A representation approach to conceptualizing tangible learning environments

TEI'08 - Second International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction - Conference Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 151-158

  Price, Sara ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cognition; Conceptual framework; Learning; Representation; Tangible environments

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; REPRESENTATION; TANGIBLE ENVIRONMENTS;

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; DIGITAL COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 42549132194     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1347390.1347425     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (47)

1. Ainsworth, S., Bibby, P. & Wood, D (2002) Examining the effects of different multiple representational systems in learning primary mathematics. J. of the Learning Sciences. 11(1), 25-62.
2. Ainsworth, S. (2006) DeFT: A conceptual framework for learning with multiple representations Learning and Instruction 16,(3) 183-198.
3. Annany, M. & Cassell, J. (2001) Telling Tales: A new toy for encouraging written literacy through oral storytelling. Presentation at Society for Research in Child Development, Minneapolis.
4. Bauer, M. & Johnson-Laird, P. (1993) How diagrams can improve reasoning? Psychological Science 4, (6), 372-378.
5. Bruner, J. (1973) Going Beyond the Information Given. New York: Norton.
6. Childs, E. (2001) The Sonification of Numerical Fluid Flow Simulations. Proceedings of the 2001 International Conference on Auditory Display, Finland 2001.
7. Clements, D. (1999) 'Concrete' Manipulatives, Concrete Ideas. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 1, 1, 45-60.
8. Cox, R. & Brna, P. (1995) Supporting the Use of External Representations in Problem Solving: the Need for Flexible Learning Environments. J. of Artificial Intelligence in Education. 6(2/3).
9. Dourish, P. (2001) Where The Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. MIT Press.
10. Edge, D. & Blackwell, A. (2006) Correlates of the cognitive dimensions for tangible user interface. J. of Visual Languages & Computing, 17(4), 366-394.
11. Fishkin, K. (2004) A taxonomy for and analysis of tangible interfaces. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 8, 347-358
12. Gabrielli, S., Harris, E., Rogers, Y., Scaife, M. & Smith, H. (2001) 'How many ways can you mix colour? Young children's explorations of mixed reality environments'. CIRCUS 2001
13. Garcia-Ruiz, M.A. (2001). Using non-speech sounds to convey molecular properties in a virtual environment International Conference of New Technologies in Science Education (CINTEC), Aveiro, Portugal, 4-6 July 2001
14. Gay, R., Rieger, R., & Bennington, T. (2002). Using mobile computing to enhance field study. In N. Miyake, R. Hall, and Koschmann, T. (Eds.), CSCL 2: Carrying forward the conversation (pp. 507-528). Mahwah. NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15. Grant, W. (1993) Wireless Coyote: A Computer-Supported Field Trip. Communications of the ACM, My 1993, vol.36, No.5.
16. Holmquist, L., Redström, J. & Ljungstrand, P. (1999) Token-Based Access to Digital Information. First Int. Symp. on Handheld & Ubiquitous Computing, Karlsruhe, Springer-Verlag, 234-245.
17. Hornecker E, & Buur, J. (2006) Getting a Grip on Tangible Interaction: A Framework on Physical Space and Social Interaction. Proc. of CHI 2006. Montreal. ACM Press, 437-446.
18. Jones (aka Price), S. & Scaife, M (2000) Animated Diagrams: An investigation into the cognitive effects of using animation to illustrate dynamic processes. In M. Anderson & P. Cheng (eds) Theory & Applications of Diagrams. Lecture Notes in AI, 1889, Berlin, Springer-Verlag. 231-244.
19. Koleva, B, Benford, S, Hui Ng, K. & Rodden, T. (2003) A Framework for Tangible User Interfaces. Physical Interaction Workshop on Real World User Interfaces. Mobile HCI, Udine, Italy
20. Larkin, J. & Simon, H. (1987) Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words Cognitive Science 11, 69-100
21. Lowe, R. (1999) Extracting information from an animation during complex visual learning. European Journal of Psychology of Education Vol. XIV, 2, 225-244.
22. Marshall, P., Price, S., & Rogers, Y. (2003). Conceptualising tangibles to support learning. Proceedings of Interaction Design and Children, Preston, England, July 1-3, pp 101-110
23. Marshall, P. (2007) Do tangible interfaces enhance learning? In Proc. 1st international conference on Tangible and embedded interaction. Louisiana, Feb 15-17, 163 - 170.
24. Metcalf, S. J., & Tinker, R. (2003). TEEMSS: Technology Enhanced Elementary and Middle School Science. Presentation at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Philadelphia: PA.
25. Moher, T., Hussain, S., Halter, T., & Kilb, D. (2005). RoomQuake: Embedding dynamic phenomena within the physical space of an elementary school classroom. Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1655-1668, ACM Press.
26. Novak, A., Gleason, C., Mahoney, J., & Krajcik, J. (2002) Inquiry Through Portable Technology. Science Scope Nov/Dec 2002
27. O'Malley, C. & Stanton-Fraser, D. (2004) Literature Review in Learning with Tangible Technologies. NESTA Nesta Futurelab, 12.
28. Papert, S. (1980) Mindstorms: Children, computers and powerful ideas. NY, Basic Books.
29. Pea, R. D. (1994). Seeing what we build together: Distributed multimedia learning environments for transformative communications. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 285-299
30. Price, S. (2002) Animated Diagrams: How effective are explicit dynamics for learners? In P. Bell, R. Stevens, & T. Satwitz (eds), Keeping Learning Complex: The Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 344-351. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. Price, S. & Rogers, Y. (2003) Let's get physical: the learning benefits of interacting in digitally augmented physical spaces. In (eds) J. Underwood & J. Gardner, Computers & Education: Special issue:21st Century Learning: 43, 137-151
32. Price, S., Rogers, Y., Scaife, M., Stanton, D. & Neale, H. (2003) Using 'tangibles' to promote novel forms of playful learning. Interacting with Computers, 15/2, May 2003, 169-185.
33. Raffle, H., Parkes, A., Ishii, H. & Lifton, J. (2006) Beyond record and play. Backpacks: Tangible Modulators for Kinetic Behavior. CHI 2006 April, Montreal, Canada.
34. Randell, C. Price, S. Rogers, Y. Harris. E. & Fitzpatrick, G (2004) The Ambient Horn: Designing a novel audio-based learning experience, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing. 8, 3, 144-161.
35. Resnick, M. Martin, F. Sargent, R. & Silverman, B. (1996) Programmable Bricks: Toys to Think With. IBM Systems Journal 35, 3-4.
36. Rogers, Y. & Scaife, M.(1998) How can interactive multimedia facilitate learning? In Lee, J.(ed.) Intelligence & Multimodality in Multimedia Interfaces: Research & Applications. AAAI.
37. Rogers, Y., Scaife, M., Harris, E., Phelps, T., Price, S., Smith, H., et al. (2002). Things aren't what they seem to be: Innovation through technology inspiration. Proceedings of DIS'2002 Designing Interactive Systems (pp. 373-379). New York: ACM Press.
38. Rogers, Y., Price, S., Randell, C., Stanton-Fraser, D., Weal, M., & Fitzpatrick, G. (2005) Ubi-learning Integrates Indoor and Outdoor Experiences, Communications of the ACM. January 2005, Vol 48, No. 1, 55-59
39. Scaife, M & Rogers, Y (1996) External Cognition: how do graphical representations work? Int. J. of Human-Computer Studies 45, 185-213.Stephan, J. (1996) Targeting Students' Science Misconceptions: Physical Science Concepts Using the Conceptual Change Model. Riverview.
40. Stenning, K. (1998) Distinguishing Semantic from Processing Explanations of Usability of Representations: Applying Expressiveness Analysis to Animation. In (eds.) J. Lee, Intelligence and Multimodality in Multimedia Interfaces: Research and Applications, AAAI Press.
41. Ullmer, B. & Ishii, H. (2001) Emerging frameworks for tangible user interfaces. Carroll, J. ed. Human Computer Interaction in the New Millenium, Allison-Wesley, 2001, 579-601.
42. Underkoffler, J. & Ishii, H. (1999) Urp: A Luminous-Tangible Workbench for Urban Planning and Design Proceedings of CHI, May 15-19
43. Uttal, W. R. (2003). Psychomythics: Sources of artifacts and misconceptions in scientific psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, Inc.
44. nd 2007 http://freq1550.waag.org/
45. Yonemoto, S., Yotsumoto, T. & Taniguchi, R. (2006) A Tangible Interface for Hands-on Learning, Tenth Int. Conf. on Information Visualisation iv, 535-538.
46. Zhang, J. & Norman, D. (1994) Representations in distributed cognitive tasks. Cognitive Science 18, 87-122.
47. Zuckerman, O. Grotzer, T. & Leahy, K. (2006) Flow blocks as a conceptual bridge between understanding the structure and behavior of a complex causal system. Proc. of the 7th Int. Conf. Learning Sciences Indiana, 880-886.