Computer-assisted surgical planning and image-guided surgical navigation in refractory adult scoliosis surgery: Case report and review of the literature

Spine

Volumn 33, Issue 9, 2008, Pages

  Metz, Lionel N ^a   Burch, Shane ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer assisted surgical planning; Kyphosis; Osteotomy; Revision spine surgery; Scoliosis; Spine; Surgical navigation; Three dimensional CT reconstruction

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMAGING; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; KYPHOSCOLIOSIS; OPERATING ROOM; OSTEOTOMY; PAIN; PATIENT SAFETY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPINAL CORD DISEASE; SPINE SURGERY; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TREATMENT PLANNING; VERTEBRECTOMY; VIRTUAL REALITY; BACKACHE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER INTERFACE; DECOMPRESSION SURGERY; HOSPITALIZATION; INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY; KYPHOSIS; METHODOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; REOPERATION; REVIEW; SCOLIOSIS; SPINE FUSION; SPIRAL COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; TREATMENT FAILURE; VERTEBRA;

ADULT; BACK PAIN; DECOMPRESSION, SURGICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; KYPHOSIS; OSTEOTOMY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RADIOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL; REOPERATION; SCOLIOSIS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SPINAL CORD DISEASES; SPINAL FUSION; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; THORACIC VERTEBRAE; TOMOGRAPHY, SPIRAL COMPUTED; TREATMENT FAILURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 42449116237     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816d256e     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Vannier MW, Marsh JL. Three-dimensional imaging, surgical planning, and image-guided therapy. Radiol Clin North Am 1996;34:545-63.
2. Acosta FLJ, Thompson TL, Campbell S, et al. Use of intraoperative isocentric c-arm 3d fluoroscopy for sextant percutaneous pedicle screw placement: case report and review of the literature. Spine J 2005;5:339-43.
3. Foley KT, Simon DA, Rampersaud YR. Virtual fluoroscopy: computer-assisted fluoroscopic navigation. Spine 2001;26:347-51.
4. Gebhard F, Weidner A, Liener UC, et al. Navigation at the spine. Injury 2004;35(suppl 1):S-A35-A45.
5. Glossop ND, Hu RW, Randle JA. Computer-aided pedicle screw placement using frameless stereotaxis. Spine 1996;21:2026-34.
6. Holly LT, Foley KT. Intraoperative spinal navigation. Spine 2003;28:S54-S61.
7. Laine T, Schlenzka D, Mäkitalo K, et al. Improved accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with computer-assisted surgery. A prospective clinical trial of 30 patients. Spine 1997;22:1254-8.
8. Laine T, Lund T, Ylikoski M, et al. Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with and without computer assistance: a randomised controlled clinical study in 100 consecutive patients. Eur Spine J 2000;9:235-40.
9. Merloz P, Tonetti J, Eid A, et al. Computer assisted spine surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997;337:86-96.
10. Schlenzka D, Laine T, Lund T. Computer-assisted spine surgery. Eur Spine J 2000;9(suppl 1):S57-S64.
11. Gill-Robinson H, Elias J, Bender F, et al. Using image analysis software to create a physical skull model for the facial reconstruction of a wrapped akhmimic mummy. J Comput Inf Technol 2006;14:45.
12. Landry C, De Guise JA, Dansereau J, et al. Computer graphic analysis of the three dimensional deformities of scoliotic vertebrae. Ann Chir 1997;51:868-74.
13. Vahlensieck M, Lang P, Chan W, et al. Three-dimensional reconstruction. Eur Radiol 1992;2:503-7.
14. Hughes LO, McCarthy RE, Glasier CM. Segmental spinal dysgenesis: a report of three cases. J Pediatr Orthop 1998;18:227-32.
15. Mitulescu A, Skalli W, Mitton D, et al. Three-dimensional surface rendering reconstruction of scoliotic vertebrae using a non stereo-corresponding points technique. Eur Spine J 2002;11:344-52.
16. Wicht L, Schedel H, Benndorf G, et al. 3-dimensional post-myelographic ct reconstruction in diagnosis and therapy planning of spinal dysraphism. Aktuelle Radiol 1996;6:144-7.
17. Freidel K, Petermann F, Reichel D, et al. Quality of life in women with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2002;27:E87-E91.
18. Kostuik JP, Bentivoglio J. The incidence of low-back pain in adult scoliosis. Spine 1981;6:268-73.
19. Nachemson A. Adult scoliosis and back pain. Spine 1979;4:513-7.
20. Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Spratt KF, et al. Health and function of patients with untreated idiopathic scoliosis: a 50-year natural history study. JAMA 2003;289:559-67.
21. Bradford DS, Tay BK, Hu SS. Adult scoliosis: surgical indications, operative management, complications, and outcomes. Spine 1999; 24:2617-29.
22. Fang A, Hu SS, Endres N, et al. Risk factors for infection after spinal surgery. Spine 2005;30:1460-5.
23. Gumbs AA, Hanan S, Yue JJ, et al. Revision open anterior approaches for spine procedures. Spine J 2007;7:280-5.
24. Pateder DB, Kostuik JP. Lumbar nerve root palsy after adult spinal deformity surgery. Spine 2005;30:1632-6.
25. Danielsson AJ, Wiklund I, Pehrsson K, et al. Health-related quality of life in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a matched follow-up at least 20 years after treatment with brace or surgery. Eur Spine J 2001;10:278-88.
26. Jackson RP, Simmons EH, Stripinis D. Incidence and severity of back pain in adult idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1983;8:749-56.
27. Faraj AA, Webb JK. Early complications of spinal pedicle screw. Eur Spine J 1997;6:324-6.
28. Resnick DK. Prospective comparison of virtual fluoroscopy to fluoroscopy and plain radiographs for placement of lumbar pedicle screws. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003;16:254-60.
29. Sakai Y, Matsuyama Y, Yoshihara H, et al. Simultaneous registration with ct-fluoro matching for spinal navigation surgery. a case report. Nagoya J Med Sci 2006;68:45-52.
30. Spangenberg P, Coenen V, Gilsbach JM, et al. Virtual placement of posterior c1-c2 transarticular screw fixation. Neurosurg Rev 2006;29:114-7.
31. Bonnier L, Ayadi K, Vasdev A, et al. Three-dimensional reconstruction in routine computerized tomography of the skull and spine. Experience based on 161 cases. J Neuroradiol 1991;18:250-66.
32. Newton PO, Hahn GW, Fricka KB, et al. Utility of three-dimensional and multiplanar reformatted computed tomography for evaluation of pediatric congenital spine abnormalities. Spine 2002;27:844-50.