Scaling and transition structure dependence on the fluid viscosity ratio in the selective withdrawal transition

Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics

Volumn 70, Issue 2 2, 2004, Pages

  Cohen, Itai ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; GLYCEROL; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PHASE INTERFACES; PHASE TRANSITIONS; PIPE FLOW; REYNOLDS NUMBER; STRESSES; SURFACE ACTIVE AGENTS; SURFACE TENSION; THERMODYNAMIC PROPERTIES; VISCOMETERS;

DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS; FLUID VISCOSITY RATIOS; IMMISCIBLE FLUIDS; TRANSITION STRUCTURES;

VISCOSITY;

EID: 42749103444     PISSN: 15393755     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.70.026302     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. H. E. Edgerton, E. A. Hauser, and W. B. Tucker, J. Appl. Phys. 41, 1209 (1937).
2. R. E. Caflisch and G. C. Papanicolaou, in Singularities in Fluids, Plasmas, and Optics (Kluwer, Norwell, MA, 1993).
3. A. L. Bertozzi, M. P. Brenner, T. F. Dupont, and L. P. Kadanoff, Trends and Perspectives in Applied Mathematics (Springer, New York, 1994).
4. R. E. Goldstein, A. I. Pesci, and M. J. Shelley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3043 (1993).
5. M. Pugh and M. J. Shelley, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 51, 733 (1998).
6. J. Eggers, Rev. Mod. Phys. 69, 865 (1997).
7. X. D. Shi, M. P. Brenner, and S. R. Nagel, Science 265, 219 (1994).
8. D. H. Peregrine, G. Shoker, and A. Symon, J. Fluid Mech. 212, 25 (1990).
9. I. Cohen and S. R. Nagel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 074501 (2002).
10. G. I. Barenblatt, Scaling, Self-Similarity and Intermediate Asymptotics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1996).
11. J. R. Lister and H. A. Stone, Phys. Fluids 10, 2758 (1998).
12. I. Cohen and S. R. Nagel, Phys. Fluids 13, 3533 (2001).
13. I. Cohen, H. Li, J. L. Hougland, M. Mrksich, and S. R. Nagel, Science 292, 265 (2001).
14. A. Acrivos and T. S. Lo, J. Fluid Mech. 86, 641 (1978).
15. J. T. Jeong and H. K. Moffatt, J. Fluid Mech. 241, 1 (1992).
16. J. Eggers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4290 (2001).
17. E. Lorenceau, F. Restagno, and D. Quere, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 184501 (2003).
18. G. H. Jirka and D. S. Katavola, J. Hydraul. Res. 17, 53 (1979).
19. D. F. Harelman, R. L. Morgan, and R. A. Purple, in Proceedings of the 8th Congress Int. Assoc. Hydraulic Res. (1959), pp. 10-C-1-10-C-16.
20. H. Rouse, J. Hydraul. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 82, 1038.3 (1956).
21. P. Gariel, Houille Blanche 4, 56 (1949).
22. A. Craya, Houille Blanche 4, 44 (1949).
23. M. Muskat, Physical Principles of Oil Production (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1972).
24. S. Blake and G. N. Ivey, J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 27, 153 (1986).
25. J. R. Lister, J. Fluid Mech. 198, 231 (1989).
26. J. B. Segur and H. E. Oberstar, Ind. Eng. Chem. 43, 2117 (1951).
27. A. W. Neumann and J. K. Spelt, Applied Surface Thermodynamics (Marcel-Dekker, New York, 1995).
28. F. K. Hansen and G. Rodsrud, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 141, 1 (1991).
29. D. Quere, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 31, 347 (1999).
30. W. W. Zhang (private communication).
31. w) of the PDMS is about 31 000, the distribution is broad and 5% by weight of the chains have a molecular weight of 200 000. Furthermore, even higher molecular weight polymers may be present at concentrations lower than 5% by weight and cannot be detected due to the limitations of this technique.
32. D. F. James and K. Walters, Techniques of Rheological Measurement (Elsevier, New York, 1994).
33. A. M. Ganan-Calvo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 285 (1998).
34. J. D. Sherwood, J. Fluid Mech. 144, 281 (1984).
35. R. A. de Bruijn, Chem. Eng. Sci. 48, 277 (1993).
36. 2.
37. The definition is made ambiguous since there are a number of velocity gradients characteristic of the flows near the stagnation point at the hump tip.
38. It is well known that inertial stresses, which dominate when very low viscosity fluids are used to conduct the selective withdrawal experiments, cannot produce humps of significant height or curvature.