Design variables and fitting philosophies of reverse geometry lenses

Orthokeratology: Principles and Practice

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 69-107

  Mountford, John ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 42449115903     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-7506-4007-7.50006-4     Document Type: Chapter

References (44)

1. Atkinson TCO A re-appraisal of the concept of fitting rigid hard lenses by the tear layer and edge clearance technique. Journal of the British Contact Lens Association 1984, 7:106-110.
2. Atkinson TCO Computer assisted and clinical assessment of current trends in gas permeable design. Optician 1985, 189(4976):16-22.
3. Bara C (2000) Mechanism of action of the reverse geometry gas permeable contact lens in orthokeratology. MSc thesis, University of Melbourne.
4. Bibby MM Factors affecting peripheral curve design. Part 2. American Journal of Optometry 1979, 56:618-627.
5. Brand RJ, Polse KA, Schwalbe JS The Berkeley orthokeratology study. Part 1. Genera conduct of the study. American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics 1983, 60:175-186.
6. Caroline P, Campbell R Between the lines. Contact Lens Spectrum 1991, 5(6):68.
7. Chan JS, Mandell RB, Johnson L, Reed C, Fusaro R Contact lens base curve predictions from videokeratoscopy. Optometry and Vision Science 1998, 75(6):445-449.
8. Cho P, Lam AK, Mountford J, Ng L The performance of four different corneal topographers on normal human corneas and its impact on orthokeratology lens fitting. Optometry and Vision Science 2002, 79:175-183.
9. Coon LJ Orthokeratology part 2. Evaluating the Tabb method. Journal of the American Optometric Association 1984, 55:409-418.
10. Corneal refractive therapy fitting manual (2001) Paragon Vision Sciences.
11. Day J Clinical problem solving the 4-zone series 1998, NERF, Chicago.
12. Day J, Reim T, Bard RD, McGonagill P, Gambino MJ Advanced ortho- k using custom lens design. Contact Lens Spectrum 1997, 12(6):34-40.
13. Douthwaite WA Computerized contact lens fitting. Optometry and Vision Science 1991, 68:770-775.
14. El Hage S G (1997) Aspheric optical molds for continuous reshaping the cornea based on topographical analysis. US Patents Office. Patent No. 5 695 507.
15. El Hage SG, Leach N, Colliac J-P, Dezard X Interactive software controls corneal shaping. Contact Lens Spectrum 1997, 12(8):54-56.
16. Fontana A Orthokeratology using the one-piece bifocal. Contacto 1972, 22(5):9-12.
17. Guillon M, Sammons WA Contact lens design. Contact lens practice 1994, 87-103. Chapman and Hall Medical, London. M. Ruben, M. Guillon (Eds.).
18. Guillon M, Lyndon DPM, Sammons WA Designing rigid gas permeable contact lenses using the edge clearance technique. British Contact Lens Association 1983, 6(19):22-26.
19. Guillon M, Lyndon DPM, Wilson C Corneal topography: a clinical model. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 1986, 6:47-56.
20. Hayashi T Mechanics of contact lens motion. PhD thesis 1977, University Of California, Berkeley.
21. Jessen GN Orthofocus techniques. Contacto 1962, 6(7):200-204.
22. Keiley PM, Smith G, Carney LG The mean shape of the human cornea. Optica Acta 1982, 29:1027-1040.
23. Kerns R Research in orthokeratology, part 7. Journal of the American Optometric Association 1976, 48:1541-1553.
24. Kwok LS Calculation and application of the anterior surface area of a model human cornea. Journal of Theoretical Biology 1984, 108:295-313.
25. Lam AKC, Douthwaite WA Derivation of corneal flattening factor, p-value. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 1994, 14:423-427.
26. Lindsay R, Smith G, Atchinson D Descriptors of corneal shape. Optometry and Vision Science 1997, 75(2):156-158.
27. Lui WO, Edwards MH Orthokeratology in low myopia. Part 2: Corneal topographic changes and safety over 100 days. Contact Lens and Anterior Eye 2000, 23(3):90-99.
28. Luk BMW, Bennett ES, Barr JT Fitting orthokeratology contact lenses. Contact Lens Spectrum 2001, 16(10):30-35.
29. Mandell R B, Corzene J C, Klein S A (1998) Peripheral corneal topography and the limbus. ARVO Abstract no. 4789. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science.
30. McMonnies CW, Boneham GC Corneal topography validity and reliability for orthokeratology fitting. Clinical and Experimental Optometry 1997, 80(2):69-73.
31. Mountford JA Orthokeratology. Contact lenses: a textbook for students and practitioner 1997, vol. 4. Butterworths, London. A.J. Phillips, L. Speedwell (Eds.).
32. Mountford JA An analysis of the changes in corneal shape and refractive error induced by accelerated orthokeratology. ICLC 1997, 24:128-143.
33. Munnerlyn CR, Koons SJ, Marshall J Photorefractive keratectomy: a technique for laser refractive surgery. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 1988, 14:46-51.
34. Nichols JJ, Marsich BGS, Bullimore MA A comparison of two different corneal topographers in orthokeratology base curve selection. Optometry and Vision Science 1998, 75(12s):172.
35. Reim T (1999) Patent no. 5 963 297. US Patent and Trademark Office.
36. Sammons W A (1984) Lens-eye geometry. Proceedings of the European Contact Lens Society of Ophthalmology of Helsinki.
37. Smolek MK, Klyce SD Surface area of the cornea appears to be conserved in keratoconus. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 1998, 39(suppl.).
38. Swarbrick HA, Wong G, O'Leary DJ Corneal response to orthokeratology. Optometry and Vision Science 1998, 75(11):791-799.
39. Thomas PH Conoid contact lenses 1967, Corneal Lens Corporation, Sydney, Australia.
40. Wilms KH, Rabbetts RB Practical concepts of corneal topography. Optician 1997, 174(4502):7-13.
41. Winkler TD, Kame RT Orthokeratology handbook 1995, Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston.
42. Wlodyga RJ, Bryla C Corneal molding, the easy way. Contact Lens Spectrum 1989, 4(58):14-16.
43. Young G Fluorescein fit in rigid lens evaluation. International Contact Lens Clinic 1988, 15(3):95-110.
44. Young G The effect of rigid lens design on fluorescein fit. Contact Lens and Anterior Eye 1998, 21(2):41-46.