoḡlu, Fortschr. Phys. 48, 987 (2000).
5. E. Pazy, E. Biolatti, T. Calarco, I. D'Amico, P. Zanardi, F. Rossi, and P. Zoller, Europhys. Lett. 62, 175 (2003).
6. P. Chen, C. Piermarocchi, L. J. Sham, D. Gammon, and D. G. Steel, Phys. Rev. B 69, 075320 (2004).
7. M. Leuenberger, M. Flatté, and D. D. Awschalom, cond-mat/0407499 (unpublished).
8. A. Kiraz, C. Reese, B. Gayral, L. Zhang, W. V. Schoenfeld, B. D. Gerardot, P. M. Petroff, E. L. Hu, and A. Imamoḡlu, J. Opt. B: Quantum Semiclassical Opt. 5, 129 (2003).
9. J. Vučković and Y. Yamamoto, Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 2374 (2003).
10. R. R. Puri, Mathematical Methods of Quantum Optics (Springer, New York, 2001).
11. J. L. Park, Found. Phys. 1, 23 (1970).
12. E. Knill, R. Laflamme, and G. J. Milburn, Nature (London) 409, 46 (2001).
13. A. L. Efros, Phys. Rev. B 46, 7448 (1992).
14. +〉 are omitted.
15. J. M. Raimond, M. Brune, and S. Haroche, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 565 (2001).
16. B. B. Blinov, D. L. Moehring, L.-M. Duan, and C. Monroe, Nature (London) 428, 153 (2004).
17. B. Sun, M. S. Chapman, and L. You, Phys. Rev. A 69, 042316 (2004).
18. R.-B. Liu, W. Yao, and L. J. Sham, cond-mat/0408148 (unpublished).
19. For simplicity, we denote photons propagating along directions 1 and 2 outside the cavity with the same symbols as the corresponding cavity modes. It is understood that, for t → ∞, photons always occupy propagating modes outside the cavity.
20. S. J. van Enk, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 4293 (1997).
21. W. Lange and H. J. Kimble, Phys. Rev. A 61, 063817 (2000).
22. +〉)/√2.
23. C. H. Bennett, H. J. Bernstein, S. Popescu, and B. Schumacher, Phys. Rev. A 53, 2046 (1996).
24. W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2245 (1998).
25. 2〉, respectively.
26. The level scheme is determined by the QD shape anisotropy. See Al. L. Efros and A. V. Rodina, Phys. Rev. B 47, 10 005 (1993).
27. 2), respectively.
28. C. Wildfeuer and D. H. Schiller, Phys. Rev. A 67, 053801 (2003).
29. V. Kuzmiak and A. A. Maradudin, Phys. Rev. B 57, 15 242 (1998).
30. V. Kuzmiak and A. A. Maradudin, Phys. Rev. B 61, 10 750 (2000).
31. N. Stojić, J. Glimm, Y. Deng, and J. W. Haus, Phys. Rev. E 64, 056614 (2001).
32. d is typically different for TE and TM modes.
33. A. F. Matthews, S. F. Mingaleev, and Y. S. Kivshar, Int. J. Laser Phys. 14, 631 (2004).
34. d, at least two additional parameters can be varied to find such a point, namely the radius of the holes in the triangular photonic crystal and the dielectric constants of the background material.
35. P. R. Villeneuve, S. Fan, and J. D. Joannopoulos, Phys. Rev. B 54, 7837 (1996).
36. A. Ekimov, F. Hache, M. C. Schanne-Klein, D. Ricard, C. Flytzanis, I. A. Kudryavtsev, T. V. Yazeva, A. V. Rodina, and A. L. Efros, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 10, 100 (1993).
37. S. A. Empedocles, D. J. Norris, and M. G. Bawendi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3873 (1996).
38. T. Flissikowski, I. A. Akimov, A. Hundt, and F. Henneberger, Phys. Rev. B 68, 161309(R) (2003).