-
2
-
-
0000426972
-
-
J. Fort and V. Méndez, Phys. Rev. EPLEEE81063-651X10.1103/PhysRevE.60.5894 60, 5894 (1999).
-
(1999)
Phys. Rev. E
, vol.60
, pp. 5894
-
-
Fort, J.1
Méndez, V.2
-
3
-
-
18744402513
-
-
J. Fort and V. Méndez, Phys. Rev. Lett.PRLTAO0031-900710.1103/PhysRevLett.89.178101 89, 178101 (2002).
-
(2002)
Phys. Rev. Lett.
, vol.89
, pp. 178101
-
-
Fort, J.1
Méndez, V.2
-
4
-
-
0036293882
-
-
J. Fort and V. Méndez, Rep. Prog. Phys.RPPHAG0034-488510.1088/0034-4885/65/6/201 65, 895 (2002), especially Sec. 2.6.
-
(2002)
Rep. Prog. Phys.
, vol.65
, pp. 895
-
-
Fort, J.1
Méndez, V.2
-
5
-
-
0023746235
-
-
H. G. Othmer, S. R. Dunbar, and W. Alt, J. Math. Biol.JMBLAJ0303-6812 26, 263 (1998), especially pp. 268–270.
-
(1998)
J. Math. Biol.
, vol.26
, pp. 263
-
-
Othmer, H.G.1
Dunbar, S.R.2
Alt, W.3
-
6
-
-
84924721901
-
-
M. O. Vlad and J. Ross, Phys. Rev. EPLEEE81063-651X10.1103/PhysRevE.66.061908 66, 061908 (2002).
-
(2002)
Phys. Rev. E
, vol.66
, pp. 61908
-
-
Vlad, M.O.1
Ross, J.2
-
7
-
-
85036410811
-
-
This causes the additional complication of normalizing probabilities, so in contrast to Refs. we will deal with particle number densities per unit area instead of probabilities (also, in this way the comparison to the simpler, special case in Ref. will be much clearer)
-
This causes the additional complication of normalizing probabilities, so in contrast to Refs. we will deal with particle number densities per unit area instead of probabilities (also, in this way the comparison to the simpler, special case in Ref. will be much clearer).
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
33645047137
-
-
(draft freely available on the Internet), Appendix B, Eqs. (F.5.b, k) and (F.11.g, n). Note that the variable (Formula presented) in this reference is equivalent to (Formula presented) in Ref. and the present paper
-
J. D. Callen, Fundamentals of Plasma Physics (draft freely available on the Internet), Appendix B, Eqs. (F.5.b, k) and (F.11.g, n). Note that the variable (Formula presented) in this reference is equivalent to (Formula presented) in Ref. and the present paper.
-
Fundamentals of Plasma Physics
-
-
Callen, J.D.1
-
13
-
-
85036367585
-
-
Also, it is important to note that in Ref. we allowed also for the possibility that some individuals do not move at all: it was included in the computation of the diffusion coefficient (Formula presented)
-
Also, it is important to note that in Ref. we allowed also for the possibility that some individuals do not move at all: it was included in the computation of the diffusion coefficient (Formula presented).
-
-
-
-
14
-
-
41349083937
-
-
S. Fedotov and Y. Okuda, Phys. Rev. EPLEEE81063-651X10.1103/PhysRevE.66.021113 66, 021113 (2002).
-
(2002)
Phys. Rev. E
, vol.66
, pp. 21113
-
-
Fedotov, S.1
Okuda, Y.2
-
15
-
-
41349115457
-
-
S. Fedotov and V. Méndez, Phys. Rev. EPLEEE81063-651X10.1103/PhysRevE.66.030102 66, 030102 (2002).
-
(2002)
Phys. Rev. E
, vol.66
, pp. 30102
-
-
Fedotov, S.1
Méndez, V.2
-
17
-
-
0001185435
-
-
S. Fedotov, Phys. Rev. EPLEEE81063-651X10.1103/PhysRevE.58.5143 58, 5143 (1998).
-
(1998)
Phys. Rev. E
, vol.58
, pp. 5143
-
-
Fedotov, S.1
-
18
-
-
0037366477
-
-
A new analysis of more recent archaeological data [M. Gkiasta, T. Russell, S. Shennan, and J. Steele, AntiquityATQYAF0003-598X 77, 45 (2003)] yields a similar but somewhat higher value for the speed, although its error is not estimated (in contrast, the data in Ref. were used to compute both the time-versus-distance and the distance-versus-time speed errors in Ref.). We plan to analyze the new data in detail in a separate publication.
-
(2003)
Antiquity
, vol.77
, pp. 45
-
-
Gkiasta, M.1
Russell, T.2
Shennan, S.3
Steele, J.4
-
19
-
-
33645085154
-
-
Cambridge University Press
-
J. Stauder, The Majangir (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1971).
-
(1971)
The Majangir
-
-
Stauder, J.1
-
21
-
-
85036336308
-
-
Note that the value of (Formula presented) is necessary to compute the diffusion coefficient, namely, (Formula presented) for the single-delay model, as done in Refs
-
Note that the value of (Formula presented) is necessary to compute the diffusion coefficient, namely, (Formula presented) for the single-delay model, as done in Refs.
-
-
-
-
22
-
-
85036160076
-
-
Table 5 in Ref., p. 58 gives the age distribution of unmarried people for preindustrial agriculturalists which (neglecting death effects, which we cannot estimate, as a first approximation) allows us to determine the number of people who have left a domestic group as (Formula presented), (Formula presented), (Formula presented), and (Formula presented) (from which our values of (Formula presented) follow directly), with mean ages (Formula presented), (Formula presented), and (Formula presented). Concerning (Formula presented), in the same Ref., p. 67, it is stated that children do not become marriageable (i.e., able to disperse according to the Majangir custom) until they are (Formula presented) old. Note that these values of (Formula presented) and (Formula presented) yield a mean (Formula presented), which (adding about (Formula presented) from the parents’ migration until the child’s birth) is indeed consistent with the value of (Formula presented) for the generation time used in Ref. However, to apply the new model in the present paper, a final correction is necessary. If a son/daughter leaves their parents when he/she is, e.g., (Formula presented) old, to this we should add the time interval from the migration of his/her parents until his/her birth. Since the mean number of children per family for preindustrial agriculturalists is about 6.5 and their average birth interval is close to (Formula presented) (Ref., p. 66), we find that the mean time interval from the migration of the parents until a child's birth is of about (Formula presented). Therefore, we have used (Formula presented) to obtain our values of (Formula presented) in the main text
-
Table 5 in Ref., p. 58 gives the age distribution of unmarried people for preindustrial agriculturalists which (neglecting death effects, which we cannot estimate, as a first approximation) allows us to determine the number of people who have left a domestic group as (Formula presented), (Formula presented), (Formula presented), and (Formula presented) (from which our values of (Formula presented) follow directly), with mean ages (Formula presented), (Formula presented), and (Formula presented). Concerning (Formula presented), in the same Ref., p. 67, it is stated that children do not become marriageable (i.e., able to disperse according to the Majangir custom) until they are (Formula presented) old. Note that these values of (Formula presented) and (Formula presented) yield a mean (Formula presented), which (adding about (Formula presented) from the parents’ migration until the child’s birth) is indeed consistent with the value of (Formula presented) for the generation time used in Ref. However, to apply the new model in the present paper, a final correction is necessary. If a son/daughter leaves their parents when he/she is, e.g., (Formula presented) old, to this we should add the time interval from the migration of his/her parents until his/her birth. Since the mean number of children per family for preindustrial agriculturalists is about 6.5 and their average birth interval is close to (Formula presented) (Ref., p. 66), we find that the mean time interval from the migration of the parents until a child's birth is of about (Formula presented). Therefore, we have used (Formula presented) to obtain our values of (Formula presented) in the main text.
-
-
-
|