Direct and indirect induction of a compensatory phenotype that alleviates the costs of an inducible defense

PLoS ONE

Volumn 2, Issue 10, 2007, Pages

  Iwami, Tadashi ^a   Kishida, Osamu ^a,b   Nishimura, Kinya ^a  

^a HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEFENSIVE BEHAVIOR; GILL; HYPOXIA; LARVA; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; PREDATION; SALAMANDER; ADAPTATION; AMPHIBIA; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CELL COMMUNICATION; ENVIRONMENT; EVOLUTION; FOOD CHAIN; METABOLISM; PHENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGY; RISK;

ANISOPTERA (DRAGONFLIES); HYNOBIUS RETARDATUS; SALAMANDROIDEA;

OXYGEN;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; CELL COMMUNICATION; ENVIRONMENT; EVOLUTION; FOOD CHAIN; LARVA; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; OXYGEN; PHENOTYPE; PREDATORY BEHAVIOR; RISK; URODELA;

EID: 42449137569     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001084     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Edmunds M (1974) Defence in animals: A survey of anti-predator derences. Essex, England: Longman. 357 p.
2. Tollrian R, Harvell CD (1999) The ecology and evolution of inducible defenses. Princeton, New Jersey, USA: Princeton University Press. 383 p.
3. Dodson SI (1974) Adaptive change in plankton morphology in response to size-selection predation: A new hypothesis of cyclomorphosis. Limnology and Occanograph 19: 721-729.
4. Kishida O, Mizuta Y, Nishimura K (2006) Reciprocal phenotypic plasticity in a predator-prey interaction between larval amphibians. Ecology 87: 1599-1604.
5. Lima SL, Dill LM (1990) Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation-a review and prospectus. Canadian Journal of Zoology-Revue Canadienne De Zoologie 68: 619-640.
6. Anholt BR, Werner EE (1995) Interaction between food availability and predation mortality mediated by adaptive-behavior. Ecology 76: 2230-2234.
7. Skelly DK (1992) Field evidence for a cost of behavioral antipredator response in a larval amphibian. Ecology 73: 704-708.
8. Lind J, Cresswell W (2005) Determining the fitness consequences of antipredation behavior. Behavioral Ecology 16: 945-956.
9. Andersson J, Johansson F, Soderlund T (2006) Interactions between predator-and diet-induced phenotypic changes in body shape of crucian carp. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 273: 431-437.
10. Schmidt BR, Ramer N, Van Buskirk J (2006) A trophic polymorphism induced by both predators and prey. Evolutionary Ecology Research 8: 1301-1309.
11. Stoks R, De Block M, Van de Meutter F, Johansson F (2005) Predation cost of rapid growth: behavioural coupling and physiological decoupling. Journal of Animal Ecology 74: 708-715.
12. Vonesh JR, Bolker BM (2005) Compensatory larval responses shift trade-offs associated with predator-induced hatching plasticity. Ecology 86: 1580-1591.
13. McIntyre PB, McCollum SA (2000) Responses of bullfrog tadpoles to hypoxia and predators. Occologia 125: 301-308.
14. Skelly DK (1994) Activity level and the susceptibility of anuran larvae to predation. Animal Behaviour 47: 465-468.
15. Ultsch GR, Bradford DF (1999) Physiology: Coping with the environment. In: McFiarmid RW, Altig R, eds. Tadpoles: The biology of anuran larvae. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. pp 189-214.
16. Crowder WC, Nie ME, Ultsch GR (1998) Oxygen uptake in bullfrog tadpoles (Rana catesbeiana). Journal of Experimental Zoology 280: 121-134.
17. Feder ME (1983) Responses to acute aquatic hypoxia in larvae of the frog Rana berlandien. Journal of Experimental Biology 104: 79-95.
18. Weber JM, Kramer DL (1983) Effects of hypoxia and surface access on growth, mortality, and behavior of juvenile guppies, Poecilia reticulata. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 40: 1583-1588.
19. Bond AN (1960) An analysis of the response of salamander gills to changes in the oxygen concentration of the medium. Developmental Biology 2: 1-20.
20. Burggren W, Mwalukoma A (1983) Respiration during chronic hypoxia and hyperoxia in larval and aduh bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana). I. Morphological responses of lungs, skin and gills. Journal of Experimental Biology 105: 191-203.
21. 2 consumption of aquatic salamanders. Respiration Physiology 26: 357-369.
22. Whitford WG, Hutchinson VH (1965) Gas exchange in salamanders. Physiological Zoology 38: 228-242.
23. Dewitt TJ, Scheiner SM (2004) Phenotypic plasticity: functional and conceptual approaches. New York, New York, USA: Oxford University Press.
24. West NH, Burggren WW (1982) Gill and lung ventilatory responses to steady-state aquatic hypoxia and hyperoxia in the bullfrog tadpole. Respiration Physiology 47: 165-176
25. Wood SC (1980) Adaptation of red-blood-cell function to hypoxia and temperature in ectothermic vertebrates. American Zoologist 20: 163-172.
26. Clark CW, Harvell CD (1992) Inducible Defenses and the Allocation of Resources-a Minimal Model. American Naturalist 139: 521-539.
27. Kishida O, Nishimura K (2006) Flexible architecture of inducible morphological plasticity. Journal of Animal Ecology 75: 705-712.
28. Iwasawa H, Yamashita K (1991) Normal stages of development of a Hynobiid Salamander, Hynobius nigrescens Slegneger. Japanes Journal of Herpetology 14: 39-62.