Autogenous standard versus inside-out vein graft to repair facial nerve in rabbits

Chinese Journal of Traumatology - English Edition

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 104-109

  Tang, Jie ^a   Wang, Xue Mei ^a   Hu, Jing ^a   Luo, En ^a   Qi, Meng Chun ^a  

^a SICHUAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Facial nerve; Nerve regeneration; Tissue graft; Tubulization

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; AUTOGRAFT; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; FACIAL NERVE DISEASE; FACIAL NERVE SURGERY; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HISTOLOGY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; NERVE REGENERATION; NONHUMAN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; RABBIT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT RESPONSE; VEIN GRAFT;

EID: 42449145512     PISSN: 10081275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1008-1275(08)60022-X     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Chiu DT, Janecka I, Krizek TJ, et al. Autogenous vein graft as a conduit for nerve regeneration. Surgery 1982; 91(2): 226-233.
2. Barcelos AS, Rodrigues AC, Silva MD, et al. Inside-out vein graft and inside-out artery graft in rat sciatic nerve repair. Microsurg 2003; 23(1):66-71.
3. Gravvanis AI, Tsoutsos DA, Tagaris GA, et al. Beneficial effect of nerve growth factor-7S on peripheral nerve regeneration through inside-out vein grafts: an experimental study. Microsurg 2004; 24(5):408-415.
4. Kelleher MO, Al-Abri RK, Eleuteìo ML, et al. The use of conventional and invaginated autologous vein grafts for nerve repair by means of entubulation. Br J Plast Surg 2001; 54(1):53-57.
5. Keskin M, Akbas H, Uysal OA, et al. Enhancement of nerve regeneration and orientation across a gap with a nerve graft within a vein conduit graft: a functional, stereological, and electrophysiological study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 113(5):1372-1379.
6. Pogrel MA, Maghen A. The use of autogenous vein grafts for inferior alveolar and lingual nerve reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001; 59(9):985-993.
7. Wang KK, Costas PD, Bryan DJ, et al. Inside-out vein graft promotes improved nerve regeneration in rats. Microsurg 1993; 14(9):608-618.
8. Wang J, Goodger NM, Pogrel MA. A method of invaginating the facial vein for inferior alveolar nerve repair. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003; 61(7):848-849.
9. Gilad VH, Tetzlaff WG, Rabey JM, et al. Accelerated recovery following polyamines and aminoguanidine treatment after facial nerve injury in rats. Brain Res 1996; 724(1):141-144.
10. Rodrigues Ade C, Silva MD. Inside-out versus standard artery graft to repair a sensory nerve in rats. Microsurgery 2001; 21(3):102-107.
11. Battiston B, Tos P, Geuna S. Nerve repair by means of vein filled with muscle grafts: morphological analysis of regeneration. Microsurgery 2000; 20(1):37-41.
12. Ulkur E, Yuksel F, Acikel C, et al. Comparison of functional results of nerve graft, vein graft, and vein filled with muscle graft in end-to-side neurorrhaphy. Microsurgery 2003; 23(1):40-48
13. Ferrari F, De Castro Rodrigues, A, Malvezzi CK, et al. Insied-out vs. standard vein graft to repair a sensory nerve in rats. Anat Rec. 1999; 256(3):227-232.
14. Benito-Ruiz J, Navarro-Monzonis A, Piqueras A, et al. Invaginated vein graft as nerve conduit: an experimental study. Microsurgery 1994; 15(2):105-115.
15. Wei X, Lao J, Gu YD. Bridging peripheral nerve defect with chitosan-collagen film. Chin J Traumatol 2003; 6(3):131-134.
16. Lloyd BM, Luginbuhl RD, Brenner MJ, et al. Use of motor nerve material in peripheral nerve repair with conduits. Microsurgery 2007; 27(2):138-145
17. Moran CJ, Neely JG. Patterns of facial nerve synkinesis. Laryngoscope 1996; 106(12 pt 1):1491-1496.
18. Park HJ, Kim HN, Kim KM. Redistribution of facial nerve motor neurons after recovery from nerve crushing injury in the gerbil. Acta Otolaryngol 1995; 115(2):273-275.
19. Weber RA, Breidenbach WC, Brown RE, et al. Arandomized prospective study of polyglycolic acid conduits for digital nerve reconstruction in humans. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 106 (5):1036-1048.
20. Spector JG. Neural repair in facial paralysis: clinical and experimental studies. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1997; 254 suppl 1: S68-75.