Contrast volume reduction with superior vena cava catheter-directed coronary CT angiography: Comparison with peripheral IV contrast enhancement in a swine model

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 190, Issue 4, 2008, Pages

  Shetty, Anil N ^a   Bis, Kostaki G ^a   Vyas, Amit R ^a   Kumar, Arun ^a   Anderson, Andrew ^a   Balasubramaniam, Mamtha ^a  

^a WILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Catheter angiography; Coronary artery angiography; CT angiography; Reduced contrast burden; Superior vena cava approach

Indexed keywords

IODINATED CONTRAST MEDIUM; CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH HAZARD; HEART CATHETER; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY DISEASE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SUPERIOR CAVA VEIN; SWINE; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ANIMAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; INTRAVENOUS DRUG ADMINISTRATION; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ANIMALS; CONTRAST MEDIA; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INJECTIONS, INTRAVENOUS; LEAST-SQUARES ANALYSIS; LINEAR MODELS; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SWINE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; VENA CAVA, SUPERIOR;

EID: 42449113678     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.07.3254     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Pannu HK, Flohr TG, Corl FM, Fishman EK. Current concepts in multi-detector row CT evaluation of the coronary arteries: principles, techniques, and anatomy. RadioGraphics 2003; 23[spec no]:S111-S125
2. Schoeph UJ, Becker CR, Ohnesorge BM, Yucel EK. CT of coronary artery disease. Radiology 2004; 232:18-37
3. Hoffmann U, Ferencik M, Cury RC, Pena AJ. Coronary CT angiography. J Nucl Med 2006; 47:797-806
4. Hoffmann MH, Shi H, Schmitz BL, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography with multislice computed tomography. JAMA 2005; 293:2471-2478
5. Hoffmann MH, Shi H, Schmid FT, Gelman H, Brambs HJ, Aschoff AJ. Noninvasive coronary imaging with MDCT in comparison with invasive conventional coronary angiography: a fast developing technology. AJR 2004; 182:601-608
6. Achenbach S, Giesler T, Ropers D, et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses by contrast-enhanced, retrospectively electrocardiographically gated multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 2001; 103:2535-2538
7. Nakanishi T, Kayashima Y, Inoue R, Sumii K, Gomyo Y. Pitfalls in 16-detector row CT of the coronary arteries. RadioGraphics 2005; 25:425-438
8. Choi HS, Choi BW, Choe KO, et al. Pitfalls, artifacts, and remedies in multi-detector row CT coronary angiography. RadioGraphics 2004; 24:787-800
9. Waybill MM, Waybill PN. Contrast media-induced nephrotoxicity: identification of patients at risk and algorithms for prevention. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2001; 12:3-9
10. Rihal CS, Textor SC, Grill DE, et al. Incidence and prognostic importance of acute renal failure after percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation 2002; 105:2259-2264
11. Rudnick MR, Goldfarb S, Wexler L, et al. Nephrotoxicity of ionic and nonionic contrast media in 1196 patients: a randomized trial. Kidney Int 1995; 47:254-261
12. Schrader R. Contrast material-induced renal failure: an overview. J Interv Card 2005; 18:417-423
13. Madyoon H, Croushore L, Weaver D, Mathur V. Use of fenoldopam to prevent radiocontrast nephropathy in high-risk patients. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001; 53:341-345
14. McCullough PA, Wolyn R, Rocher LL, Levin RN, O'Neill WW. Acute renal failure after coronary intervention: incidence, risk factors and relationship to mortality. Am J Med 1997; 103:368-375
15. Bis KG, Shetty AN, Brewington S, et al. Coronary 64-slice computed tomographic angiography models employing aortic root and selective catheter directed contrast enhancement in swine: technical feasibility and preliminary results using 3D and 4D reconstructions. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2004; 20:517-531
16. Bis KG, Shetty AN, Brewington S, O'Neill W. Catheter contrast-enhanced coronary CT angiography using an aortic root injection: preliminary technical development in four patients. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2004; 20:541-547
17. Kumar A, Bis KG, Shetty A, et al. Aortic root catheter-directed coronary CT angiography in swine: coronary enhancement with minimum volume of iodinated contrast material. AJR 2007; 188:1270; [web]W415-W422
18. Smith AC, Ehler W, Swindle MM. Anesthesia and analgesia in swine. In: Kohn DF, Wixson SK, White WJ, Benson GJ, eds. Anesthesia and analgesia in laboratory animals. New York, NY: Academic Press, 1997:313-366
19. Hittmair K, Fleischmann D. Accuracy of predicting and controlling time-dependent aortic enhancement from a test bolus injection. J Comp Asst Tomogr 2001; 25:287-294
20. Gerber TC, Stratmann BP, Kuzo RS, Kantor B, Morin RL. Effect of acquisition technique on radiation dose and image quality in multidetector row computed tomography coronary angiography with submillimeter collimation. Invest Radiol 2005; 40:556-563
21. Cohnen M, Poll L, Püttmann C, Ewen K, Mödder U. Radiation exposure in multi-slice CT of the heart. Rofo 2001; 173:295-299
22. Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease: report of the Ad-Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery. Circulation 1975; 51:5-40
23. Becker CR, Hong C, Knez A, et al. Optimal contrast application for cardiac 4-detector-row computed tomography. Invest Radiol 2003; 38:690-694
24. Becker CR, Knez A. Past, present and future perspective of cardiac computed tomography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004; 19:676-685
25. Fletcher SJ, Boldenham AR. Safe placement of central venous catheters: where should the tip of the catheter lie? Br J Anaesth 2000; 85:188-191
26. Ruesch S, Walder B, Tramer MR. Complications of central venous catheters: internal jugular versus subclavian access - a systematic review. Crit Care Med 2002; 30:454-460