Transient backbending behavior in the Ising model with fixed magnetization

Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics

Volumn 68, Issue 2 2, 2003, Pages

  Gulminelli, F ^a   Carmona, J M ^b   Chomaz, Ph ^c   Richert, J ^d   Jimenez S ^b   Regnard, V ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE CAEN   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZARAGOZA   (Spain)

^c DIF   (France)

^d UNIVERSITÉ DE STRASBOURG   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EQUATIONS OF STATE; MAGNETIZATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NUMERICAL METHODS; PHASE TRANSITIONS; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS;

BACKBENDINGS; FIRST ORDER TRANSITION; ISING MODEL; TOPOLOGICAL PROPERTIES;

STATISTICAL MECHANICS;

EID: 42749099044     PISSN: 1063651X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. S. Grossmann and W. Rosenhauer, Z. Phys. 207, 138 (1967)
2. P. Borrmann et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 3511 (2000)
3. O. Mülken, H. Stamerjohanns, and P. Borrmann, Phys. Rev. E 64, 047105 (2001).
4. F. Gulminelli and Ph. Chomaz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1402 (1999)
5. F. Gulminelli and Ph. Chomaz, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 8, 527 (1999)
6. R.M. Lynden-Bell and D.J. Wales, J. Chem. Phys. 101, 1460 (1994).
7. D.H.E. Gross, Phys. Rep. 279, 119 (1997)
8. D.H.E. Gross, Microcanonical Thermodynamics: Phase Transitions in Finite Systems, Lecture Notes in Physics (World Scientific Singapore, 2001).
9. Ph. Chomaz, V. Duflot, and F. Gulminelli, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3587 (2000).
10. J. Barré, D. Mukamel, and S. Ruffo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 030601 (2001).
11. E.G.D. Cohen, e-print cond-mat/0101311.
12. M. D'Agostino et al., Phys. Lett. B 473, 219 (2000)
13. M. D'Agostino et al., Nucl. Phys. A 699, 795 (2002).
14. M. Schmidt et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1191 (2001)
15. M. Schmidt et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 203402 (2001).
16. F. Gobet et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 183403 (2002).
17. J.M. Carmona, N. Michel, J. Richert, and P. Wagner, Phys. Rev. C 61, 037304 (2000).
18. N. Fusco and M. Zannetti, e-print cond-mat/0210502.
19. T.L. Hill, Thermodynamics of Small Systems (Dover Publications, New York, 2002).
20. M. Pleimling and A. Hueller, J. Stat. Phys. 104, 971 (2001).
21. M. Kastner, J. Stat. Phys. 109, 133 (2002).
22. J.M. Carmona, J. Richert, and P. Wagner, Phys. Lett. B 531, 71 (2002).
23. Ph. Chomaz, F. Gulminelli, and V. Duflot, Phys. Rev. E 64, 046114 (2001).
24. M.S.S. Challa et al., Phys. Rev. B 34, 1841 (1986)
25. K.C. Lee, Phys. Rev. E 53, 6558 (1996)
26. Ph. Chomaz and F. Gulminelli, Physica A (to be published), e-print cond-mat/0210456.
27. J.M. Carmona, J. Richert, and A. Tarancón, Nucl. Phys. A 643, 115 (1998).
28. K. Binder and D.P. Landau, Phys. Rev. B 30, 1477 (1984).
29. L. Van Hove, Physica (Amsterdam) 15, 951 (1949)
30. C.N. Yang and T.D. Lee, Phys. Rev. 87, 404 (1952)
31. K. Huang, Statistical Mechanics (Wiley, New York, 1963), Chap. 15.2, Appendix C.
32. A. Coniglio and W. Klein, J. Phys. A 13, 2775 (1980).
33. X. Campi, H. Krivine, and A. Puente, Physica A 262, 328 (1999).
34. R.M. Lynden-Bell, Mol. Phys. 86, 1353 (1995).
35. F. Gulminelli and Ph. Chomaz, Phys. Rev. E 66, 046108 (2002).
36. F. Calvo, Ann. Phys. (Paris) 24, 4 (1999).
37. A.M. Ferrenberg and R.H. Swendsen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2635 (1988).
38. H. Reiss, J.L. Katz, and E.R. Cohen, J. Chem. Phys. 48, 5553 (1968)
39. L.G. Moretto et al., e-print nucl-th/0012037; e-print nucl-th/0208024.
40. S.K. Ma, Statistical Mechanics (World Scientific, Singapore, 1985), Chap. 15.
41. The values of the magnetization between the two peaks of the probability distribution are strongly suppressed (see Fig. 1), and this suppression increases with the size of the system. This means that in practical simulations of large lattices, the correspondence between Ising and IMFM breaks down and Eq. (4) is no longer an efficient method to calculate the thermodynamic properties of IMFM.