Personality traits, intelligence, and success at work. A review of international and national research;Persönlichkeitseigenschaften, Intelligenz und Erfolg im Beruf: Eine Bestandsaufnahme internationaler und nationaler Forschung

Psychologische Rundschau

Volumn 59, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 108-122

  Hülsheger, Ute R ^a   Maier, Günter W ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Career success; Criterion oriented validity; Intelligence; Job pertormance; Personality; Personnel selection

Indexed keywords

EID: 42549118042     PISSN: 00333042     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1026/0012-1924.59.2.108     Document Type: Review

References (151)

1. Ackermann, P. L. (1994). Intelligence, attention and learning: Maximal and typical performance. In D. K. Dettermann (Ed.), Current topics in human intelligence; Vol 4: Theories of intelligence (pp. 1-27). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
2. Amelang, M. & Steinmayr, R. (2006). Is there a validity increment for tests of emotional intelligence in explaining the variance of performance criteria? Intelligence, 34, 459-468.
3. Amthauer, R., Brocke, B., Liepmann, D. & Beauducel, A. (2001). I-S-T 2000 R - Intelligenz-Struktur-Test 2000 R. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
4. Anderson, N. (2004). Editorial - The dark side of the moon: Applicant perspectives, negative psychological effects (NPEs), and candidate decision making in selection. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 1-8.
5. Anderson, N. (2007). The practitioner - researcher divide revisited: Strategic level bridges and the roles of IWO psychologists. Rejoinder. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80, 175-183.
6. Anderson, N., Lievens, F., van Dam, K. & Ryan, A. M. (2004). Future perspectives on employee selection: Key directions for future research and practice. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53,487-501.
7. Ashton, M. C. (1998). Personality and job performance: The importance of narrow traits. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 289-303.
8. Barrick, M. R. & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.
9. Barrick, M. R. & Mount, M. K. (2005). Yes, personality matters: Moving on to more important matters. Human Performance, 18, 359-372.
10. Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K. & Judge, T. A. (2001). Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 9-20.
11. Bertua, C., Anderson, N. & Salgado, J. F. (2005). The predictive validity of cognitive ability tests: A UK meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78, 387-409.
12. Birkeland, S. A., Manson, T. M., Kisamore, J. L., Brannick, M. T. & Smith, M. A. (2006). A Meta-Analytic Investigation of Job Applicant Faking on Personality Measures. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 14, 317-335.
13. Bless, H., Wanke, M., Bohner, G., Fellhauer, R. F. & Schwarz, N. (1994). Need for Cognition: Eine Skala zur Erfassung von Engagement und Freude bei Denkaufgaben. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 25, 147-154.
14. Borkenau, P., Egloff, B., Eid, M., Hennig, J., Kersting, M., Neubauer, A. C. & Spinath, F. M. (2005). Persönlichkeitspsychologie: Stand und Perspektiven. Psychologische Rundschau, 56, 271-290.
15. Borman, W. C., Penner, L. A., Allen, T. D. & Motowidlo, S. J. (2001). Personality predictors of citizenship performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 52-69.
16. Brand, C. (1987). The importance of general intelligence. In S. Modgil & C. Modgil (Eds.), Consensus and controversy (pp. 251-265). New York: Falmer.
17. Brandstätter, H. & Riedl, J. (2006). Schulleiterauswahl - eine Evaluationsstudie im Spannungsfeld der Bildungs- und Personalpolitik. Zeitschrift für Personalpsychologie, 5, 16-22.
18. Brunstein, J. C. & Schmitt, C. H. (2004). Assessing individual differences in achiement motivation with the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 536-555.
19. Buchmann, C. & Dalton, B. (2002). Interpersonal influences and educational aspirations in 12 countries: The importance of institutional context. Sociology of Education, 75, 99-122.
20. Büscher, P., Conrad, W., Hornke, L., Jäger, R., Schweizer, H., von Stünzner, W. & Wiencke, W. (1986). Mannheimer Intelligenztest MIT (3. Aufl.). Weinheim: Beltz.
21. Byrne, Z. S., Mueller-Hanson, R. A., Cardador, J. M., Thornton, G. C., Schuler, H., Frintrup, A. & Fox, S. (2004). Measuring achievement motivation: Tests of equivalency for English, German, and Israeli versions of the achievement motivation inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 203-217.
22. Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J. A., Blair, W. & Jarvis, G. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 197-253.
23. Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E. & Kao, C. F. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 306-307.
24. Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Collins, J. M., Schmidt, F. L., Sanchez-Ku, M., Thomas, L., McDaniel, M. A. & Le, H. (2003). Can basic individual differences shed light on the construct meaning of assessment center evaluations? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 17-29.
26. Cronbach, L. J. ( 1949). Essentials of psychological testing. New York, NY: Harper.
27. Cronbach, L. J. & Gleser, G. C. (1965). Psychological tests and personnel decisions (2nd ed.). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
28. Davies, M., Stankov, L. & Roberts, R. D. (1998). Emotional intelligence: In search of an elusive construct. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 989-1015.
29. Dieterich, T. (2005). 10. Grundgesetz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland. In T. Dieterich, R. Müller-Glöge, U. Preis & G. Schaub (Hrsg.), Erfurter Kommentar zum Arbeitsrecht (5. Aufl., S. 1-169). München: Beck.
30. DIN Deutsches Institut für Normung e.V. (2002). Anforderungen an Verfahren und deren Einsatz bei berufsbezogenen Eignungsbeurteilungen - DIN 33430. Berlin.
31. Dudley, N. M., Orvis, K. A., Lebiecki, J. E. & Cortina, J. M. (2006). A meta-analytic investigation of conscientiousness in the prediction of job performance: Examining the intercorrelations and the incremental validity of narrow traits. Journal of Applied Psy chlogy, 91, 40-57.
32. Egloff, B. & Schmukle, S. C. (2002). Predictive validity of an implicit association test for assessing anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1441-1455.
33. Ellingson, J. E., Sackett, P. R. & Hough, L. M. (1999). Social desirability corrections in personality measurement: Issues of applicant comparison and construct validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 155-166.
34. Erez, A. & Judge, T. A. (2001). Relationship of core self-evaluations to goal setting, motivation, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1270-1279.
35. Fahrenberg, J., Hampel, R. & Selg, H. (2001). FPI-R: Das Freiburger Persönlichkeitsinventar (7. überarbeitete und neu normierte Aufl.). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
36. Franken, T. & Melzer, M. (2007). Rechtliche Grundlagen der Eignungsbeurteilung. In M. John & G. W. Maier (Hrsg.), Eignungsdiagnostik in der Personalarbeit: Grundlagen, Methoden, Erfahrungen (S. 73-100). Wiesbaden: Symposium.
37. Frese, M. (2000). The changing nature of work. In N. Chmiel (Ed.), Introduction to work and organizational psychology : A European perspective (pp. 424-439). Oxford: Blackwell.
38. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
39. Gottfredson, L. S. (1997). Why g matters: The complexity of everyday life. Intelligence, 24, 79-132.
40. Gottfredson, L. S. (2002). Where and why g matters: Not a mystery. Human Performance, 15, 25-46.
41. Gottfredson, L. S. (2003 a). Dissecting practical intelligence theory: Its claims and evidence. Intelligence, 31, 343-397.
42. Gottfredson, L. S. (2003b). On Sternberg's "Reply to Gottfredson". Intelligence, 31, 415-424.
43. Gottfredson, L. S. (2004). Intelligence: Is it the epidemiologists' elusive "Fundamental cause" of social class inequalities in health? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 174-199.
44. Greenwald, A. G. & Farnham, S. D. (2000). Using the implicit association test to measure self-esteem and self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 1022-1038.
45. Guion, R. M. & Gottier, R. F. (1965). Validity of personality measures in personnel selection. Personnel Psychology, 18, 135-164.
46. Hell, B., Boramir, I., Schaar, H. & Schuler, H. (2006). Interne Personalauswahl und Personalentwicklung in deutschen Unternehmen. Wirtschaftspsychologie, 1, 1-20.
47. Hogan, J. & Roberts, B. W. (1996). Issues and non-issues in the fidelity-bandwidth trade-off. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 627-637.
48. Hossiep, R. & Paschen, M. (2003). Das Bochumer Inventar zur berufsbezogenen Persönlichkeitsbeschreibung (BIP) (2. Aufl.). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
49. Hossiep, R., Turck, D. & Hasella, M. (2001). BOMAT: Bochumer Matrizentest. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
50. Hough, L. M. (2001). I/Owes its advances to personality. In B. W. Roberts & R. Hogan (Eds.), Personality and psychology in the workplace (pp. 19-44). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
51. Hough, L. M. & Oswald, F. L. (2005). They're right, well ... mostly right: Research evidence and an agenda to rescue personality testing from 1960s insights. Human Performance, 18, 373-387.
52. Howard, A. (1995). The changing nature of work. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
53. Hülsheger, U. R. & Anderson, N. (2008). Applicant perspectives in selection: Going beyond preference reactions to performance and psychological health outcomes [special Issue]. International Journal of Selection and Assessment. Special issue in preparation.
54. Hülsheger, U. R., Anderson,N., Havermanns, L. & Salgado, J. F. (in press). Back to the future: Employee selection and performance management in overview. In N. Anderson & U. R. Hülsheger (Eds), Major works in employee selection and performance management. London, UK: Sage.
55. Hülsheger, U. R., Maier, G. W. & Stumpp, T. (2007). Validity of general mental ability for the prediction of job performance and training success in Germany: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15, 3-18.
56. Hülsheger, U. R., Maier, G. W., Stumpp, T. & Muck, P. M. (2006). Vergleich kriteriumsbezogener Validitäten verschiedener Intelligenztests zur Vorhersage von Ausbildungserfolg in Deutschland: Ergebnisse einer Metaanalyse. Zeitschrift für Personalpsychologie, 5, 145-162.
57. Hülsheger, U. R., Muck, P. M. & Schupp, G. (2007). On the validity of peer-report personality measures for career success and organizational citizenship behavior. Manuscript in preparation.
58. Hülsheger, U. R., Specht, E. & Spinath, F. M. (2006). Validität des BIP und des NEO-PI-R: Wie geeignet sind ein berufsbezogener und ein nicht explizit berufsbezogener Persönlichkeitstest zur Erklärung von Berufserfolg? Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 50, 135-147.
59. Hunter, J. E. (1986). Cognitive ability, cognitive aptitude, job knowledge, and job performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 29, 340-362.
60. Hunter, J. E. & Hunter, R. F. (1984). Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 72-98.
61. Hunthausen, J. M., Truxillo, D. M., Bauer, T. N., & Hammer, L. B. (2003). A field study of frame-of-reference effects on personality test validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 545-551.
62. Jäger, A. O., Süß, H. M. & Beauducel, A. (1997). BIS-TEST-Berliner Intelligenzstruktur-Test - Form 4. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
63. Jensen, A. R. (1993). Test validity: g versus "tacit knowledge". Directions in Psychological Science, 2, 9-10.
64. Judge, T. A., Colbert, A. E. & Hies, R. (2004). Intelligence and leadership: A quantitative review and test of theoretical propositions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 542-552.
65. Judge, T. A., Erez, A., Bono, J. E. & Thoresen, C. J. (2003). The Core Self-Evaluations Scale: Development of a measure. Personnel Psychology, 56, 303-331.
66. Judge, T. A., Higgins, C. A., Thoresen, C. J. & Barrick, M. R. (1999). The Big Five personality traits, general mental ability, and career success across the life span. Personnel Psychology, 52, 621-652.
67. Judge, T. A., Kammeyer-Mueller, J. & Bretz, R. D. (2004). A longitudinal model of sponsorship and career success: A study of industrial-organizational psychologists. Personel Psychology, 57, 271-303.
68. Judge, T. A., Locke, E. A. & Durham, C. C. (1997). The dispositional causes of job satisfaction: A core evaluations approach. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol 19, 1997, 19, 151-188.
69. Kaehler, B. (2006). Individualrechtliche Zulässigkeit des Einsatzes psychologischer Testverfahren zu Zwecken der betrieblichen Bewerberauswahl. Der Betrieb, 5, 277-288.
70. Kanning, U. P. & Holling, H. (2000). Struktur, Reliabilität und Validität des NEO-FFI in einer Personalauswahlsituation. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 22, 239-247.
71. Kern, H. & Schumann, M. (1990). Das Ende der Arbeitsteilung? Rationalisierung in der industriellen Produktion: Bestandsaufnahme, Trendbestimmung (4. Aufl.). München: Beck.
72. Kersting, M. (2004). Zur Bedeutung der Validität und der sozialen Akzeptanz in der Berufseignungsdiagnostik. Zeitschrift für Personalpsychologie, 3, 83-86.
73. Resting, M., Stumpp, T., Hülsheger, U. R. & Maier, G. W. (2006). Zentrale Selbstbewertungen - Validierung eines Messinstrumentes. Poster präsentiert auf der 45. Konferenz der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie (DGPs), Nürnberg 17.-21.09.2006.
74. Krampen, G. & Schui, G. (2006). ZPID-Monitor 2004 zur Internationalität der Psychologie aus dem deutschsprachigen Bereich: Der Kurzbericht. Psychologische Rundschau, 57, 254-255.
75. Kuncel, N. R., Hezlett, S. A. & Ones, D. S. (2004). Academic performance, career potential, creativity, and job performance: Can one construct predict them all? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 148-161.
76. Levine, E. L., Spector, P. E., Menon, S., Narayanan, L. & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (1996). Validity generalization for cognitive, psychomotor, and perceptual tests for craft jobs in the utility industry. Human Performance, 9, 1-22.
77. Marcus, B. (2003 a). Attitudes towards personnel selection methods: A partial replication and extension in a German sample. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 52, 515-532.
78. Marcus, B. (2003b). Persönlichkeitstests in der Personalauswahl: Sind "sozial erwünschte" Antworten wirklich nicht wünschenswert? Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 211, 138-148.
79. Marcus, B. (2004). Rezension der 2. Auflage des Bochumer Inventars zur berufsbezogenen Persönlichkeitsbeschreibung (BIP) von R. Hossiep & M. Paschen. Zeitschrift für Arbeitsund Organisationspsychologie, 48, 79-86.
80. Marcus, B. (2006a). IBES: Inventar berufsbezogener Einstellungen und Selbsteinschätzungen. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
81. Marcus, B. (2006b). Relationships between faking, validity, and decision criteria in personnel selection. Psychology Science, 48, 226-246.
82. Marcus, B., Höft, S. & Riediger, M. (2006). Integrity tests and the five-factor model of personality : A review and empirical test of two alternative positions. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 14, 113-130.
83. Marcus, B., Lee, K. & Ashton, M.C. (2007). Personality dimensions explaining relationships between integrity tests and counterproductive behavior. Big Five, or one in addition? Personnel Psychology, 60, 1-34.
84. Mayer, J. D. & Salovey, P. (1997). What is emotional intelligence? In P. Salovey & D. Sluyter (Eds.), Emotional development and emotional intelligence (pp. 3-31). New York: Basic Books.
85. Meyer, G. J., Finn, S. E., Eyde, L. D., Kay, G. G., Moreland, K. L., Dies, R. R., Eisman, E. J., Kubiszyn, T. W. & Reed, G. M. (2001). Psychological testing and psychological assessment - A review of evidence and issues. American Psychologist, 56, 128-165.
86. Moser, K. & Soucek, R. (2003). Das Bochumer Inventar zur berufsbezogenen Persönlichkeitsbeschreibung (BIP). Zeitschrift für Personalpsychologie, 2, 101-104.
87. Muck, P. M. & Stumpp, T. (2007). Persönlichkeits- und Interessenstests. In M. John & G. W. Maier (Hrsg.), Eignungsdiagnostik in der Personalarbeit: Grundlagen, Methoden, Erfahrungen (S. 173-197). Wiesbaden: Symposium.
88. Murphy, K. R. & Dzieweczynski, J. L. (2005). Why don't measures of broad dimensions of personality perform better as predictors of job performance? Human Performance, 18, 343-357.
89. Myers, I. B. & McCaulley, M. H. (1985). Manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
90. Neisser, U., Boodoo, G., Bouchard, T. J. Jr., Boykin, A. W., Brody, N., Ceci, S. J., Halpern, D. F., Loehlin, J. C., Perloff, R., Sternberg, R. J. & Urbina, S. (1996). Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns. American Psychologist, 51, 77-101.
91. Neubauer, A. C. & Freudenthaler, H. H. (2002). Sind emotionale traits als Fähigkeit messbar? Kommentar zum Artikel "Emotionale Intelligenz - ein irreführender und unnötiger Begriff" von Heinz Schuler. Zeitschrift für Personalpsychologie, 1, 177-178.
92. Ng, T. W. H., Eby, L. T., Sorensen, K. L. & Feldman, D. C. (2005). Predictors of objective and subjective career success: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 58, 367-408.
93. Ones, D. S. & Anderson, N. (2002). Gender and ethnic group differences on personality scales in selection: Some British data. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75, 255-276.
94. Ones, D. S. & Viswesvaran, C. (1996). Bandwidth-fidelity dilemma in personality measurement for personnel selection. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 609-626.
95. Ones, D. S. & Viswesvaran, C. (2001). Integrity tests and other criterion-focused occupational personality scales (COPS) used in personnel selection. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 31-39.
96. Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C. & Dilchert, S. (2005). Personality at work: Raising awareness and correcting misconceptions. Human Performance, 18, 389-404.
97. Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C. & Reiss, A. D. (1996). Role of social desirability in personality testing for personnel selection: The red herring. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 660-679.
98. Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C. & Schmidt, F. L. (1993). Comprehensive meta-analysis of integrity test validities: Findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 679-703.
99. Organ, D. W. & Ryan, K. (1995). A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 48, 775-802.
100. Ostendorf, F. & Angleitner, A. (2004). NEO- Persönlichkeitsinventar nach Costa und McCrae, Revidierte Fassung (NEOPI-R). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
101. Pfrang, H. & Schneider, W. (2006). Internationale Sichtbarkeit und Resonanz der psychologischen Forschung aus Deutschland. Psychologische Rundschau, 57, 224-242.
102. Preckel, F., Holling, H. & Vock, M. (2006). Academic underachievement: Relationship with cognitive motivation, achievement motivation, and conscientiousness. Psychology in the Schools, 43, 401-411.
103. Preis, U. (2005). Abschnitt 8. Einzelne Schuldverhältnisse. In T. Dieterich, R. Müller-Glöge, U. Preis & G. Schaub (Hrsg.), Erfurter Kommentar zum Arbeitsrecht (5. Aufl., S. 1378-1530). München: Beck.
104. Ree, M. J. & Carretta, T. R. (2002). g2K. Human Performance, 15, 3-23.
105. Ree, M. J. & Earles, J. A. (1991). Predicting training success: Not much more than g. Personnel Psychology, 44, 321-332.
106. Ree, M. J., Earles, J. A. & Teachout, M. S. (1994). Predictingjob performance: Not much more than g. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 518-524.
107. Rosse, J. G., Stecher, M. D., Miller, J. L. & Levin, R. A. (1998). The impact of response distortion on preemployment personality testing and hiring decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 634-644.
108. Rust, J. (2006). Business-Focused Inventory of Personality: UK Version (BIP). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
109. Ryan, A. M., McFarland, L., Baron, H. & Page, R. (1999). An international look at selection practices: Nation and culture as explanations for variability in practice. Personnel Psychology, 52, 359-391.
110. Ryan, A. M. & Sackett, P. R. (1992). Relationships between graduate training, professional affiliation, and individual psychological-assessment practices for personnel decisions. Personnel Psychology, 45, 363-387.
111. Salgado, J. F. (1997). The Five Factor Model of Personality and job performance in the European community. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 30-43.
112. Salgado, J. F., Anderson, N. & Hülsheger, U. R. (in press). Personnel Selection in Europe: Psychotechnics and the hidden history of modern scientific personnel selection. In I. Farr & N. Tippins (Eds.), Handbook of employee selection. New York, NY: Erlbaum.
113. Salgado, J. F., Anderson, N., Moscoso, S., Bertua, C. & de Fruyt, F. (2003a). International validity generalization of GMA and cognitive abilities: A European community meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 56, 573-605.
114. Salgado, J. F., Anderson, N., Moscoso, S., Bertua, C., de Fruyt, F. & Rolland, J. P. (2003b). A meta-analytic study of general mental ability validity for different occupations in the European community. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 1068-1081.
115. Salovey, P. & Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 9, 185-211.
116. Schmid, K. (1981). Rechtsprobleme bei der Anwendung psychologischer Testverfahren zur Personalauslese. Betriebs-Berater, 36, 1646-1651.
117. Schmidt, F. L. (1992). What do data really mean: Research findings, metaanalysis, and cumulative knowledge in psychology. American Psychologist, 47, 1173-1181.
118. Schmidt, F. L. (2002). The role of general cognitive ability and job performance: Why there cannot be a debate. Human Performance, 15, 187-211.
119. Schmidt, F. L. & Hunter, J. E. (1977). Development of a general solution to the problem of validity generalization. Journal of Applied Psychlogy, 62, 529-540.
120. Schmidt, F. L. & Hunter, J. E. (1992). Development of a causal model of processes determining job performance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 89-92.
121. Schmidt, F. L. & Hunter, J. E. (1993). Tacit knowledge, practical intelligence, general mental ability, and job knowledge. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2, 8-9.
122. Schmidt, F. L. & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262-274.
123. Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, E. & Outerbridge, A. N. (1986). Impact of job experience and ability on job knowledge, work sample performance, and supervisory ratings of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychlogy, 71, 432-439.
124. Schmit, M. J. & Ryan, A. M. (1993). The Big-5 in personnelselection - factor structure in applicant and nonapplicant populations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 966-974.
125. Schmitt, N., Rogers, W., Chan, D., Sheppard, L. & Jennings, D. (1997). Adverse impact and predictive efficiency of various predictor combinations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 719-730.
126. Schneewind, K. A. & Graf, J. (1998). Der 16-Persönlichkeits- Faktoren-Test, Revidierte Fassung: (16PF-R). Bern: Huber.
127. Schneider, R. J., Hough, L. M. & Dunnette, M. D. (1996). Broadsided by broad traits: How to sink science in five dimensions or less. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 639-655.
128. Schüler, H. (2002). Emotionale Intelligenz: Ein unnötiger und irreführender Begriff. Zeitschrift für Personalpsychologie, 3, 138-140.
129. Schuler, H., Hell, B., Trapmann, S., Schaar, H. & Boramir, I. (2007). Die Nutzung psychologischer Verfahren der externen Personalauswahl in deutschen Unternehmen - ein Vergleich über 20 Jahre. Zeitschrift für Personalpsychologie, 2, 60-70.
130. Schuler, H. & Klingner, Y. (2005). Arbeitsprobe zur berufsbezogenen Intelligenz - Büro- und kaufmännische Tätigkeiten (AZUBI-BK). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
131. Schuler, H. & Prochaska, M. (2001). LMI: Leistungsmotivationsinventar. Göttingen. Hogrefe.
132. Schuler, H., Thornton, G.-C.-L, Frintrup, A. & Mueller-Hanson, R. (2004). AMI: Achievement Motivation Inventory. Ashland, OH, US: Hogrefe & Huber.
133. Schulte, M. J., Ree, M. J. & Carretta, T. R. (2004). Emotional intelligence: Not much more than g and personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 1059-1068.
134. Schulze, R., Freund, P. A. & Roberts, R. D. (Hrsg.). (2006). Emotionale Intelligenz: Ein internationales Handbuch. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
135. Seibert, S. E. & Kraimer, M. L. (2001). The Five-Factor Model of personality and career success. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 1-21.
136. Shackleton, V. & Newell, S. (1997). International assessment and selection. In N. Anderson & P. Herriot (Eds.), International handbook of selection and assessment (pp. 81-95). Chichester: John Wiley & sons.
137. Smith, M. & Abrahamsen, M. (1992). Patterns of selection in six countries. The Psychologist, 5, 205-207.
138. Steinmayr, R. & Amelang, M. (2006). Erste Untersuchung zur Kriteriumsvalidität des IST 2000 R an Erwachsenen beiderlei Geschlechts. Diagnostica, 52, 181-188.
139. Sternberg, R. J., Forsythe, G. B., Hedlund, J., Horvath, J. A., Wagner, R. K., Williams, W. M., Snook, S. A. & Grigorenko, E. L. (2000). Practical intelligence in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
140. Stierle, C., van Dick, R. & Wagner, U. (2002). Success or failure? Personality, family, and intercultural orientation as determinants of expatriate managers' success. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 33, 209-218.
141. Stumpf, H., Angleitner, A., Wieck, T., Jackson, D. N. & Beloch-Till, H. (1985). Deutsche Personality Research Form (PRF). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
142. Stumpp, T., Hülsheger, U. R., Muck, P. M. & Maier, G. W. (2006). Expanding the link between core self-evaluations and affective job attitudes. Mansucript submitted for publication.
143. Stumpp, T., Muck, P. M., Hülsheger, U. R., Judge, T. A. & Maier, G. W. (2007). Core self evaluations in Germany: Validation of a German measure and its relationship with career success. Manuscript submitted for publication.
144. Tett, R. P. & Burnett, D. D. (2003). A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 500-517.
145. Tewes, U. (1991). HA WIE-R - Hamburg- Wechsler Intelligenztest für Erwachsene, Revision 1991. Bern: Huber.
146. U.S. Department of Labor (1991). Dictionary of occupational titles (4th ed.). Washington: US Department of Labor.
147. Van Rooy, D. L. & Viswesvaran, C. (2004). Emotional intelligence: A meta-analytic investigation of predictive validity and nomological net. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65, 71-95.
148. Vinchur, A. J., Schippmann, J. S., Switzer, F. S. & Roth, P. L. (1998). A meta-analytic review of predictors of job performance for salespeople. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 586-597.
149. Viswesvaran, C. & Ones, D. S. (1999). Meta-analyses of fakability estimates: Implications for personality measurement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59, 197-210.
150. Wagner, R. K. & Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Practical intelligence in real-world pursuits: The role of tacit knowledge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 436-458.
151. Wilhelm, O., Schulze, R., Schmiedek, F. & Süß, H.-M. (2003). Interindividuelle Unterschiede im typischen intellektuellen Engagement. Diagnostica, 49, 49-60.