Temperature- and composition-driven changes in site occupation of indium solutes in Gd1+3xAl2-3x

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 69, Issue 17, 2004, Pages

  Zacate, Matthew O ^a   Collins, Gary S ^a  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM; GADOLINIUM; INDIUM;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CRYSTAL; ENTHALPY; LAVES PHASE; METAL BINDING; MODEL; PERTURBED ANGULAR CORRELATION SPECTROSCOPY; PHYSICAL PHASE; SOLUTE; SOLUTE SITE OCCUPATION; SPECTROSCOPY; TEMPERATURE; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 42749098591     PISSN: 01631829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.174202     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. P. Chartier et al., J. Appl. Phys. 75, 3842 (1994).
2. Y. L. Hao et al., Intermetallics 8, 633 (2000).
3. M. O. Zacate and G. S. Collins, Hyperfine Interact. 136/137, 647 (2001).
4. M. O. Zacate and G. S. Collins, Phys. Rev. B (to be published).
5. P. Wodniecki et al., Phys. Lett. A 288, 227 (2001).
6. G. S. Collins and Matthew O. Zacate (unpublished).
7. G. S. Collins and M. O. Zacate, Hyperfine Interact. 136/137, 641 (2001).
8. H. Jacobi and H.-J. Engell, Acta Metall. 19, 701 (1971).
9. C. Woodward, S. Kajihara, and L. H. Yang, Phys. Rev. B 57, 13459 (1998).
10. Y. P. Wu et al., Acta Metall. 37, 2835 (1989).
11. A. V. Ruban and H. L. Skriver, Phys. Rev. B 55, 856 (1997).
12. G. L. Catchen, J. M. Adams, and T. M. Rearick, Phys. Rev. B 46, 2743 (1992).
13. P. Villars and L. D. Calvert, Pearson's Handbook of Crystallographic Data for Intermetallic Phases, 2nd ed. (ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 1991).
14. G. F. Zhou and H. Bakker, Phys. Rev. B 52, 9437 (1995).
15. I. W. Modder, M. J. Kuin, and H. Bakker, Intermetallics 6, 537 (1998).
16. K. A. Gschneidner, Jr. and F. W. Calderwood, in Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams, 2nd ed., edited by T. B. Massalski (ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 1990), Vol. 1, p. 151.
17. F. Sommer and M. Keita, J. Less-Common Met. 136, 95 (1987).
18. C. Colinet et al., Physica B 150, 397 (1988).
19. 2 but not in high vacuum. Analyses of composition and mass changes indicated that fractions of rare earth element were lost from the intermetallic compound to form rare earth oxide.
20. D. Wegner, Hyperfine Interact. 23, 179 (1985).
21. Bin Bai, Ph.D. dissertation, Washington State University, 1998.
22. M. O. Zacate and G. S. Collins (unpublished).
23. P. C. Lopiparo and R. L. Rasera, in Angular Correlations in Nuclear Disintegration, edited by H. van Krugten and B. van Nooijen (Rotterdam University Press, Groningen, 1971), p. 66.
24. M. E. Phillips and F. A. Smith, Nucl. Instrum. Methods 165, 83 (1979).
25. A. R. Arends et al., Hyperfine Interact. 8, 191 (1980).
26. S. N. Mishra et al., Phys. Lett. 91A, 193 (1982).
27. Z. Z. Aksel'rod et al., Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Fiz. 50, 2372 (1986).
28. M. Forker et al., J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 226-230, 1156 (2001).
29. For a nonstoichiometric composition, point defects must be present- in order to preserve the correct ratio of lattice sites and maintain a single phase. These defects are referred to as structural defects, and their concentrations increase with the magnitude of the deviation from stoichiometry.
30. G. S. Collins and M. O. Zacate, Hyperfine Interact. 151, 77 (2003).
31. G. S. Collins, P. Sinha, and M. Wei, Hyperfine Interact. C1, 380 (1996).
32. M. O. Zacate and G. S. Collins, Defect Diffus. Forum 194-199, 383 (2001).
33. G. S. Collins, L. S.-J. Peng, and M. O. Zacate, Defect Diffus. Forum 213-215, 107 (2003).