Livestock vaccine adoption among poor farmers in Bolivia: Remembering innovation diffusion theory

Vaccine

Volumn 26, Issue 19, 2008, Pages 2433-2442

  Heffernan, Claire ^a   Thomson, Kim ^a   Nielsen, Louise ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bolivia; Diffusion of innovation; Vaccination adoption

Indexed keywords

ANTHRAX VACCINE; FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE VACCINE; RABIES VACCINE; RNA VACCINE;

AGRICULTURAL PROCEDURES; AGRICULTURAL WORKER; ANIMAL CARE; ANTHRAX; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BIRD DISEASE; BOLIVIA; CONTROLLED STUDY; CULTURAL FACTOR; DEMOGRAPHY; ECONOMIC ASPECT; EPISTEMOLOGY; FEMALE; FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LIVESTOCK; LOWEST INCOME GROUP; MALE; MOTIVATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RABIES; SOCIAL ASPECT; SWINE DISEASE; THEORY; VACCINATION; VETERINARY MEDICINE;

ANIMALS; ANIMALS, DOMESTIC; BOLIVIA; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; RURAL POPULATION; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; VACCINES;

EID: 42649132825     PISSN: 0264410X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.02.045     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bastien J. Qollahuaya-Andean body concepts: a topographical-hydraulic model of physiology. Am Anthropol 87 3 (1985) 595-611
2. Christensen C. The innovator's dilemma (1997), Harvard Business School Press, Boston
3. Cowan T, Becker G. Biotechnology in animal agriculture: Status and current issues. CRS Report for Congress, http://www.usis.it/pdf/other/RL33334.pdf; March 2006.
4. Dusenbury L., Brannigan R., Falco M., and Hansen W. A review of research on fidelity of implementation: implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings. Health Educ Res Theory Pract 18 2 (2003) 237-256
5. Engel P. Facilitating innovation: An action-oriented approach and participatory methodology to improve innovative social practice in agriculture. PhD thesis. Wageningen: The University of Wageningen; 1994.
6. Foster G. On the origin of humoral medicine in Latin America. Med Anthropol Quart 1 4 (1987) 355-393
7. Heffernan C, Misturelli F. The delivery of veterinary services to the poor: Findings from Kenya. A report for DFID's Animal Health Programme. London: DFID, http://www.livestockdevelopment.org; 2000.
8. Livestock Development Group. The livestock and poverty assessment methodology: A toolkit for practitioners. Reading: The University of Reading, http://www.livestockdevelopment.org; 2003.
9. Livestock Development Group. Poverty and participation: An analysis of bias in participatory methods. Report for DFID Social Development Fund. Reading: University of Reading, http://www.livestockdevelopment.org; 2003.
10. Livestock Development Group. Receptors, end-users and providers: The deconstruction of demand-led processes and knowledge transfer within animal health research. Report commissioned by the Wellcome Trust. London: Wellcome Trust; 2004.
11. LID. Strategies for improving DFID's impact on poverty reduction: A review of best practices in the livestock sector (1998), Livestock in Development, Crewkerne
12. Fandamu P., Thys E., Duchateau L., and Berkvens D. Perception of cattle farmers of the efficacy of east coast fever immunization in Southern Zambia. Trop Anim Health Prod 38 1 (2006) 9-16
13. Logan M. Selected references on the hot-cold theory of disease. Med Anthropol Newslett 6 2 (1975) 8-14
14. In: Makkar H., and Viljoen G. (Eds). Applications of gene-based technologies for improving animal production and health in developing countries (2005), Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
15. Ostlund L.E. Perceived innovation attributes as predictors of innovativeness. J Consum Res 1 2 (1974) 23-29
16. Rogers E. Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed. (2003), The Free Press, New York
17. Rogers E., and Shoemaker F. Communication of innovations: A cross-cultural approach (1971), The Free Press, New York
18. Zambrano G., Revilla J., and Paucar R. Sharing the fruits of Pachamama. In: Haverkort B., and Hiemstra W. (Eds). Food for thought: Ancient visions and new experiments of rural people (1999), ECT/Compass, Luesden
19. Davis F. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart 13 3 (1989) 319-340
20. Manning P., and Cullum-Swan B. Narrative, content, and semiotic analysis. In: Denzin N., and Lincoln Y. (Eds). Handbook of qualitative research (1994), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
21. Mahajan V., and Peterson R. Models for innovation diffusion (1985), Sage Publications, London
22. Kristjanson P., Place F., Franzell S., and Thornton P.K. Assessing research impact on poverty: the importance of farmers' perspectives. Agric Syst (2002) 73-92 72
23. Bauman L.J., Stein R.E.K., and Ireys H.T. Reinventing fidelity: the transfer of social technology among settings. Am J Commun Psychol 19 (1991) 619-639
24. Humair J.-P., Rizzi Buchs C., and Stalder H. Promoting influenza vaccination of elderly patients in primary care. Family Pract 19 (2002) 383-389
25. US Public Health Service. Healthy People 2000: National Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Objectives. DHHS publication no. (PHS)\91-50212. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 1991.
26. Bhattacharyya A., Harris T., Kvasnicka W., and Veserat G. Factors influencing the rates of adoption of trichomoniasis vaccine by Nevada range cattle producers. J Agric Resour Econ 22 1 (1997) 174-190
27. Homewood K., Trench P., Randall C., Godelieve L., and Bishop B. Livestock health and socio-economic impacts of a veterinary intervention in Maasailand: Infection-and-treatment vaccine against East Coast Fever. Agric Syst 89 2/3 (2006) 248-271
28. Beck R., and Gong H. Effect of socio-economic factors on bovine somatotropin adoption choices. J Dairy Sci 77 1 (1993) 333-337
29. Rezvanfar A. Communication and socio-personal factors influencing adoption of dairy farming technologies amongst livestock farmers. Livestock Res Rural Dev 2007; 19(3), http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd19/3/rezv19033.htm.
30. Bolorunduro P., Iwuanyanwa I., Aribido S., and Adeshinwa A. Effectiveness of extension dissemination approaches and adoption levels of livestock and fisheries technologies in Nigeria. Food Agric Environ 2 1 (2004) 298-302
31. Feiler L., Georee J., and Yariv L. An Experimental Study of Selective Exposure (2006), California Institute of Technology, Pasedena, California. http://www.hss.caltech.edu/∼lauren/SelectiveExposure.pdf