The MESSAGE methodology for agent-oriented analysis and design

Agent-Oriented Methodologies

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 203-235

  Garijo, Francisco J ^a   Gómez Sanz, Jorge J ^b   Massonet, Philippe ^c  

^a TELEFONICA RESEARCH   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

^c CETIC ^*  (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 42649130986     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59140-581-8.ch008     Document Type: Chapter

References (36)

1. Barbier, F., Henderson-Sellers, B., Le Parc-Lacayrelle, A., & Bruel, J.-M. (2003). Formalization of the whole-part relationship in the Unified Modeling Language. IEEE Trans. Software Eng., 29(5), 459-470.
2. Bauer, B., Müller, J. P., & Odell, J. (2001). Agent UML: A formalism for specifying multiagent interaction. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering (IJSEKE), 11(3), 207-230.
3. Bellifemine, F., Poggi, A., & Rimassa, G. (2001). JADE: A FIPA2000 compliant agent development environment. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Autonomous Agents (Agents 2001), Montreal, Canada (pp. 216-217). ACM Press.
4. Caire, G., Coulier, W., Garijo, F., Gomez-Sanz, J., Pavon, J., Leal, F., Chainho, P., Kearney, P.E., Stark, J., Evans, R., & Massonet, P. (2001). Agentoriented analysis using MESSAGE/UML. LNCS 2222, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
5. Caire, G., Coulier, W., Garijo, F., Gomez-Sanz, J., Pavon, J., Leal, F., Chainho, P., Kearney, P.E., Stark, J., Evans, R., & Massonet, P. (2002). EURESCOM P907: MESSAGE - Methodology for Engineering Systems of Software Agents, http://www.eurescom.de/public/projects/P900-series/p907/default.asp
6. Cook, S. (2005). UML2.0 - Trying to have it both ways in UML - the Good, the Bad or the Ugly? - Perspectives from a panel of experts. Software and Systems Modelling, 4(1), 4.
7. Dardenne, A., Lamsweerde, A. v., & Fickas, S. (1993). Goal-directed requirements acquisition. Science of Computer Programming, 20, 3-50.
8. Demazeau, Y. (2001). La méthode VOYELLES, dans Systèmes Multi-Agents: Des Théories Organisationnelles aux Applications Industrielles. Oslo, Norway: Hermès.
9. Do, T. T., Kolp, M., Hoang, T. T. H., & Pirotte, A. (2003). A Framework for Design Patterns for Tropos. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 17th Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering (SBES 2003), Maunas, Brazil, October.
10. EURESCOM P907. (2003). Methodology for agent-oriented software engineering (final) 9/20/2001. Retrieved March 29, 2005, from http://www.eurescom.de/~public-webspace/P900-series/P907/index.htm
11. Friedman-Hill, E. (2002). Java Expert System Shell (JESS). Retrieved March 29, 2005, from http://herzberg.ca.sandia.gov/jess/
12. Garijo, F., Bravo, S., Gonzalez, J., & Bobadilla, E. (2003). BOGAR_LN: An agent-based component framework for developing multi-modal services using natural language. Paper presented at the CAEPIA, LNAI, (Vol. 3040, pp. 207-220). Berlin: Springer-Verlag,
13. Garijo, F., Gómez-Sanz, J.J., Pavón, J., & Massonet, P. (2001). Multi-agent system organization. An engineering perspective. Paper presented at the Modelling Autonomous Agents in a Multi-Agent World, Annecy, France, May.
14. Garijo, F., Tous, J., Matias, J. M., Corley, S., & Tesselaar, M. (1998). Development of a multi-agent system for cooperative work with network negotiation capabilities. In S. Albayrak (Ed.), Intelligent agents for telecommunication applications, LNCS, (Vol. 1437, pp. 204-219). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
15. Giorgini, P., Kolp, M., Mylopoulos, J., & Pistore, M. (2004). The Tropos methodology: An overview. In F. Bergenti, M. P. Gleizes, & F. Zambonelli (Eds.), Methodologies and software engineering for agent systems. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishing.
16. Huhns, M. & Singh, M. (1997). Agents and multiagent systems: Themes, approaches, and challenges. In M. Huhns & M. Singh (Eds.), Reading in agents (pp. 1-23). San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
17. Iglesias, C., Mercedes Garijo, M., Gonzalez, J. C., & Velasco, J. R. (1998). Analysis and design of multiagent systems using MAS-CommonKADS. In M. P. Singh, A. Rao, & M. J. Wooldridge (Eds.), Intelligent Agents IV (LNAI Volume 1365 ed., pp. 313-327). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
18. Julian, V. & Botti, V. (2004). Developing real-time multi-agent systems. Integrated Computer Aided Engineering Journal, 11(2), 135-149.
19. Kendall, E. A. (2000). Software engineering with role modelling. In Proceedings of the Agent-Oriented Software Engineering, LNCS, Vol.1957 (pp. 163-169). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
20. Kolp, M., Do, T. T., Faulkner, S., & Hoang, H. T. T. (2005). Introspecting agent oriented design patterns. In Handbook of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering (Vol. III). World Publishing. Forthcoming 2005.
21. Kruchten, P. (1999). The rational unified process. Reading, MA: Addison- Wesley.
22. Lind, J. (2001). Iterative software engineering for multiagent systems: The MASSIVE method. Berlin; New York: Springer-Verlag.
23. Massonet, P., Deville, Y., & Neve, C. (2002). From (AOSE) methodology to agent implementation. In Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (pp. 27-34). New York: ACM Press.
24. Milgrom, E., Chainho, P., Deville, Y., Evans, R., Kearney, P., & Massonet, P. (2001). Methodology for agent oriented software engineering, Final Guidelines for the identification of relevant problem areas where agent technology is appropriate. EURESCOM Project P907. Retrieved March 29, 2005, from http://www.eurescom.de/~public-webspace/P900-series/P907/D2FinalReviewed.zip
25. Odell, J., Parunak, H. V. D., & Bauer, B. (2000). Extending UML for agents. Paper presented at the Agent-Oriented Information Systems Workshop at the 17th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence,
26. Odell, J., Parunak, V., & Bauer, B. (2001). Representing agent interaction protocols in UML. In P. Ciancarini & M. J. Wooldridge (Eds.), Agent-oriented software engineering. Proceedings of the First International Workshop (AOSE 2000). LNAI, (Vol. 1957, pp. 121-140). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
27. OMG. (2000). MOF. Meta Object Facility (specification) (No. V.1.4. formal). Retrieved March 29, 2005, from http://www.omg.org/technology/documents/formal/mof.htm
28. OMG. (2002). CORBA Component Model v3.0. Retrieved March 29, 2005, from http://www.omg.org/library/schedule/CORBA_Component_Model_RFP.htm
29. Omicini, A. (2000). SODA, societies and infrastructures in the analysis and design of agent-based systems. In Agent-Oriented Software Engineering, LNCS, Vol. 1957 (pp. 185-193). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
30. Pavón, J. & Gómez-Sanz, J. (2003). Agent-oriented software engineering with INGENIAS. Proceedings of the International Central and Eastern European Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (CEEMA '03), Prague, Czech Republic (LNCS, Vol. 2691, pp. 394-304). Springer-Verlag.
31. Szyperski, C. (1997). Beyond object-oriented programming. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
32. Walshe, D., Kennedy, J., Corley, S., Koudouridis, G., F. Van Laenen, Ouzounis, V., et al. (2000). An interoperable architecture for agent-oriented workflow management. Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IC-AI 2000), Monte Carlo Resort, Las Vegas. CSREA-Press.
33. Weiss, G. (1999). Multiagent systems. A modern approach to distributed artificial intelligence. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
34. Wooldridge, M. J., & Jennings, N. R. (1995). Agent theories, architectures, and languages: A survey. New York: Springer-Verlag,
35. Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N. R., & Kinny, D. (2000). The Gaia methodology for agent-oriented analysis and design. Journal of Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 3(3), 285-312.
36. Zambonelli, F., Jennings, N. R., & Wooldridge, M. (2001). Organisational abstractions for the analysis and design of multi-agent systems. In Proceedings of the Agent-Oriented Software Engineering, LNCS, Vol. 1957 (pp. 235-251). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.