Mechanism of high-temperature superconductivity in a striped Hubbard model

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 69, Issue 21, 2004, Pages

  Arrigoni, E ^a,b   Fradkin, E ^c   Kivelson, S A ^d  

^a GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONDUCTANCE; DENSITY; ELECTRON; HIGH TEMPERATURE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL;

EID: 42749101351     PISSN: 01631829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.214519     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. J. G. Bednorz and K. A. Müller, Z. Phys. B: Condens. Matter 64, 189 (1986).
2. R. Brout, Phys. Rev. 118, 1009 (1960).
3. For a review, with extensive references to the original literature, see E. W. Carlson, V. J. Emery, S. A. Kivelson, and D. Orgad, in "The Physics of Conventional and Unconventional Superconductors" edited by K. H. Bennemann and J. B. Ketterson (Springer-Verlag, in press), arXiv:cond-mat/ 0206217. In particular, this paper reviews reasons to believe that the BCS mechanism does not produce HTC reviews the numerical searches for superconductivity in the uniform t-J and Hubbard models, reviews the relevant aspects of the theory of the 1D electron gas, especially the LE liquid, and issues concerning the compertition between CDW and SC order in quasi-1D systems.
4. H. Tsunetsugu, M. Troyer, and T. M. Rice, Phys. Rev. B 51, 16 456 (1995), studied arrays of two-leg t-J ladders as a way to understand the physics of the translationally invariant 2D system. Although the model they studied nominally conrresponds to the period 2 case we discuss below, and some of their discussion prefigures the present analysis, the questions asked by these authors were quite different. In particular, they did not consider the mechanism of superconductivity in inhomogeneous 2D systems which we discuss here.
5. c,+.
6. R. M. Noack, S. R. White, and D. J. Scalapino, Phys. Rev. B 56, 7162 (1997).
7. T. Siller, M. Troyer, T. M. Rice, and S. R. White, Phys. Rev. B 63, 195106 (2001).
8. For a review of the theory of two-leg ladders, see E. Dagotto and T. M. Rice, Science 271, 618 (1996); C. Wu, W. V. Liu, and E. Fradkin, Phys. Rev. B 68, 115104 (2003).
9. For a review of the theory of two-leg ladders, see E. Dagotto and T. M. Rice, Science 271, 618 (1996); C. Wu, W. V. Liu, and E. Fradkin, Phys. Rev. B 68, 115104 (2003).
10. L. Balents and M. P. A. Fisher, Phys. Rev. B 53, 12 133 (1996); H. J. Schulz, ibid. 53, R2959 (1996).
11. L. Balents and M. P. A. Fisher, Phys. Rev. B 53, 12 133 (1996); H. J. Schulz, ibid. 53, R2959 (1996).
12. V. J. Emery, S. A. Kivelson, and O. Zachar, Phys. Rev. B 59, 15641 (1999).
13. A. Luther and V. J. Emery, Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 589 (1974).
14. K. Park and S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. B 65, 121304 (2002).
15. M. Vojta and S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. B 83, 3916 (1999).
16. S. A. Kivelson, E. Fradkin, and V. J. Emery, Nature (London) 393, 550 (1998).
17. V. J. Emery, E. Fradkin, S. A. Kivelson, and T. C. Lubensky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2160 (2000).
18. E. W. Carlson, D. Orgad, S. A. Kivelson, and V. J. Emery, Phys. Rev. B 62, 3422 (2000).
19. D. J. Scalapino, Y. Imry, and P. Pincus, Phys. Rev. B 11, 2042 (1975).
20. This mechanism bears a family resemblance to the interlayer tunneling mechanism of S. Chakravarty, A. Sudbø, P. W. Anderson, and S. Strong, Science 261, 337 (1993), although many aspects are quite different.
21. This mechanism is also related to the original resonating valence bond ideas of P. W. Anderson, Science 235, 1196 (1987); S. A. Kivelson, D. Rokhsar, and J. P. Sethna, Phys. Rev. B 35, 865 (1987), in that the pairing correlations (and scale) are inherited from the correlated insulator.
22. This mechanism is also related to the original resonating valence bond ideas of P. W. Anderson, Science 235, 1196 (1987); S. A. Kivelson, D. Rokhsar, and J. P. Sethna, Phys. Rev. B 35, 865 (1987), in that the pairing correlations (and scale) are inherited from the correlated insulator.
23. S. R. White, R. M. Noack, and D. J. Scalapino, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 886 (1994); S. Chakravarty, ibid. 77, 4446 (1996).
24. S. R. White, R. M. Noack, and D. J. Scalapino, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 886 (1994); S. Chakravarty, ibid. 77, 4446 (1996).
25. c, at which it vanishes.
26. H. J. Schulz, Phys. Rev. B 59, 2471 (1999).
27. E. Fradkin and S. A. Kivelson, Mod. Phys. Lett. B 4, 225 (1990); E. Fradkin, Field Theories of Condensed Matter Systems (Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, 1991), Chap. 6.
28. E. Fradkin and S. A. Kivelson, Mod. Phys. Lett. B 4, 225 (1990); E. Fradkin, Field Theories of Condensed Matter Systems (Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, 1991), Chap. 6.
29. N. Read and S. Sachdev, Nucl. Phys. B 316, 609 (1989).
30. E. Arrigoni and S. A. Kivelson, Phys. Rev. B 68, 180503 (2003).
31. s/J∼1, no interesting renormalizations are possible.
32. D. S. Fisher and P. C. Hohenberg, Phys. Rev. B 37, 4936 (1988).
33. E. Orignac and T. Giamarchi, Phys. Rev. B 56, 7167 (1997).
34. S. Chakravarty, M. Gelfand, and S. A. Kivelson, Science 254, 970 (1991).
35. V. J. Emery, S. A. Kivelson, and O. Zachar, Phys. Rev. B 56, 6120 (1997).
36. A model of an inhomogeneous strongly correlated system with attractive interactions was studied in MFT by I. Martin, G. Ortiz, A. V. Balatsky, and A. R. Bishop, Europhys. Lett. 56, 849 (2001), and an inhomogeneous t-J model with magnetic anisotropy was studied numerically in small systems by J. Eroles, G. Ortiz, A. V. Balatsky, and A. R. Bishop, Europhys. Lett. 50, 540 (2000).
37. A model of an inhomogeneous strongly correlated system with attractive interactions was studied in MFT by I. Martin, G. Ortiz, A. V. Balatsky, and A. R. Bishop, Europhys. Lett. 56, 849 (2001), and an inhomogeneous t-J model with magnetic anisotropy was studied numerically in small systems by J. Eroles, G. Ortiz, A. V. Balatsky, and A. R. Bishop, Europhys. Lett. 50, 540 (2000).
38. S. Sorella, G. B. Martins, F. Becca, C. Gazza, L. Capriotti, A. Parolla and E. Dagotto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 117002 (2002); S. Sorella, A. Parola, F. Becca, L. Capriotti, C. Gazza, E. Dagotto and G. Martins, ibid. 89, 279703 (2003); M. Calandra and S. Sorella, Phys. Rev. B 61, R11894 (2000).
39. S. Sorella, G. B. Martins, F. Becca, C. Gazza, L. Capriotti, A. Parolla and E. Dagotto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 117002 (2002); S. Sorella, A. Parola, F. Becca, L. Capriotti, C. Gazza, E. Dagotto and G. Martins, ibid. 89, 279703 (2003); M. Calandra and S. Sorella, Phys. Rev. B 61, R11894 (2000).
40. S. Sorella, G. B. Martins, F. Becca, C. Gazza, L. Capriotti, A. Parolla and E. Dagotto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 117002 (2002); S. Sorella, A. Parola, F. Becca, L. Capriotti, C. Gazza, E. Dagotto and G. Martins, ibid. 89, 279703 (2003); M. Calandra and S. Sorella, Phys. Rev. B 61, R11894 (2000).
41. S. Zhang, J. Carlson, and J. Gubernatis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 4486 (1997); T. K. Lee, C. T. Shih, Y. C. Chen, and H. Q. Lin, ibid. 89, 279702 (2003); C. T. Shih, Y. C. Chen, H. Q. Lin, and T. K. Lee, ibid. 81, 1294 (1998).
42. S. Zhang, J. Carlson, and J. Gubernatis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 4486 (1997); T. K. Lee, C. T. Shih, Y. C. Chen, and H. Q. Lin, ibid. 89, 279702 (2003); C. T. Shih, Y. C. Chen, H. Q. Lin, and T. K. Lee, ibid. 81, 1294 (1998).
43. S. Zhang, J. Carlson, and J. Gubernatis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 4486 (1997); T. K. Lee, C. T. Shih, Y. C. Chen, and H. Q. Lin, ibid. 89, 279702 (2003); C. T. Shih, Y. C. Chen, H. Q. Lin, and T. K. Lee, ibid. 81, 1294 (1998).
44. L. Pryadko, S. A. Kivelson, and O. Zachar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 067002 (2004).
45. M. Granath, V. Oganesyan, S. A. Kivelson, E. Fradkin, and V. J. Emery, Phys. Rev. B 87, 167011 (2001).
46. S. Sachdev, Physica A 313, 252 (2002), and references therein.
47. T. Schultz, D. C. Mattis, and E. Lieb, Rev. Mod. Phys. 36, 856 (1964).
48. R. Gupta and C. F. Baillie, Phys. Rev. B 45, 2883 (1992).
49. E. Fradkin and L. Susskind, Phys. Rev. D 17, 2637 (1978).
50. C. J. Hamer, J. B. Kogut, and L. Susskind, Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 1337 (1978).
51. C. J. Hamer and J. B. Kogut, Phys. Rev. B 20, 3859 (1979).
52. E. W. Carlson, S. A. Kivelson, V. J. Emery, and E. Manousakis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 612 (1999).