Synergistic effects of α-pinene and exo-brevicomin on pine bark beetles and associated insects in Arizona

Journal of Applied Entomology

Volumn 132, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 387-397

  Hofstetter, R W ^a   Chen, Z ^a   Gaylord, M L ^a   McMillin, J D ^b   Wagner, M R ^a  

^a NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Bark beetle; Brevicomis; Dendroctonus; Dendroctonus frontalis; Elacatis; Enoclerus; Lure; Pheromone; Pinus ponderosa; Temnochila

Indexed keywords

ATTRACTANT; BEETLE; CONIFEROUS FOREST; CONIFEROUS TREE; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; GEOGRAPHICAL VARIATION; MORTALITY; PHEROMONE TRAP; SYNERGISM; TRAPPING;

ARIZONA; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

COLEOPTERA; DENDROCTONUS; DENDROCTONUS BREVICOMIS; DENDROCTONUS FRONTALIS; ELACATIS; ENOCLERUS; HEXAPODA; PINUS PONDEROSA; SCOLYTINAE; TEMNOCHILA; TEMNOCHILA CHLORODIA;

EID: 42649098240     PISSN: 09312048     EISSN: 14390418     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0418.2007.01263.x     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Aukema BH, Raffa KF, 2005. Selective manipulation of predators using pheromones: responses to frontalin and ipsdienol pheromone components of bark beetles in the Great Lakes region. Agric. Forest Entomol. 7, 193 200.
2. Aukema BH, Dahlsten DL, Raffa KF, 2000. Exploiting behavioral disparities among predators and prey to selectively remove pests: maximizing the ratio of bark beetles to predators removed during semiochemically based trap-out. Environ. Entomol. 29, 651 660.
3. Ayres BD, Ayres MP, Abrahamson MD, Teale SA, 2001. Resource partitioning and overlap in three sympatric species of Ips bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Oecologia 128, 443 453.
4. Bedard WD, Tilden PE, Wood DL, Silverstein RM, Brownlee RG, Rodin JO, 1969. Western pine beetle: field response to its sex pheromone and a synergistic host terpene, myrcene. Science 164, 1284 1285.
5. Bedard WD, Wood DL, Tilden PE, Lindahl KQ Jr., Silverstein RM, Rodin JO, 1980. Field response of the western pine beetle and one of its predators to host- and beetle-produced compounds. J. Chem. Ecol. 6, 625 641.
6. Berisford CW, Payne TL, Berisford Y, 1990. Geographic variation in response of southern pine beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to aggregating pheromones in laboratory bioassays. Environ. Ent. 19, 1671 1674.
7. Billings RF, Bryant CM, 1983. Developing a system for mapping the abundance and distribution of southern pine beetle habitats in east Texas. Z. Angew. Entomol. 96, 208 216.
8. Borden JH, Hunt DWA, Miller DR, Slessor KN, 1986. Orientation in forest Coleoptera: an uncertain outcome of responses by individual beetles to variable stimuli. In : Mechanisms in insect olfaction. Ed. by Payne TL, Birch MC, Kennedy CEJ, Oxford University Press, New York, 97 110.
9. Breece CR, Kolb TE, Dickson BG, McMillin JD, Clancy KM, in press. Prescribed fire effects on bark beetle activity and tree mortality in southwestern ponderosa pine forests. For. Ecol. Manage. (in press).
10. Byers JA, 1982. Male-specific conversion of the host plant compound, myrcene, to the pheromone, (+)-ipsdienol, in the bark beetle, Dendroctonus brevicomis. J. Chem. Ecol. 8, 363 371.
11. Byers JA, 1989. Behavioral mechanisms involved in reducing competition in bark beetles. Holartic Ecol. 12, 466 476.
12. Byers JA, 2004. Chemical ecology of bark beetles in a complex olfactory landscape. In : Bark and wood boring insects living in trees in Europe, a synthesis. Ed. by Lieutier F, Day KR, Battisti A, Gregoire J-C, Evans HF, Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 89 134.
13. Carmer SG, Swanson MR, 1973. Evaluation of ten pairwise multiple comparison procedures by Monte Carlo methods. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 68, 66 74.
14. Gaylord MG, Kolb TE, Wallin KF, Wagner MR, 2006. Seasonality and lure preference of bark beetles (Curculionidae: Scolytinae) and associates in a Northern Arizona ponderosa pine forest. Environ. Entomol. 35, 37 47.
15. Herms DA, Haack RA, Ayres BD, 1991. Variation in semiochemical-mediated prey-predator interaction: Ips pini (Scolytidae) and Thanasimus dubius (Cleridae). J. Chem. Ecol. 17, 515 524.
16. Lanier GN, Wood DL, 1975. Specificity of response to pheromones in the genus Ips (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). J. Chem. Ecol. 1, 9 23.
17. Lanier GN, Hendrichs JP, Flores JR, 1988. Biosystematics of the Dendroctonus frontalis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) complex. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 81, 403 418.
18. Light DM, Birch MC, Paine TD, 1983. Laboratory study of intraspecific and interspecific competition within and between two sympatric bark beetle species, Ips pini and I. paraconfusus. Zeit. Angew. Entomol. 96, 233 241.
19. Lindgren BS, 1983. A multiple funnel trap for scolytid beetles (Coleoptera). Can. Entomol. 115, 299 302.
20. Miller DR, Borden JH, 1990. β-Phellandrene kairomone for pine engraver, Ips pini (Say) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). J. Chem. Ecol. 16, 2519 2531.
21. Payne TL, 1975. Bark beetle olfaction. III. Antennal olfactory responsiveness of Dendroctonus frontalis Zimmerman and D. brevicomis Le Conte (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to aggregation pheromones and host tree terpene hydrocarbons. J. Chem. Ecol. 1, 233 242.
22. Payne TL, Coster JE, Johnson PC, 1977. Effects of slow-release formulation of synthetic endo- and exo-brevicomin on southern pine beetle flight and landing behavior. J. Chem. Ecol. 3, 133 144.
23. Pitman GB, Vite JP, 1971. Predator-prey response to western pine beetle attractants. J. Econ. Entomol. 3, 886 887.
24. Pitman GB, Vité JP, Kinzer GW, Fentiman AF Jr., 1969. Specificity of population-aggregating pheromones in Dendroctonus. J. Insect Physiol. 15, 363 366.
25. Pureswaran DS, Hofstetter RW, Sullivan BT. Attraction of the southern pine beetle, Dendroctonus frontalis to pheromone components of the western pine beetle, Dendroctonus brevicomis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) in an allopatric zone. Environ. Entomol. (in press).
26. Raffa KF, 2001. Mixed messages across multiple trophic levels: the ecology of bark beetle chemical communication systems. Chemoecology 11, 49 65.
27. Raffa KF, Dahlsten DL, 1995. Differential responses among natural enemies and prey to bark beetle pheromones. Oecologia. 102, 17 23.
28. Raffa KF, Phillips TW, Salom SM, 1993. Strategies and mechanisms of host colonization by bark beetles. In : Beetle-pathogen interaction in conifer forests. Ed. by Schowalter TD, Filip GM, Academic Press, New York, 103 128.
29. Rankin LJ, Borden JH, 1991. Competitive interactions between the mountain pine beetle and the pine engraver in Lodgepole pine. Can. J. For. Res. 21, 1029 1036.
30. Reid ML, 1999. Monogamy in the bark beetle Ips latedens: ecological correlates of an unusual mating system. Ecol. Entomol. 24, 89 94.
31. Renwick JAA, Vite JP, 1969. Bark beetle attractants: mechanisms of colonization by Dendroctonus frontalis. Nature 244, 1222 1223.
32. Richerson JV, Payne TL, 1979. Effects of bark beetle inhibitors on landing and attack behavior of the southern pine beetle and beetle associates. Environ. Entomol. 8, 360 364.
33. Rudinsky JA, 1973. Multiple functions of the southern pine beetle pheromone verbenone. Environ. Entomol. 2, 511 514.
34. Rudinsky JA, Morgan ME, Libbey LM, Putman TB, 1974. Anti-aggregation - rivalry pheromone of the mountain pine beetle and new arrestant of the southern pine beetle. Environ. Entomol. 3, 90 98.
35. Sanchez-Martinez G, Wagner MJ, 2002. Bark beetle community structure under four ponderosa pine forest stand conditions in northern Arizona. For. Ecol. Manage. 170, 145 160.
36. SAS, 2003. The SAS system for windows, version 9.1, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC 27513.
37. Schmitz RF, 1978. Taxonomy and bionomics of the North American species of Thanasimus Latreille (Coleoptera: Cleridae). Ph.D. dissertation. University of Idaho, Moscow.
38. Seybold SJ, Huber DP, Lee JC, Graves AD, Bohlmann J, 2006. Pine monoterpenes and pine bark beetles: a marriage of convenience for defense and chemical communication. Phytochem. Rev. 5, 143 178.
39. Skillen EL, Berisford CW, Camann MA, Reardon RC, 1997. Semiochemicals of forest and shade tree insects in North America and management implications. USDA Forest Service FHTET-96-15, 184.
40. Smith RH, 1975. Formula for describing effect of insect and host tree factors on resistance to western pine beetle attack. J. Econ. Entomol. 68, 841 844.
41. Smith RH, 2000. Xylem monoterpenes of pines: distribution, variation, genetics, function. Gen. Tech. Report PSW-GTR-177, 454.
42. Smith MT, Payne TL, Birth MC, 1990. Olfactory-based behavioral interactions among five species in the southern pine bark beetle group. J. Chem. Ecol. 16, 3317 3332.
43. Strom BL, Goyer RA, Ingram LL Jr., Boyd GDL, Lott LH, 2002. Oleoresin characteristics of progeny of loblolly pines that escaped attack by the southern pine beetle. For. Ecol. Manage. 158, 169 178.
44. Sturgeon KB, 1979. Monoterpene variation in ponderosa pine xylem resin related to western pine beetle predation. Evolution 33, 803 814.
45. Sullivan BT, Shepherd WP, Pureswaran DS, Mori K, 2007. Evidence that (+)-endo-brevicomin is a male produced aggregation pheromone component of the southern pine beetle, Dendroctonus frontalis. J. Chem. Ecol. 33, 1510 1527.
46. Svihra P, Paine TD, Birch MC, 1980. Interspecific olfactory communications in southern pine beetle. Naturwissenschaften 67, 518.
47. Symonds MRE, Elgar MA, 2004. Species overlap, speciation and the evolution of aggregation pheromones in bark beetles. Ecol. Lett. 7, 202 212.
48. USDA Forest Service, 2001-2006. Forest insect and disease conditions in the Southwestern Region. USDA Forest Service, Southwestern Region, Forestry and Forest Health, Albuquerque, NM. http://http://www.fs.fed.us/r3/publications/
49. Vite JP, Renwick JAA, 1971. Inhibition of Dendroctonus frontalis response to frontalin by isomers of brevicomin. Naturwissenschaften 58, 418.
50. Watterson GP, Payne TL, Richerson JJ, 1982. The effects of verbenone and endo-brevicomin on the within tree populations of Dendroctonus frontalis. J. Geo. Entomol. Soc. 17, 118 126.
51. Williams KK, McMillin JD, DeGomez TE, Clancy KM, Miller A. Influence of elevation on bark beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae, Scolytinae) community structure and flight periodicity in Ponderosa pine forests of Arizona. Environ. Entomol. (in press).
52. Wood DL, 1973. New synonymy in American bark beetles (Scolytidae: Coleoptera), Part III. Great Basin Nat. 33, 169 188.
53. Wood DL, 1982a. The role of pheromones, kairomones, and allomones in the host selection and colonization behavior of bark beetles. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 27, 411 446.
54. Wood SL, 1982b. The bark and ambrosia beetles of North and Central America (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), a taxonomic monograph. Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs No. 6, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah.
55. Zausen GL, Kolb TE, Bailey JD, Wagner MR, 2005. Long-term impacts of stand management on ponderosa pine physiology and bark beetle abundance in northern Arizona: a replicated landscape study. For. Ecol. Manage. 218, 291 305.