Reliability of the instrument for classifying elderly people's capacity for self-care;Confiabiildade do instrumento para classificação de idosos quanto à capacidade para o autocuidado

Revista de Saude Publica

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 317-323

  de Almeida, Maria Helena Morgani ^a   Spínola, Aracy Witt de Pinho ^a   Iwamizu, Paula Stefanoni ^a   Okura, Roberta Irie Sumi ^a   Barroso, Lucia Pereira ^a   de Lima, Antonio Carlos Pedroso ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Aged; Classification; Disability evaluation; Occupational therapy; Reproductivity of results; Self care

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SELF CARE; STATISTICS;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SELF CARE;

EID: 42449126000     PISSN: 00348910     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s0034-89102008000200018     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Almeida MHM. Elaboração e validação do instrumento CICAc: classificação de idosos quanto à capacidade para o autocuidado. Rev Ter Ocup. 2004;15(3):112-20.
2. Baltes MM. Successful ageing. In: Ebrahim S, Kalache A, editores. Epidemiology in old age. London: BMJ Publishing Group; 1996. p. 162-8.
3. Faro ACM. Técnica Delphi na validação das intervenções de enfermagem. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 1997; 31(2):259-73.
4. Fletcher RH, Fletcher SW, Wagner EH. Clinical epidemiology: The essentials. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1996.
5. Horgas AL, Wilms HU, Baltes MM. Daily life in very old age: everyday activities as expression of successful living. Gerontologist. 1998;38(5):556-68.
6. Kalache A, Veras RP, Ramos RL. O envelhecimento da população mundial: um desafio novo. Rev Saude Publica. 1987;21(3):200-10.
7. Litvak J. El envejecimiento de la población: un desafio que va más allá del aão 2000. Bol Oficina Sanit Panam. 1990;109(1):1-5.
8. McDowell I, Newell C. Measuring health: a guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires. Oxford; Oxford University Press; 1987.
9. McSweeny AJ, Creer TL. Health-related quality-of-life assessment in medical care. Dis Mon. 1995;41(1):16-20.
10. Nunnally JC. Psychometric Theory. 2.ed. New York; McGraw-Hill; 1978.
11. Restrepo HE, Perez EA. Promoción de la salud, de los ancianos. In: Anzola Perez E, Galinsk D, Morales Martinez F, Salas A, Sánchez Ayéndez M, organizadores. La atención de los ancianos: un desafio para los años noventa. Washington: OMS/OPS; 1994 (OPS - Publicación Cientifica, 546). p.383-8.
12. Sherman FT. Functional assessment. Easy-to-use screening tools speed initial office work-up. Geriatrics. 2001;56(8):36-40.
13. Tuokko H, Hadjistavropoulos T, Miller JA, Bettie BL. The Clock Test: A sensitive measure to differentiate normal elderly from those with Alzheimer disease. J Am Geriatric Soc. 1992;40(6):579-84.
14. Williams PL, Webb C. The Delphi technique: a methodological discussion. J Adv Nurs. 1994;19(1):180-6.