Arteriovenous shunt visualization in arteriovenous malformations with arterial spin-labeling MR imaging

American Journal of Neuroradiology

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 681-687

  Wolf, Ronald L ^a   Wang, J ^a   Detre, J A ^a   Zager, E L ^a   Hurst, R W ^a  

^a HOSPITAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTERIOVENOUS MALFORMATION; ARTERIOVENOUS SHUNT; ARTICLE; BRAIN BLOOD FLOW; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; GRAY MATTER; HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PERFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; SPIN LABELING;

ADULT; AGED; EMBOLIZATION, THERAPEUTIC; HUMANS; INTRACRANIAL ARTERIOVENOUS MALFORMATIONS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; SPIN LABELS;

EID: 42449105196     PISSN: 01956108     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A0901     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. th ed. Lakeland, FL: Greenberg Graphics; 1997:871
2. Crawford PM, West CR, Chadwick DW, et al. Arteriovenous malformations of the brain: natural history in unoperated patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1986;49:1-10
3. Ondra SL, Troupp H, George ED, et al. The natural history of symptomatic arteriovenous malformations of the brain: a 24-year follow-up assessment. J Neurosurg 1990;73:387-91
4. Carroll TJ, Grist TM. Technical developments in MR angiography. Radiol Clin North Am 2002;40:921-51
5. Langer DJ, Song JK, Niimi Y, et al. Transarterial embolization of vein of Galen malformations: the use of magnetic resonance imaging noninvasive optimal vessel analysis to quantify shunt reduction - report of two cases. J Neurosurg 2006;104:41-45
6. Wasserman BA, Lin W, Tarr RW, et al. Cerebral arteriovenous malformations: flow quantitation by means of two-dimensional cardiac-gated phase-contrast MR imaging. Radiology 1995;194:681-86
7. Korosec FR, Frayne R, Grist TM, et al. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:345-51
8. Mistretta CA, Grist TM, Korosec FR, et al. 3D time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR DSA: advantages and tradeoffs. Magn Reson Med 1998;40:571-81
9. Nael K, Michaely HJ, Villablanca P, et al. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the head and neck at 3.0 Tesla: initial results. Invest Radiol 2006;41:116-24
10. Peters DC, Korosec FR, Grist TM, et al. Undersampled projection reconstruction applied to MR angiography. Magn Reson Med 2000;43:91-101
11. Summers PE, Kollias SS, Valavanis A. Resolution improvement in thick-slab magnetic resonance digital subtraction angiography using SENSE at 3T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;20:662-73
12. Tsuchiya K, Aoki C, Fujikawa A, et al. Three-dimensional MR digital subtraction angiography using parallel imaging and keyhole data sampling in cerebrovascular diseases: initial experience. Eur Radiol 2004;14:1494-97
13. Buxton RB. Quantifying CBF with arterial spin labeling. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;22:723-26
14. Chalela JA, Alsop DC, Gonzalez-Atavales JB, et al. Magnetic resonance perfusion imaging in acute ischemic stroke using continuous arterial spin labeling. Stroke 2000;31:680-87
15. Parkes LM, Tofts PS. Improved accuracy of human cerebral blood perfusion measurements using arterial spin labeling: accounting for capillary water permeability. Magn Reson Med 2002;48:27-41
16. St Lawrence KS, Frank JA, McLaughlin AC. Effect of restricted water exchange on cerebral blood flow values calculated with arterial spin tagging: a theoretical investigation. Magn Reson Med 2000;44:440-49
17. rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2002:215-38.
18. Wong EC. Quantifying CBF with pulsed ASL: technical and pulse sequence factors. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;22:727-31
19. Dixon WT, Du LN, Faul DD, et al. Projection angiograms of blood labeled by adiabatic fast passage. Magn Reson Med 1986;3:454-62
20. Nishimura DG, Macovski A, Pauly JM. Considerations of magnetic resonance angiography by selective inversion recovery. Magn Reson Med 1988;7:472-84
21. Nishimura DG, Macovski A, Pauly JM, et al. MR angiography by selective inversion recovery. Magn Reson Med 1987;4:193-202
22. Essig M, Engenhart R, Knopp MV, et al. Cerebral arteriovenous malformations: improved nidus demarcation by means of dynamic tagging MR-angiography. Magn Reson Imaging 1996;14:227-33
23. Lu H, Clingman C, Golay X, et al. Determining the longitudinal relaxation time (T1) of blood at 3.0 Tesla. Magn Reson Med 2004;52:679-82
24. Alsop D, Detre J. Multisection cerebral blood flow MR imaging with continuous arterial spin labeling. Radiology 1998;208:410-16
25. Wang J, Zhang Y, Wolf RL, et al. Amplitude-modulated continuous arterial spin-labeling 3.0-T perfusion MR imaging with a single coil: feasibility study. Radiology 2005;235:218-28
26. Wolf RL, Wang J, Wang S, et al. Grading of CNS neoplasms using continuous arterial spin labeled perfusion MR imaging at 3 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;22:475-82
27. Hendrikse J, van Osch MJ, Rutgers DR, et al. Internal carotid artery occlusion assessed at pulsed arterial spin-labeling perfusion MR imaging at multiple delay times. Radiology 2004;233:899-904
28. Ducreux D, Buvat I, Meder JF, et al. Perfusion-weighted MR imaging studies in brain hypervascular diseases: comparison of arterial input function extractions for perfusion measurement. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:1059-69
29. Guo WY, Wu YT, Wu HM, et al. Toward normal perfusion after radiosurgery: perfusion MR imaging with independent component analysis of brain arteriovenous malformations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:1636-44
30. Floyd TF, Ratcliffe SJ, Wang J, et al. Precision of the CASL-perfusion MRI technique for the measurement of cerebral blood flow in whole brain and vascular territories. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003;18:649-55
31. Parkes LM, Rashid W, Chard DT, et al. Normal cerebral perfusion measurements using arterial spin labeling: reproducibility, stability, and age and gender effects. Magn Reson Med 2004;51:736-43
32. Ye FQ, Berman KF, Ellmore T, et al. H(2)(15)O PET validation of steady-state arterial spin tagging cerebral blood flow measurements in humans. Magn Reson Med 2000;44:450-56