A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blinded Placebo-Controlled Comparison of Extended Release Oxybutynin Versus Phenazopyridine for the Management of Postoperative Ureteral Stent Discomfort

Urology

Volumn 71, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 792-795

  Norris, Regina D ^a   Sur, Roger L ^a,b   Springhart, W Patrick ^a   Marguet, Charles G ^a   Mathias, Barbara J ^a   Pietrow, Paul K ^c   Albala, David M ^a   Preminger, Glenn M ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b WALTER REED ARMY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NARCOTIC ANALGESIC AGENT; OXYBUTYNIN; PHENAZOPYRIDINE; PLACEBO;

ADULT; APPLICATION SITE DISCOMFORT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYSTALGIA; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; DRUG INFORMATION; DYSURIA; FEMALE; FLANK PAIN; HEMATURIA; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCORING SYSTEM; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURGICAL PATIENT; THERAPY EFFECT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TREATMENT RESPONSE; TUBE REMOVAL; URETER STENT; URETEROSCOPY; URINARY FREQUENCY; URINARY URGENCY;

DELAYED-ACTION PREPARATIONS; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MANDELIC ACIDS; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCARINIC ANTAGONISTS; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PHENAZOPYRIDINE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STENTS; URETER;

EID: 42749090635     PISSN: 00904295     EISSN: 15279995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.11.004     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Byrne R.R., Auge B.K., Kourambas J., et al. Routine ureteral stenting is not necessary after ureteroscopy and ureteropeyloscopy: a randomized trial. J Endourol 16 1 (2002) 9-13
2. Harmon W.J., Sershon P.D., Blute M.L., et al. Ureteroscopy: current practice and long-term complications. J Urol 157 (1997) 28-32
3. Grasso M., and Bagley D. A 7.5/8.2 F actively deflectable, flexible ureteroscope: a new device for both diagnostic and therapeutic upper urinary tract endoscopy. Urol 43 (1994) 435-441
4. Ferraro R.F., Abraham V.E., Cohen T.D., et al. A new generation of semirigid fiberoptic ureteroscopes. J Endourol 13 1 (1999) 35-40
5. Bierkens A.F., Hendrikx A.J., Lemmens W.A., et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for large renal calculi: the role of ureteral stents: a randomized trial. J Urol 145 (1991) 699-702
6. Pang K.K., and Fuchs G.J. Ureteral stents and flexible ureterorenoscopy. J Endourol 7 (1993) 145-149
7. Dretler S.P. Ureteroscopic fragmentation followed by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a treatment alternative for selected large or staghorn calculi. J Urol 151 (1994) 842-846
8. El Faqih S.R., Shmsuddin A.B., Chakrabarti A., et al. Polyurethane internal ureteral stents in treatment of stone patients: morbidity related to indwelling times. J Urol 146 (1991) 1487-1489
9. Cheung M.C., Lee F., Leung Y.L., et al. A prospective randomized controlled trial on ureteral stenting after ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy. J Urol 169 (2003) 1257-1260
10. Stoller M.L., Wolf Jr. J.S., Hofmann R., et al. Ureteroscopy without routine balloon dilation: an outcome assessment. J Urol 147 (1992) 1238-1242
11. Low R.K., Stoller M.L., Irby P., et al. Outcome assessment of double-J stents during extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy of small solitary renal calculi. J Endourol 10 (1996) 341-343
12. Joshi H.B., Okeke A., Newns N., et al. Characterization of urinary symptoms in patients with ureteral stents. Urology 59 4 (2002) 511-516
13. Joshi H.B., Stainthorpe A., MacDonaugh R.P., et al. Indwelling ureteral stents: evaluation of symptoms, quality of life and utility. J Urol 169 3 (2003) 1065-1069
14. Damiano R., Oliva A., Esposito C., et al. Early and late complications of double pigtail ureteral stent. Urol Int 69 2 (2002) 136-140
15. Mardis H.K., and Kroeger R.M. Ureteral stents. Urol Clin North Am 15 3 (1988) 471-479
16. Yachia D. Overview: role of stents in urology. J Endourol 11 6 (1997) 379-382
17. Roemer F.D. There isn't an ideal smooth-surface material-yet: the history and future of urologic materials. J Endourol 14 1 (2000) 1-4
18. Mardis H.K., Kroeger R.M., Morton J.J., et al. Comparative evaluation of materials used for internal ureteral stents. J Endourol 7 (1993) 105-115
19. Olweny E.O., Landman J., Adreoni C., et al. Evaluation of the use of a biodegradable stent after retrograde endopyelotomy in a porcine model. J Urol 167 5 (2002) 2198-2202
20. Auge B.K., Ferraro R.F., Madenjian A.R., et al. Evaluation of a dissolvable ureteral drainage stent in a swine model. J Urol 168 2 (2002) 808-812
21. Beiko D.T., Watterson J.D., Knudsen B.E., et al. Double-blind randomized controlled trial assessing the safety and efficacy of intravesical agents for stent symptoms after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Endourol 18 8 (2004) 723-730
22. Byrne R.R., Auge B.K., Kourambas J., et al. Routine ureteral stenting is not necessary after ureteroscopy and ureteropyeloscopy: a randomized trial. J Endourol 16 1 (2002) 9-13
23. Chen Y.T., Chen J., Wong W.Y., et al. Is ureteral stenting necessary after uncomplicated ureteroscopic lithotripsy?. A prospective, randomized controlled trial. J Urol 167 5 (2002) 1977-1980
24. Jeong H., Kwak C., and Lee S.E. Ureteric stenting after ureteroscopy for ureteric stones: a prospective randomized study assessing symptoms and complications. BJU Int 93 7 (2004) 1032-1034
25. Easterbrook P.J., Berlin J.A., Gopalan R., et al. Publication bias in clinical research. Lancet 337 (1991) 867-872
26. Misakian A.L., and Bero L.A. Publication bias and research on passive smoking: comparison of published and unpublished studies. JAMA 280 3 (1998) 250-253
27. Guyatt G.H., and Rennie D. User's Guide to the Medical Literature: A Manual for Evidence-Based Clinical Practice. 4th ed. (2002), AMA Press, Chicago 706-708