-
1
-
-
0002079293
-
The incision made in the abdominal wall in cases of appendicitis, with a description of a new method of operating
-
McBurney C. The incision made in the abdominal wall in cases of appendicitis, with a description of a new method of operating. Ann Surg. 1894;20:38.
-
(1894)
Ann Surg
, vol.20
, pp. 38
-
-
McBurney, C.1
-
2
-
-
0020679054
-
Endoscopic appendectomy
-
Semm K. Endoscopic appendectomy. Endoscopy. 1983;15:59-64.
-
(1983)
Endoscopy
, vol.15
, pp. 59-64
-
-
Semm, K.1
-
3
-
-
0023882937
-
La chirurgie digestive en France. Une enquête épidémiologique nationale (1978-1982).
-
Tiret E, Rotman N, Hatton F, et al. La chirurgie digestive en France. Une enquête épidémiologique nationale (1978-1982). Gastrenterol Clin Biol. 1988;12:354-360.
-
(1988)
Gastrenterol Clin Biol
, vol.12
, pp. 354-360
-
-
Tiret, E.1
Rotman, N.2
Hatton, F.3
-
4
-
-
17544389070
-
Recognition of a pathological appendix during laparoscopy: A prospective study of 81 cases
-
Champault G, Taffinder N, Ziol M, et al. Recognition of a pathological appendix during laparoscopy: a prospective study of 81 cases. Br J Surg. 1997;84:671.
-
(1997)
Br J Surg
, vol.84
, pp. 671
-
-
Champault, G.1
Taffinder, N.2
Ziol, M.3
-
5
-
-
0029929137
-
Laparoscopic compared with open appendicectomy for acute appendicitis: A prospective study
-
Chiarugi M, Buccianti P, Celona G, et al. Laparoscopic compared with open appendicectomy for acute appendicitis: a prospective study. Eur J Surg. 1996;162:385-390.
-
(1996)
Eur J Surg
, vol.162
, pp. 385-390
-
-
Chiarugi, M.1
Buccianti, P.2
Celona, G.3
-
6
-
-
0842348857
-
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: Outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database
-
Guller U, Hervey S, Purves H, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database. Ann Surg. 2004;239:43-52.
-
(2004)
Ann Surg
, vol.239
, pp. 43-52
-
-
Guller, U.1
Hervey, S.2
Purves, H.3
-
7
-
-
0031049980
-
Appendicite. Recommandations et references médicales.
-
Agence nationale pour le developpement de l'évaluation médicale ANDEM
-
Agence nationale pour le developpement de l'évaluation médicale (ANDEM): Appendicite. Recommandations et references médicales. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 1997;21:50-70.
-
(1997)
Gastroenterol Clin Biol
, vol.21
, pp. 50-70
-
-
-
8
-
-
0032914799
-
A meta analysis of randomised controlled trials of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy
-
Chung R. A meta analysis of randomised controlled trials of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy. Am J Surg. 1999;177:250-256.
-
(1999)
Am J Surg
, vol.177
, pp. 250-256
-
-
Chung, R.1
-
9
-
-
0036960701
-
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: Between evidence and common sense
-
Eysasch E, Sauerland S, Lefering R, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: between evidence and common sense. Dig Surg. 2002;19:518-522.
-
(2002)
Dig Surg
, vol.19
, pp. 518-522
-
-
Eysasch, E.1
Sauerland, S.2
Lefering, R.3
-
10
-
-
0031945396
-
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: A meta analysis
-
Golub R, Siddiqui F, Pohl D. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a meta analysis. J Am Coll Surg. 1998;186:545-553.
-
(1998)
J Am Coll Surg
, vol.186
, pp. 545-553
-
-
Golub, R.1
Siddiqui, F.2
Pohl, D.3
-
12
-
-
0035209730
-
Results of laparoscopic vs conventional appendectomy in complicated appendicitis
-
Wullstein C, Barkhausen S, Gross E. Results of laparoscopic vs conventional appendectomy in complicated appendicitis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44:1700-1705.
-
(2001)
Dis Colon Rectum
, vol.44
, pp. 1700-1705
-
-
Wullstein, C.1
Barkhausen, S.2
Gross, E.3
-
13
-
-
0027133647
-
Randomised contolled trial comparing laparoscopic and open appendectomy
-
Kum CK, Ngoi SS, Goh PM, et al. Randomised contolled trial comparing laparoscopic and open appendectomy. Br J Surg. 1993;80:1599-1600.
-
(1993)
Br J Surg
, vol.80
, pp. 1599-1600
-
-
Kum, C.K.1
Ngoi, S.S.2
Goh, P.M.3
-
14
-
-
0028843580
-
A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Laparoscopic Appendectomy Study Group
-
Ortega AE, Hunter JG, Peters JH, et al. A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Laparoscopic Appendectomy Study Group. Am J Surg. 1995;169:208-212.
-
(1995)
Am J Surg
, vol.169
, pp. 208-212
-
-
Ortega, A.E.1
Hunter, J.G.2
Peters, J.H.3
-
15
-
-
33745582454
-
Morbidity of laparoscopic surgery for complicated appendicitis: An international study
-
Cueto J, D'Allemagne B, Vazquez-Frias JA, et al. Morbidity of laparoscopic surgery for complicated appendicitis: an international study. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:717-720.
-
(2006)
Surg Endosc
, vol.20
, pp. 717-720
-
-
Cueto, J.1
D'Allemagne, B.2
Vazquez-Frias, J.A.3
-
16
-
-
11144316759
-
Laparoscopic appendicectomy is associated with a lower complication rate even during the introductory phase
-
Kapischke M, Tepel J, Bley K. Laparoscopic appendicectomy is associated with a lower complication rate even during the introductory phase. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2004;389:517-523.
-
(2004)
Langenbecks Arch Surg
, vol.389
, pp. 517-523
-
-
Kapischke, M.1
Tepel, J.2
Bley, K.3
-
17
-
-
24944457361
-
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: A prospective randomized double-blind study
-
Katkhouda N, Mason RJ, Towfigh S, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind study. Ann Surg. 2005;242:439-448.
-
(2005)
Ann Surg
, vol.242
, pp. 439-448
-
-
Katkhouda, N.1
Mason, R.J.2
Towfigh, S.3
-
18
-
-
0029789771
-
Laparoscopy is not recommended for routine appendectomy in men: Results of a prospective randomized study
-
Mutter D, Vix M, Bui A, et al. Laparoscopy is not recommended for routine appendectomy in men: results of a prospective randomized study. Surgery. 1996;120:71-74.
-
(1996)
Surgery
, vol.120
, pp. 71-74
-
-
Mutter, D.1
Vix, M.2
Bui, A.3
-
19
-
-
1542346404
-
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: What is the real difference? Results of a prospective randomized double-blinded trial
-
Ignacio RC, Buke R, Spencer D, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: what is the real difference? Results of a prospective randomized double-blinded trial. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:334-337.
-
(2004)
Surg Endosc
, vol.18
, pp. 334-337
-
-
Ignacio, R.C.1
Buke, R.2
Spencer, D.3
-
20
-
-
0032894488
-
Prospective randomized multicentre study of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy
-
Hellberg A, Rudberg C, Kullman E, et al. Prospective randomized multicentre study of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy. Br J Surg. 1999;86:48-53.
-
(1999)
Br J Surg
, vol.86
, pp. 48-53
-
-
Hellberg, A.1
Rudberg, C.2
Kullman, E.3
-
21
-
-
0031066338
-
Laparoscopic appendectomy - is it worthwhile? A prospective, randomized study in young women
-
Laine S, Rantala A, Gullichsen R, et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy - is it worthwhile? A prospective, randomized study in young women. Surg Endosc. 1997;11:95-97.
-
(1997)
Surg Endosc
, vol.11
, pp. 95-97
-
-
Laine, S.1
Rantala, A.2
Gullichsen, R.3
-
22
-
-
0035134135
-
Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy
-
Pedersen AG, Peterson OB, Wara P, et al. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy. Br J Surg. 2001;88:200-205.
-
(2001)
Br J Surg
, vol.88
, pp. 200-205
-
-
Pedersen, A.G.1
Peterson, O.B.2
Wara, P.3
-
23
-
-
0034780653
-
Needlescopic, laparoscopic, and open appendectomy: A comparative study
-
Huang MT, Wei PL, Wu CC, et al. Needlescopic, laparoscopic, and open appendectomy: a comparative study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percut Tech. 2001;11:306-312.
-
(2001)
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percut Tech
, vol.11
, pp. 306-312
-
-
Huang, M.T.1
Wei, P.L.2
Wu, C.C.3
-
24
-
-
0034468282
-
Intraabdominal abscess rate after laparoscopic appendectomy
-
Katkhouda N, Friedlander MH, Grant SW, et al. Intraabdominal abscess rate after laparoscopic appendectomy. Am J Surg. 2000;180:456-459.
-
(2000)
Am J Surg
, vol.180
, pp. 456-459
-
-
Katkhouda, N.1
Friedlander, M.H.2
Grant, S.W.3
-
25
-
-
0001618734
-
Intra-abdominal abscesses following laparoscopic and open appendectomies
-
Paik PS, Towson JA, Anthone GJ, et al. Intra-abdominal abscesses following laparoscopic and open appendectomies. J Gastrointest Surg. 1997;1:188-193.
-
(1997)
J Gastrointest Surg
, vol.1
, pp. 188-193
-
-
Paik, P.S.1
Towson, J.A.2
Anthone, G.J.3
-
26
-
-
0034944991
-
Comparison of laparoscopic, open, and converted appendectomy for perforated appendicitis
-
Piskun G, Kozik D, Rajpal S, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic, open, and converted appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. Surg Endoc. 2001;15:660-662.
-
(2001)
Surg Endoc
, vol.15
, pp. 660-662
-
-
Piskun, G.1
Kozik, D.2
Rajpal, S.3
-
27
-
-
0035069089
-
Laparoscopy reduces unnecessary appendicectomies and improves diagnosis in fertile women. A randomized study
-
Larsson PG, Henriksson G, Olsson M, et al. Laparoscopy reduces unnecessary appendicectomies and improves diagnosis in fertile women. A randomized study. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:200-202.
-
(2001)
Surg Endosc
, vol.15
, pp. 200-202
-
-
Larsson, P.G.1
Henriksson, G.2
Olsson, M.3
-
28
-
-
0032839135
-
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: Time to decide
-
Fingerhut A, Millat B, Borrie F. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: time to decide. World J Surg. 1999;23:835-845.
-
(1999)
World J Surg
, vol.23
, pp. 835-845
-
-
Fingerhut, A.1
Millat, B.2
Borrie, F.3
-
29
-
-
0035462822
-
What you see is not what you get. A plea to remove a "normal" appendix during diagnostic laparoscopy
-
Chiarugi M, Buccianti P, Decanini L, et al. What you see is not what you get. A plea to remove a "normal" appendix during diagnostic laparoscopy. Acta Chir Belg. 2001;101:243-245.
-
(2001)
Acta Chir Belg
, vol.101
, pp. 243-245
-
-
Chiarugi, M.1
Buccianti, P.2
Decanini, L.3
-
30
-
-
0037706769
-
Should every patient undergoing laparoscopy for clinical diagnosis of appendicitis have an appendicectomy?
-
Navez B, Therasse A. Should every patient undergoing laparoscopy for clinical diagnosis of appendicitis have an appendicectomy? Acta Chir Belg. 2003;103:87-89.
-
(2003)
Acta Chir Belg
, vol.103
, pp. 87-89
-
-
Navez, B.1
Therasse, A.2
-
31
-
-
0033869213
-
Macroscopic assessment of the appendix at diagnostic laparoscopy is reliable
-
Kraemer M, Ohmann C, Leppert R, et al. Macroscopic assessment of the appendix at diagnostic laparoscopy is reliable. Surg Endosc. 2000;14:625-633.
-
(2000)
Surg Endosc
, vol.14
, pp. 625-633
-
-
Kraemer, M.1
Ohmann, C.2
Leppert, R.3
-
32
-
-
0035133002
-
A normal appendix found during diagnostic laparoscopy should not be removed
-
Van den Boek WT, Bijnen AB, de Ruiter P, et al. A normal appendix found during diagnostic laparoscopy should not be removed. Br J Surg. 2001;88:251-254.
-
(2001)
Br J Surg
, vol.88
, pp. 251-254
-
-
Van den Boek, W.T.1
Bijnen, A.B.2
de Ruiter, P.3
-
33
-
-
0032902976
-
Does laparoscopy reduce the incidence of unnecessary appendicectomies?
-
Barrat C, Catheline JM, Rizk N, et al. Does laparoscopy reduce the incidence of unnecessary appendicectomies? Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1999;9:27-31.
-
(1999)
Surg Laparosc Endosc
, vol.9
, pp. 27-31
-
-
Barrat, C.1
Catheline, J.M.2
Rizk, N.3
-
34
-
-
0027194302
-
Randomised study of the value of laparoscopy before appendicectomy
-
Olsen JB, Myren CJ, Haahr PE. Randomised study of the value of laparoscopy before appendicectomy. Br J Surg. 1993;80:922-923.
-
(1993)
Br J Surg
, vol.80
, pp. 922-923
-
-
Olsen, J.B.1
Myren, C.J.2
Haahr, P.E.3
-
35
-
-
0041858005
-
The utility of laparoscopy in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in women of reproductive age
-
Van Dalen R, Bagshaw PF, Dobbs BR, et al. The utility of laparoscopy in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in women of reproductive age. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:1311-1313.
-
(2003)
Surg Endosc
, vol.17
, pp. 1311-1313
-
-
Van Dalen, R.1
Bagshaw, P.F.2
Dobbs, B.R.3
-
36
-
-
0029973508
-
What are abdominal painful syndromes of unexplained origin? Prospective study: 99 patients followed for three years
-
Champault G, Lauroy J, Guillon P, et al. What are abdominal painful syndromes of unexplained origin? Prospective study: 99 patients followed for three years. Ann Chir. 1996;50:258-262.
-
(1996)
Ann Chir
, vol.50
, pp. 258-262
-
-
Champault, G.1
Lauroy, J.2
Guillon, P.3
|