Use of vascular clamping in hepatic surgery: Lessons learned from 1260 liver resections - Invited critique

Archives of Surgery

Volumn 143, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 388-

  Imagawa, David K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; LIVER RESECTION; LIVER SURGERY; MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; NOTE; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK FACTOR; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

EID: 42449124845     PISSN: 00040010     EISSN: 15383644     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.143.4.388     Document Type: Note

References (5)

1. Jarnagin WR, Gonen M, Fong Y, et al. Improvement in perioperative outcome alter hepatic resection: analysis of 1803 consecutive cases over the past decade. Ann Surg. 2002;236(4):397-407.
2. Poon RT, Fan ST, Lo CM, et al. Improving perioperative outcome expands the role of hepatectomy in management of benign and malignant hepatobiliary diseases: analysis of 1222 consecutive patients from a prospective database. Ann Surg. 2004;240(4):698-710.
3. Belghiti J, Noun R, Zante E, Ballet T, Sauvanet A. Portal triad clamping or hepatic vascular exclusion for major liver resection: a controlled study. Ann Surg. 1996;224(2):155-161.
4. Belghiti J, Noun R, Malafosse R, et al. Continuous versus intermittent portal triad clamping for liver resection: a controlled study. Ann Surg. 1999;229(3):369-375.
5. Man K, Fan ST, Ng IO, Lo CM, Liu CL, Wong J. Prospective evaluation of Pringle maneuver in hepatectomy for liver tumors by a randomized study. Ann Surg. 1997;226(6):704-711.