"Eat your hamburger!"-"No, i don't want to!" Argumentation and argumentative development in the context of dinner conversation in Twenty Swedish families

Argumentation

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 251-271

  Brumark, Åsa ^a  

^a SÖDERTÖRN UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Argumentation; Family discourse; Language acquisition; Natural conversation

Indexed keywords

EID: 42449150452     PISSN: 0920427X     EISSN: 15728374     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10503-007-9061-z     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Bakhtin, M. 1986. Speech genres and other late essays. In Austin, eds. C. Emerson and M. Holquist. Texas: University of Texas Press.
2. Benoit, J.P. 1992. The use of argument by preschool children: The emergent production of rules for winning arguments. In Readings in argumentation 11, eds. W.L. Benoit, D. Hample, and P.J. Benoit. Berlin: Studies of argumentation in pragmatics and discourse analysis, Foris Publications.
3. Blum-Kulka, S. 1997. Dinner talk. Cultural patterns of sociability and socialization in family discourse. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4. Brumark, Å. 1989. Blindness and the context of language acquisition. MINS 31. Diss. Stockholm University.
5. Brumark, Å. 2003. Democracy starts at the dinner table. Working Papers, Södertörn University College, Huddinge.
6. Brumark, Å. 2006. Non-observance of Gricean maxims in family dinner table conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 38: 1206-1238.
7. Bruner, J.S. 1981. The social context of language acquisition. Language and Communication 1: 155-178.
8. Corsaro, W.A., and Rizzo, T.A. 1990, Disputes in peer culture of American and Italian nursery-school children. In Conflict talk: Sociolinguistic investigations of arguments in conversations, ed. A.D. Grimshaw, 118-138. New York: Cambridge University Press.
9. Eisenberg, A., and Garvey, C. 1981. Children's use of verbal strategies in resolving conflicts. Discourse Processes 4: 149-170.
10. Englund, T. 2000. Deliberativa samtal som värdegrund - historiska perspektiv och aktuella förutsättningar. Stockholm: Statens skolverk.
11. Felton, M., and Kuhn, D. 2001. The development of argumentative discourse skill. Discourse Processes, 32 (2&3): 135-153.
12. Garvey, C. 1979. Contingent queries and their relations in discourse. In Developmental pragmatics, eds. E. Ochs and B. Schieffelin. Academic Press: New York.
13. Goffman, E. 1974. Frame analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14. Goodwin, M.H. 1983. Aggravated correction and disagreement in children's conversation. Journal of Pragmatics VII (6).
15. Grice, H.P. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts, eds. P. Cole and J. Morgan, 41-58. New York: Academic Press.
16. Jackson, S., and Jacobs, S. 1992. Structure of conversational argument: Pragmatic bases for the enthymeme. In Readings in argumentation 11, eds. W.L. Benoit, D. Hample, and P.J. Benoit. Berlin: Studies of argumentation in pragmatics and discourse analysis, Foris Publications.
17. Linell, P. 1998. Approaching dialogue: Talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
18. Linell, P., and Gustavsson, L. 1987. Initiativ och respons: Om dialogens dynamic, dominans och coherens, SIC 15. Linköping: Department of Communication Studies.
19. Mac Whinney. 1991. The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. Maynard, D.W. 1985. How children start arguments. Language in Society 14: 1-29.
21. Öberg, B.-M. 1995. Negotiation processes as talk and interaction. Interaction analyses of informal negotiations, Diss, Linköping University, Linköping.
22. Pontecorvo, C., Fasulo, A. 1997. Learning to argue in family dinner conversation: The reconstruction of past events. In Discourse tools and reasoning, eds. L. Resnick, R. Saljo, and C. Pontecorvo. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
23. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organisation of turn-taking in conversation. Language 50: 696-735.
24. Schegloff, E.A. 1990. On the organisation of sequences as a source of "coherence" in talk-in-interaction. In Conversational organization and its development, ed. B. Dorval. Norwood, NJ: Albex.
25. Schiffrin, D. 1985. Everyday argument. The organization of diversity in talk. In Handbook of discourse analysis, Vol. 3. London: Academic Press.
26. Snow, C. 1978. The conversational context of language acquisition. In Recent advances in the psychology of languages, eds. R. Campbell and P. Smith. Plenum Press: New York.
27. Snow, C.E., and Goldfield, B.A. 1983. Turn the page please: Situation specific language acquisition. Journal of Child Language 10: 551-569.
28. Trapp, R., 1992. Everyday argumentation from an interpretative perspective. In Readings in argumentation 11, eds. W.L. Benoit, D. Hample, and P.J. Benoit. Berlin: Studies of argumentation in pragmatics and discourse analysis, Foris Publications.
29. van Eemeren, F.H. 2001. The state of the art in the argumentation theory. In Crucial concepts in argumentation theory, ed. F.H. van Eemeren. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
30. van Eemeren, F., Grootendorst, R., & Snoeck Henkemans, F. 2002. Argumentation. Analysis, Evaluation, Presentation. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
31. van Eemeren, F.H., Grootendorst, R., Jackson, S., and Jacobs, S. 1993. Reconstructing argumentative discourse. London: The University of Alabama Press.
32. van Rees, A. Argument interpretation and reconstruction. In Crucial concepts in argumentation theory, ed. F.H. van Eemeren. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
33. Vuchinich, S. 1990. The sequential organization of closing in verbal family conflict. In Conflict talk: Sociolinguistic investigations of arguments in conversations, ed. A.D. Grimshaw. New York: Cambridge University Press, 118-138.
34. Vygotskij, L.S. 1962. Thought and language. MIT Press, Cambridge.
35. Wagner, J. 1995. What makes discourse a negotiation? In The discourse of business negotiation, eds. K. Ehlich and J. Wagner. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyer.
36. Wallgren Hemlin, B. 2001. Overall på, Retorikmagasinet.
37. Walton, D. 2000. Scare tactics: Arguments that appeal to fear and threats. Argumentation 18(2): 261-269.
38. Weger, H. 2002. Violating pragma-dialectical rules in arguments between intimates. In Advances in pragma-dialectics, ed. F.H. van Eemeren. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
39. Wiksten Folkeryd, J. 1998. The acquisition of genres: Some findings from an investigation in Swedish families. RUUL 33: 89-122.
40. Wirdenäs, K. 2002. Ungdomars argumentation. Om argumentationstekniker i gruppsamta, Nordistica Gothenburgensia. Acta Universitatis Gothenburensis. Göteborgs Universitet.