Innovation Strategy And Business Performance Of Japanese Manufacturing Firms

Economics of Innovation and New Technology

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 27-52

  Motohashi, Kazuyuki ^a  

^a Economic Analysis and Statistics Division Directorate for ScienceTechnology and Industry OECD

Author keywords

Japanese manufacturing firms; Patents; Productivity; R D; Technology spillover

Indexed keywords

EID: 42449113376     PISSN: 10438599     EISSN: 14768364     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10438599800000027     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Baily, M., Hulten, C. and Campbell, D. (1992) ‘Productivity Dynamics in Manufacturing Plants', Brookings Papers: Microeconomics 1992
2. Bound, J., Cummins, C., Griliches, Z., Hall, B.H., and Jaffe, A., 1984. “ ‘Who Does R&D and Who Patents ”. In R&D, Patents and Productivity, Edited by: Griliches, Z., The University of Chicago Press.
3. Christensen, L.R., Cummings, D., and Jorgenson, D.W., 1981. Relative Productivity Levels, 1947–1973: An International Comparison. European Economic Review, 16 MAY
4. Cohen, W., 1996. “ Empirical Studies of Innovative Activity ”. In Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and TechnologicalChange, Blackwel Publishers Inc Edited by: Stoneman, P.
5. Levin, R.C., and Mowery, D.C., 1987. ‘Firm Size and R&D Intensity: A Reexamination. Journal of Industrial Economics, 35: 543–563.
6. Cuneo, P., and Mairesse, J., 1984. “ Productivity and R&D at the Firm Level in French Manufacturing ”. In R&D, Patents and Productivity, Edited by: Griliches, Z., The University of Chicago Press.
7. Doms, M., Jensen, J., Francis, K., Motohashi, K., and Nocke, V., ‘A MicroEconomic Comparison of the Manufacturing Sectors in France, Japan and the United States. a paper presemted for the NBER Summer Institute, Productivity Workshop. Cambridge, US
8. Fisher, F.M., and Temin, P., 1973. Return to Scale in Research and Development: What Does Schumpetarian Hypothesis Imply?. Journal of Political Economy, 81 (1): 56–70.
9. Fisher, F.M, and Temin, P., 1979. ‘The Schumpetarian Hypothesis: Reply. Journal of Political Economy, 87 (2): 386–389.
10. Griliches, Z., 1990. Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28: 1661–1707.
11. Mairesse, J., 1990. “ ‘R&D and Productivity Growth: comparing Japanese and US Manufacturing Firms ”. In Productivity Growth in Japan and the United States, Edited by: Hulten, C., 318–348. University of Chicago Press.
12. Mairesse, J., 1984. “ ‘Productivity and R&D at the Firm Level ”. In R&D, Patents and Productivity, Edited by: Griliches, Z., The University of Chicago Press.
13. 1989. ‘R&D Capital, Rate of Return on R&D Investment and Spillover of R&D in Japanese Manufacturing Industries. The Review ofEconomics and Statistics, 71 (4)
14. Jaffe, A., 1988. Demand and Supply Influences in R&D Intensity and Productivity Growth. Review of Economics and Statistics, 70 no
15. 1994. ‘Chiteki Saisan no Keizaikoka ni kansuru Hokokusho.
16. Kleinknecht, A., 1987. Measuring R&D in Small Firms: How Much are We Missing?. Journal of Industrial Economics, 36 December 1987
17. Levin, R.C., 1988. Appropriability, R&D Spending, and Technological Performance. American Economic Review, 78 (2)
18. Klevorick, A., Nelson, R., and Winter, S., 1987. Appropriating the Return from Industrial Research and Development. Brookings Papers on Economic Activities, 3 1987
19. 1994. Kigyokatsudo Kihonchosa Hokokusho. 1–3 MITI
20. Motohashi. ‘R&D, Spillover and Productivity: Survey of Economic Studies for Japanese Manufacturers. a paper presented for the Expert Workshop on Technology. Productivity and Employment: Macroeconomic and Sectoral Evidence. Paris: Japanese.
21. Odagiri, H., 1983. R&D Expenditure, Royalty Payments, and Sales Growth in Japanese Manufacturing Corporations. Journal of Industrial Economics, September 1983
22. 1986. The Impact of R&D on Productivity Increase in Japanese Manufacturing Companies. Research Policy, 15: 13–19.
23. 1992. ‘Private and Quasi-Social Rate of Return on Pharmaceutical R&D in Japan. Research Policy, August 1992
24. Pakes, A., and Griliches, Z., 1984. “ Patents and R&D at the Firm Level: A First look ”. In R&D, Patents and Productivity, Edited by: Griliches, Z., The University of Chicago Press.
25. Pavitt, K., Robson, M., and and Townsend, J., 1987. The Size Distribution of Innovating Firms in the U.K.: 1945–1983. Journal of Industrial Economics, 35 March 1987
26. Sassenou, M. (1988) ‘Recherche-development et productivite dans les enterprises japonaises: une etude econometrique sur donnes de panel’, Doctoral dissertation, Ecoles des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, Paris
27. Scherer, F.M., 1984. “ Corporate Size, Diversification, and Innovative Activity ”. In Innovation and Growth, The MIT Press.
28. Scherer, F.M., 1982a. ‘Inter industry Technology Flows and Productivity Growth. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 64 (11)
29. Schere, F.M., 1982b. ‘Inter industry Technology Flows in the United States. Research Policy, 11 August 1982
30. Takenaka. 1986. Kenkyu-kaihatsu to Setsubitoshi no Keizaigaku, Vol. 5, Japanese.
31. White, H., 1980. A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator And A Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48 (4)