Postoperative evaluation of the total ankle arthroplasty

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 190, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 1112-1123

  Bestic, Joseph M ^a   Peterson, Jeffrey J ^a   DeOrio, James K ^a,b   Bancroft, Laura W ^a   Berquist, Thomas H ^a   Kransdorf, Mark J ^a,c  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c ARMED FORCES INSTITUTE OF PATHOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Ankle; Ankle arthroplasty devices; Arthroplasty; Musculoskeletal imaging

Indexed keywords

ANKLE RADIOGRAPHY; ARTHROPLASTY; BIOMECHANICS; BLOOD VESSEL INJURY; BRAIN INJURY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; INFECTION; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; REVIEW; STRESS FRACTURE; SWELLING; TENDON LESION; WOUND HEALING IMPAIRMENT; X RAY ANALYSIS; ANKLE; JOINT PROSTHESIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROSTHESIS; RADIOGRAPHY;

ANKLE JOINT; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT; HUMANS; JOINT PROSTHESIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 42449105200     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.07.2729     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. Sodha S, Wei SY, Okereke E. Evolution of total ankle arthroplasty. Univ Pennsylvania Orthop J 2000; 13:18-21
2. Easley ME, Vertullo CJ, Urban WC, Nunley JA. Total ankle arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2002; 10:157-167
3. Spirt AA, Assal M, Hansen ST. Complications and failure after total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86:1172-1178
4. Jackson MP, Singh D. Total ankle replacement. Current Orthopaedics 2003; 17:292-298
5. Conti SF, Wong YS. Complications of total ankle replacement. Clin Orthop 2001; 391:105-114
6. DeOrio JK. Focus on total ankle arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2006; 29:978-980
7. DeOrio JK, Easley ME. Total ankle arthroplasty. In: Instructional course lectures. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 2008 (in press)
8. Berquist TH, DeOrio JK. Reconstructive procedures. In: Berquist TH, ed. Radiology of the foot and ankle, 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000:479-485
9. Knecht SI, Estin M, Callaghan JJ, et al. The Agility total ankle arthroplasty: seven to sixteen-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86:1161-1171
10. Anderson T, Montgomery F, Carlsson A. Uncemented STAR total ankle prostheses: three to eight-year follow-up of fifty-one consecutive ankles. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85:1321-1329
11. Valderrabano V, Hintermann B, Dick W. Scandinavian total ankle replacement. Clin Orthop 2004; 424:47-56
12. Pyevich MT, Saltzman CL, Callaghan JJ, Alvine FG. Total ankle arthroplasty: a unique design - two to twelve-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998; 80:1410-1420
13. Kopp FJ, Patel MM, Deland JT, O'Malley MJ. Total ankle arthroplasty with the Agility prosthesis: clinical and radiographic evaluation. Foot Ankle Int 2006; 27:97-103
14. Hanna RS, Haddad SL, Lazarus ML. Evaluation of periprosthetic lucency after total ankle arthroplasty: helical CT versus conventional radiography. Foot Ankle Int 2007; 28:921-926
15. Lee MJ, Kim S, Lee SA, et al. Overcoming artifacts from metallic orthopedic implants at highfield-strength MR imaging and multidetector CT. RadioGraphics 2007; 27:791-803
16. Buechel FF, Buechel FF, Pappas MJ. Ten-year evaluation of cementless Buechel-Pappas meniscal bearing total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Int 2003; 24:462-472