How think-and-feel-aloud instruction influences poetry readers

The Effects of Personal Involvement in Narrative Discourse: A Special Issue of Discourse Processes

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 173-192

  Eva Wood, Amy L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 42549136108     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (39)

1. Barthes, R. (1974). SIZ. New York: Hill & Wang.
2. Coleridge, S. T. (1983). Biographia literaria (2 Vols.) London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1817)
3. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor ofRobert Glaser (pp. 454-494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
4. Collins, B. (2001, November 23). The companionship of a poem. The Chronicle ofHigher Education, p. B5.
5. Cupchik, G. C., Oatley, K., & Vorderer, P.(1992). Emotional effects of reading excerpts from short stories by James Joyce. Poetics, 25, 363-377.
6. Dadlez, E. M. (1997). What's Hecuba to him? Fictional events and actual emotions. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
7. Dijkstra, K., Zwaan, R. A., Graesser, A. C., & Magliano, J. P.(1995). Character and reader emotions in literary texts. Poetics, 23, 139-157.
8. Earthman, E. A. (1992). Creating the virtual work: Reader's processes in understanding literary texts. Research in the Teaching ofEnglish, 26,351-384.
9. Eva-Wood, A. (2003). Expanding the cognitive apprenticeship model: How a think-and-feel-aloud pedagogy influences poetry readers. Dissertation Abstracts International, 64(11), 3954. (UMI No. AAT3111061)
10. Feagin, S. (1996). Reading with feeling: the aesthetics ofappreciation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
11. Gernsbacher, M. A. (1990). Language comprehension as structure building. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
12. Goetz, E. T., & Sadoski, M. (1996). Imaginative processes in literary comprehension. In R. J. Kreuz & M. S. MacNealy (Eds.), Empirical approaches to literature and aesthetics (pp. 221-240). Stamford, CT: Ablex.
13. Gutierrez, K. (1993, April). Scripts, counterscripts, and multiple scripts. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta.
14. Harker, W. J. (1994). "Plain sense and poetic significance": Tenth-grade readers reading two poems. Poetics, 22, 199-218.
15. Harley, H., &Ritter, L. (2002). Structuring the bundle: A universal morphosyntactic feature geometry. In H. J. Simon & H. Wiese (Eds.), Pronouns-grammar and representation (pp. 23-39). Philadelphia: Benjamins.
16. Heath, S. B. (1978). Teacher talk: Language in the classroom. Language in Education: Theory and Practice, 1, 1-30.
17. Hoffstaedter, P. (1987). Poetic text processing and its empirical investigation. Poetics, 16, 75-91.
18. Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163-182.
19. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
20. Kneepkens, E. W. E. M., & Zwaan, R. A. (1995). Emotions and literary text comprehension. Poetics, 23, 125-138.
21. Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D. (1994). Beyond text theory: Understanding literary response. Discourse Processes, 17, 337-352.
22. Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D. (1995). Aspects of literary response: A new questionnaire. Research in the Teaching ofEnglish, 29, 37-58.
23. Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D. (2002). A feeling for fiction: Becoming what we behold. Poetics, 30, 221-241.
24. Mukarovsky, J. (1964). Standard language and poetic language. In P. L. Garvin (Ed.), A Prague school reader on esthetics, literary structure, and style (pp. 17-30). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. (Original work published 1932)
25. Nystrand, M. (1997). Opening dialogue: Understanding the dynamics oflanguage and learning in the English classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
26. Oster, L. (2001). Using the think-aloud for reading instruction. The Reading Teacher, 55(1),64-69.
27. Peskin, J. (1998). Constructing meaning when reading poetry: An expert-novice study. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 235-263.
28. Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading. Hillsdale: NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
29. Richards, I. A. (1929). Practical criticism. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.
30. Rosenblatt, L. M. (1995). Literature as exploration (5th ed.). New York: Modern Language Association of America.
31. Sarton, M. (1993). May Sarton: Collected poems (1930-1993). New York: Norton.
32. Shklovsky, V. (1965). Art as technique. In L. T. Lemon & M. J. Reis (Eds. & Trans.), Russianformalist criticism: Four essays (pp. 3-24). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. (Original work published 1917)
33. Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
34. van den Broek, P.,Young, M., Tzeng, Y.,&Linderholm, T. (1999). The landscape model of reading: Inferences and the online construction of a memory representation. In H. van Oostendorp & S. Goldman (Eds.), The construction ofmental representations during reading (pp. 71-98). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
35. Vega, M., Leon, I., & Diaz, J. M. (1996). The representation of changing emotions in reading comprehension. Cognition and Emotion, 10,303-322.
36. Wallace-Jones, J. (1991). Cognitive responses to poetry in 11 to 16 year olds. Educational Review, 43, 25-37.
37. Wineburg, S. S. (1991). On the reading of historical texts: Notes on the breach between school and the academy. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 495-519.
38. Wineburg, S. S. (1994). The cognitive representation of historical texts. In G. Leinhardt, I. L. Beck, & C. Stainton (Eds.), Teaching and learning in history (pp. 85-135). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
39. Zwaan, R. A., Langston, M. C., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension. Psychological Review, 6, 292-297.