Maternal and paternal contribution to intergenerational recurrence of breech delivery: Population based cohort study

BMJ

Volumn 336, Issue 7649, 2008, Pages 872-876

  Nordtveit, Tone Irene ^a   Melve, Kari Klungsoyr ^a,b   Albrechtsen, Susanne ^c   Skjaerven, Rolv ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

^b NORWEGIAN INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (Norway)

^c HAUKELAND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREECH EXTRACTION; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION; GENETIC SIMILARITY; HUMAN; INHERITANCE; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECURRENCE RISK; RISK;

ADULT; BIRTH ORDER; BREECH PRESENTATION; COHORT STUDIES; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FATHERS; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMANS; MALE; MATERNAL AGE; MOTHERS; NORWAY; PEDIGREE; PREGNANCY; RECURRENCE; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 42549157168     PISSN: 09598146     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39505.436539.BE     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Albrechtsen S, Rasmussen S, Dalaker K, Irgens LM. The occurrence of breech presentation in Norway 1967-1994. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1998;77:410-5.
2. Cruikshank DP. Breech presentation. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1986;29:255-63.
3. Rayl J, Gibson PJ, Hickok DE. A population-based case-control study of risk factors for breech presentation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;174:28-32.
4. Tompkins P. An inquiry into the causes of breech presentation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1946;51:595-606.
5. Braun FH, Jones KL, Smith DW. Breech presentation as an indicator of fetal abnormality. J Pediatr 1975;86:419-21.
6. Luterkort M, Persson PH, Weldner BM. Maternal and fetal factors in breech presentation. Obstet Gynecol 1984;64:55-9.
7. Ben-Rafael Z, Seidman DS, Recabi K, Bider D, Mashiach S. Uterine anomalies. A retrospective, matched-control study. J Reprod Med 1991;36:723-7.
8. Bartlett D, Okun N. Breech presentation: a random event or an explainable phenomenon? Dev Med Child Neurol 1994;36:833-8.
9. Dunn LJ, Vanvoorhis L, Napier J. Term breech presentation; a report of 499 consecutive cases. Obstet Gynecol 1965;25:170-6.
10. Albrechtsen S, Rasmussen S, Dalaker K, Irgens LM. Reproductive career after breech presentation: subsequent pregnancy rates, interpregnancy interval, and recurrence. Obstet Gynecol 1998;92:345-50.
11. Cartledge LJ, Hancock FY. Inherited breech presentation. J Heredity 1942;33:409-10.
12. Skjaerven R, Gjessing HK, Bakketeig LS. Birthweight by gestational age in Norway. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2000;79:440-9.
13. Lubchenco LO, Hansman C, Dressler M, Boyd E. Intrauterine growth as estimated from livebom birth-weight data at 24 to 42 weeks of gestation. Pediatrics 1963;32:793-800.
14. Statistics Norway. Norwegian standard for educational grouping NC. 2000. www.ssb.no/emner/04/90/nos_c617/.
15. Lie RT. Intergenerational exchange and perinatal risks: a note on interpretation of generational recurrence risks. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2007;21(suppl 1):13-8.
16. Jaquet DD, Swaminathan SS, Alexander GRGR, Czernichow PP, Collin DD, Salihu HMHM, et al. Significant paternal contribution to the risk of small for gestational age. BJOG 2005;112:153-9.
17. Skjaerven R, Wilcox AJ, Lie RT. A population-based study of survival and childbearing among female subjects with birth defects and the risk of recurrence in their children. N Engl J Med 1999;340:1057-62.
18. Lie RT, Wilcox AJ, Skjaerven R. Survival and reproduction among males with birth defects and risk of recurrence in their children. JAMA 2001;285:755-60.
19. Backe B, Nakling J. Effectiveness of antenatal care: a population based study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993;100:727-32.