Critical role of flow-modified permittivity in electrorheology: Model and computer simulation

Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics

Volumn 69, Issue 2 1, 2004, Pages

  Dassanayake, Ujitha M ^a   Offner, Stella S R ^b   Hu, Yue ^b  

^a BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WELLESLEY COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEFORMATION; ELECTRIC FIELD EFFECTS; ELECTRODES; HYDRODYNAMICS; MICROSTRUCTURE; PERMITTIVITY; SHEAR FLOW; SUSPENSIONS (FLUIDS); VACUUM;

CHAIN STRUCTURES; ELECTRORHEOLOGY (ER); FLOW-MODIFIED PERMITTIVITY (FMP); MASON NUMBERS;

RHEOLOGY;

EID: 42749100978     PISSN: 1063651X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.021507     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. W.M. Winslow, J. Appl. Phys. 20, 1137 (1949).
2. H. Block and J.P. Kelly, J. Phys. D 21, 1661 (1988).
3. M. Parthasarathy and D.J. Klingenberg, Mater. Sci. Eng. 17, 57 (1996).
4. A.P. Gast and C.F. Zukoski, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 30, 153 (1989).
5. J.E. Martin and R.A. Anderson, J. Chem. Phys. 104, 4814 (1996).
6. D. Adolf, T. Garino, and B. Hance, Langmuir 11, 313 (1995).
7. D.J. Klingenberg and C.F. Zukoski, Langmuir 6, 15 (1990).
8. L. C. Davis and J. M. Ginder, in Progress in Electrorheology, edited by K. O. Havelka and F. E. Filisko (Plenum Press, New York, 1995), p. 107.
9. R. Tao and J.M. Sun, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 398 (1991).
10. R.T. Bonnecaze and J.F. Brady, J. Chem. Phys. 96, 2183 (1992).
11. F. E. Filisko, in Progress in Electrorheology, edited by K. O. Havelka and F. E. Filisko (Plenum Press, New York, 1995), p. 3.
12. D.L. Klass and T.W. Martinek, J. Appl. Phys. 38, 67 (1967).
13. H. Uejima, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 11, 319 (1972).
14. T. B. Jones, Electromechanics of Panicles (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1995), Chap. 2.
15. P. Atten, J.-N. Foulc, and N. Felici, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 8, 2731 (1994).
16. F. Ikazaki, A. Kawai, K. Uchida, T. Kawakami, K. Edamura, K. Sakurai, H. Anzai, and Y. Asako, J. Phys. D 31, 336 (1998).
17. K. O. Havelka, in Progress in Electrorheology, edited by K. O. Havelka and F. E. Filisko (Plenum Press, New York, 1995), p. 43.
18. J. Hemp, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 434, 297 (1991).
19. H. Block, K.M.W. Goodwin, E.M. Gregson, and S.M. Walker, Nature (London) 275, 632 (1978).
20. H. Block, J.P. Kelly, A. Qin, and T. Watson, Langmuir 6, 6 (1990).
21. H. Block, E. Kluk, J. MCConnell, and B.K.P. Scaife, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 101, 320 (1984).
22. Y. Hu, J. Lee, and T. Bao, in Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Electrorheological Fluids, Magnetorheological Suspensions and Their Applications, edited by M. Nakano and K. Koyama (World Scientific, Singapore, 1998), p. 123.
23. J.T.K. Wan, K.W. Yu, and G.Q. Gu, Phys. Rev. E 62, 6846 (2000).
24. H. Block and P. Rattray, in Progress in Electrorheology, edited by K. O. Havelka and F. E. Filisko (Plenum Press, New York, 1995), p. 19.
25. K. Negita and Y. Ohsawa, Phys. Rev. E 52, 1934 (1995).
26. D.J. Klingenberg, F. van Swol, and C.F. Zukoski, J. Chem. Phys. 94, 6160 (1991).
27. J.R. Melrose, Mol. Phys. 76, 635 (1992).
28. M. Whittle, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 37, 233 (1990).
29. H. See and M. Doi, J. Rheol. 36, 1143 (1992).
30. D.J. Klingenberg, F. van Swol, and C.F. Zukoski, J. Chem. Phys. 94, 6170 (1991).
31. A. W. Schubring and F. E. Filisko, in Progress in Electrorheology, edited by K. O. Havelka and F. E. Filisko (Plenum Press, New York, 1995), p. 215.
32. J. Trlica, O. Quadrat, P. Bradna, V. Pavlínek, and P. Sáha, J. Rheol. 40, 943 (1996).
33. It can be shown that the particle surface conductivity contributes to an effective particle bulk conductivity. See, for example, G. Schwarz, J. Phys. Chem. 66, 2636 (1962).
34. M. Doi and S. F. Edwards, The Theory of Polymer Dynamics (Oxford University Press, London, 1986).
35. Yue Hu, Ee-Yenn E. Lin, and Ujitha M. Dassanayake, in Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Electrorheological Fluids and Magnetorheological Suspensions, edited by G. Bossis (World Scientific, Singapore, 2002), p. 640. We have seen no qualitative difference between two-and three-dimensional results.
36. K. Tanaka, K. Ichizawa, Y. Onishi, A. Kubono, and R. Akiyama, in Proceedings of Eighth International Conference on Electrorheological Fluids and Magnetorheological Suspensions [Ref. [35]), p.773.
37. T. B. Jones, Electromechanics of Particles (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1995), Sec. 6.3.
38. C.W. Wu and H. Conrad, J. Rheol. 41, 267 (1997).