Testing the stability of an acquiescence style factor behind two interrelated substantive variables in a panel design

Sociological Methods and Research

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 542-562

  Billiet, Jaak B ^a   Davidov, Eldad ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Acquiescence; Belgian Election Study; Distrust in politics; Perceived ethnic threat; Stability; Structural equation modeling

Indexed keywords

EID: 42649136227     PISSN: 00491241     EISSN: 15528294     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0049124107313901     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Baumgartner, Hans and Jan-Benedict E. M. Steenkamp. 2001. ''Response Styles in Marketing Research: A Cross National Investigation.'' Journal of Marketing Research 38: 143-56.
2. Bentler, Peter M., Douglas N. Jackson, and Samuel Messick. 1971. ''Identification of Content and Style: A Two Dimensional Interpretation of Acquiescence.'' Psychological Bulletin 76: 186-204.
3. Billiet, Jaak. 1995. ''Theoretical Dimensions and Measurement Models of Attitudes Towards Ethnic Minorities.'' Presented at the eighth conference of the International Research Group on Methodology and Comparative Survey Research, Prague.
4. Billiet, Jaak, Bart Cambr, and Jerry Welkenhuysen-Gybels. 2002. ''Equivalence of Measurement Instruments for Balanced Sets of Items in Cross-Cultural Surveys, Taking Method Effects Into Account.'' Pp. 53-72 in Developments in Social Science Methodology, edited by A. Ferligoj and A. Mrvar. Ljubljana, Slovenia: FVD.
5. Billiet, Jaak, Bart Maddens, and Roeland Beerten. 2003. ''National Identity and Attitude Toward Foreigners in a Multinational State: A Replication. '' Political Psychology 24: 241-57.
6. Billiet, Jaak B. and McKee J. McClendon. 2000. ''Modeling Acquiescence in Measurement Models for Two Balanced Sets of Items.'' Structural Equation Modeling 7: 608-28.
7. Billiet, Jaak, Marc Swyngedouw, Ann Carton, and Roeland Beerten. 1997. 1995 General Election Study Belgium-Flanders. Codebook and Questionnaire. Leuven, Belgium: ISPO.
8. Billiet, Jaak, Marc Swyngedouw, Astrid Depickere, and Erik Meerseman. 2000. 1999 General Election Study Belgium-Flanders. Codebook and Questionnaire. Leuven, Belgium: ISPO.
9. Billiet, Jaak, Marc Swyngedouw, and Hans Waege. 2004. ''Attitude Strength and Response Stability of a Quasi-Balanced Political Alienation Scale in a Panel Study.'' Pp. 268-92 in Studies in Public Opinion. Attitudes, Nonattitudes, Measurement Error, and Change, edited by W. E. Saris and P. M. Sniderman. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10. Block, Jack. 1971. ''On Further Conjectures Regarding Acquiescence. '' Psychological Bulletin 76: 205-10.
11. Bollen, Kenneth A. 1989. Structural Equation Models With Latent Variables. New York: John Wiley.
12. Browne, Michael W. and Robert Cudeck. 1993. ''Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit.'' Pp. 445-455 in Testing Structural Equation Models, edited by Kenneth A. Bollen and J. Scott Long. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
13. Cambr, Bart, Jerry Welkenhuysen-Gybels, and Jaak Billiet. 2002. ''Is It Content or Style? An Evaluation of Two Competitive Measurement Models Applied to a Balanced Set of Ethnocentrism Items. ''International Journal of Comparative Sociology 43: 1-20.
14. Cheung, Gordon W. and Roger B. Rensvold. 2000. ''Assessing Extreme and Acquiescence Response Sets in Cross-Cultural Research Using Structural Equation Modelling.'' Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 31: 187-212.
15. Cloud, Jonathan and Graham M. Vaughan. 1970. ''Using Balanced Scales to Control Acquiescence.'' Sociometry 33: 193-202.
16. Greenleaf, Eric A. 1992 a. ''Improving Rating Scale Parameters by Detecting and Correcting Bias Components in Some Response Styles.'' Journal of Marketing Research 29: 176-88.
17. - -. 1992 b. ''Measuring Extreme Response Style. '' Public Opinion Quarterly 56: 328-50.
18. Hamilton, David L. 1968. ''Personality Attributes Associated With Extreme Response Style.'' Psychological Bulletin 69: 192-203.
19. Hu, Li-tze and Peter M. Bentler. 1998. ''Fit Indices in Covariance Structure Modeling: Sensitivity to Underparameterized Model Specification.'' Psychological Methods 3: 424-53.
20. Jreskog, Karl G. 1990. ''New Developments in LISREL: Analysis of Ordinal Variables Using Polychoric Correlations and Weighted Least Squares.'' Quality and Quantity 24: 387-404.
21. Jreskog, Karl G. and Dag Srbom. 1993. New Features in PRELIS2. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
22. - -. 1996. LISREL 8.53 User's Reference Guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
23. Marsh, Herbert W. 1996. ''Positive and Negative Global Self-Esteem: A Substantively Meaningful Distinction or Artifactors?'' Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70: 810-19.
24. Martin, John. 1964. ''Acquiescence: Measurement and Theory. '' British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 3: 316-26.
25. McClendon, McKee J. 1991 a. ''Acquiescence and Recency Response-Order Effects in Interview Surveys.'' Sociological Methods & Research 20: 60-103.
26. - -. 1991 b. ''Acquiescence: Tests of the Cognitive Limitations and Question Ambiguity Hypotheses. '' Journal of Official Statistics 7: 153-66.
27. - -. 1992. On the Measurement and Control of Acquiescence in Latent Variable Models. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Pittsburgh, PA.
28. Mirowsky, John and Catherine E. Ross. 1991. ''Eliminating Defense and Agreement Bias From Measures of the Sense of Control: A 2 × 2 Index.'' Social Psychology Quarterly 54: 127-45.
29. Moors, Guy. 2004. ''Facts and Artefacts in the Comparison of Attitudes Among Ethnic Minorities. A Multigroup Latent Class Structure Model With Adjustment for Response Style Behavior. '' European Sociological Review 20: 303-20.
30. Paulhus, Delroy L. 1991. ''Measurement and Control of Response Bias.'' Pp. 17-59 in Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes, edited by J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, and L. S. Wrightsman. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
31. Ray, John J. 1979. ''Is the Acquiescent Response Style Problem Not So Mythical After All: Some Results From a Successful Balanced F Scale.'' Journal of Personality Assessment 43: 638-43.
32. - -. 1983. ''Reviving the Problem of Acquiescent Response Bias. '' Journal of Social Psychology 121: 81-96.
33. - -. 1984 a. ''A Further Comment on the Winkler, Kanouse, and Ware Method of Controlling for Acquiescent Response Bias. '' Journal of Applied Psychology 69: 359.
34. - -. 1984 b. ''Reinventing the Wheel: Winkler, Kanouse, and Ware on Acquiescent Response Set. ''Journal of Applied Psychology 69: 353-55.
35. Rensvold, Roger B. and Gordon W. Cheung. 1998. ''Testing Measurement Models for Factorial Invariance: A Systematic Approach.'' Educational and Psychological Measurement 58: 1017-34.
36. Rorer, Leonard G. 1965. ''The Great Response-Style Myth.'' Psychological Bulletin 63: 129-56.
37. Saris, Willem E. 1998. ''The Effects of Measurement Error in Cross Cultural Research.'' ZUMA-Nachrichten Spezial 3: 67-83.
38. Saris, Willem E. and Albert Satorra. 1993. ''Power Evaluations in Structural Models.'' Pp. 181-204 in Testing Structural Equation Models, edited by Kenneth A. Bollen and J. Scott Long. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
39. Saris, Willem E., Albert Satorra, and Dag Srbom. 1987. ''The Detection and Correction of Specification Errors in Structural Equation Models.'' Sociological Methodology 17: 105-29.
40. Schlter, Elmar, Eldad Davidov, and Peter Schmidt. 2006. ''The Dynamics of Authoritarian-ism and Anomia: Applying Autoregressive Cross-Lagged and Latent Growth Models to a Three-Wave Panel Study.'' Pp. 315-336 in Longitudinal Models in the Behavioral and Related Sciences, edited by Kees van Montfort, Johan Oud, and Albert Satorra. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
41. Schuman, Howard and Stanely Presser. 1981. Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys. New York: Academic Press.
42. Shevlin, Mark and Jeremy Miles. 1998. ''Effects of Sample Size Specification and Factor Loadings on the GFI in Confirmatory Factor Analysis. '' Personality and Individual Differences 21: 85-90.
43. Toner, Bill. 1987. ''The Impact of Agreement Bias on the Ranking of Questionnaire Response. '' Journal of Social Psychology 127: 221-2.
44. Van de Vijver, Fons and Kwok Leung. 1997. Methods and Data Analysis for Cross-Cultural Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45. Van Schuur, Wijbrandt H. and Henk A. L. Kiers. 1994. ''Why Factor Analysis Often Is the Incorrect Model for Analyzing Bipolar Concepts, and What Model to Use Instead. '' Applied Psychological Measurement 18: 97-110.
46. Watson, Dorothy. 1992. ''Correcting for Acquiescent Response Bias in the Absence of a Balanced Scale: An Application to Class Consciousness. '' Sociological Methods & Research 21: 52-88.
47. Weijters, Bert. 2006. Response Styles in Consumer Research. Leuven, Belgium: Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School.
48. Welkenhuysen-Gybels, Jerry, Jaak Billiet, and Bart Cambr. 2003. ''Adjustment for Acquiescence in the Assessment of the Construct Equivalence of Likert-Type Score Items. '' Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 34: 702-22.