Relating the ecological and legal frameworks for nature conservation in Europe

Journal of International Wildlife Law and Policy

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 63-95

  de Nooij, Reinier J W ^a   Leuven, Rob S E W ^a   Lenders, H J Rob ^a   Lam, Tycho E P A ^a,b   Pieters, Steven ^c  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b Hekkelman Lawyers and Notaries   (Netherlands)

^c Netherlands Commission for Environmental Assessment   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; DECISION MAKING; ECOLOGICAL APPROACH; LEGISLATION; NATURE CONSERVATION;

EURASIA; EUROPE;

EID: 42449083191     PISSN: 13880292     EISSN: 15481476     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13880290801960753     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. V.H. HEYWOOD & R.T. WATSON, GLOBAL BIODIVERSITY ASSESSMENT (1995).
2. R.J.W. DE NOOIJ, INTEGRATING ECOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE WITH LEGAL INSTRUMENTS FOR NATURE CONSERVATION IN RIVER MANAGEMENT (2006).
3. Id. at 5.
4. DUTCH HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE STATES GENERAL, KAMERSTUKKEN II 1995-1996, 23 147 NO. 7 (1996).
5. DUTCH HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE STATES GENERAL, KAMERSTUKKEN II 1992-1993, 23 147 No. 3. (1993).
6. DUTCH ADMINISTRATIVE JURISDICTION DEPARTMENT OF THE COUNCIL OF STATE, 26 JANUARY 2005.
7. COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, 7 SEPTEMBER 2004.
8. EUROPEAN COMMISSION, ASSESSMENT OF PLANS SIGNIFICANTLY AFFECTING NATURA 2000 SITES. METHODOLOGICAL GUIDANCE ON THE PROVISIONS OF ART. 6(3) AND (4) OF THE HABITATS DIRECTIVE 92/43/EEC (2002).
9. IUCN, RED LIST OF THREATENED ANIMALS (1993)
10. IUCN SPECIES SURVIVAL COMMISSION, RED LIST CATEGORIES (1994).
11. Id at 11.
12. DUTCH MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, NATURE AND FOOD QUALITY, BUITEN AAN HET WERK?HOUD TIJDIG REKENING MET BESCHERMDE DIEREN EN PLANTEN! (2005).
13. DUTCH HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE STATES GENERAL, KAMERSTUKKEN II 2003-2004, 29 446 NO. 13 (2004).
14. Id. at 8.
15. Id. at 15.
16. UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAM, THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY (1992).
17. R.F. Noss, Indicators for Monitoring Biodiversity, CONS. BIOL. 4, 355 (1990).
18. R.L. SMITH, ELEMENTS OF ECOLOGY (1992).
19. K.R.Benson, The Emergence of Ecology from Natural History, ENDEAVOUR 24, 59 (2000).
20. E.P. Odum, The Strategy of Ecosystem Development, SCIENCE 164, 262 (1969).
21. R.H.J. Lenders, Ecologists' Visions of Nature and their Consequences for Nature Valuation and Conservation, VISIONS OF NATURE. A SCIENTIFIC EXPLORATION OF PEOPLE'S IMPLICIT PHILOSOPHIES REGARDING NATURE IN GERMANY, THE NETHERLANDS AND THE UNITED KINGDOM, 191-210 (R.J.G. van den Born, R.H.J. Lenders, & W.T. de Groot, eds., 2006).
22. S.L. PIMM, THE BALANCE OF NATURE? ECOLOGICAL ISSUES IN THE CONSERVATION OF SPECIES AND COMMUNITIES (1991).
23. J.A. Wiens, Ecological Flows Across Landscape Boundaries: A Conceptual Overview, in LANDSCAPE BOUNDARIES: CONSEQUENCES FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY AND ECOLOGICAL FLOWS, 217-235 (A.J. Hansen & F. di Castri eds., 1999).
24. M. Sagoff, The Plaza and the Pendulum: Two Concepts of Ecological Science. BIOL. & PHILOSOPHY 18, 529 (2003).
25. Y. Haila, Scaling Environmental Issues: Problems and Paradoxes, LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING 61, 59 (2002).
26. M. Scheffer, S. Carpenter, J.A. Foley, C. Folke, & B. Walker, 2001. Catastrophic Shifts in Ecosystems. NATURE 413, 591 (2001).
27. cf. A.M.J. RAGAS, UNCERTAINTY IN ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY STANDARDS (2000).
28. D. Geneletti, E. Beinat, C.F. Chung, A.G. Chung, & H.J. Scholten, Accounting for Uncertainty Factors in Biodiversity Impact Assessment: Lessons from a Case Study, ENVIRONM. IMP. ASSESSM. REV. 23, 471 (2003).
29. cf. D. Simberloff, Flagships, Umbrellas, and Keystones: Is Single-Species Management Passé in the Landscape Era?, BIOL. CONSERV. 83: 247 (1998).
30. R.J.W. De Nooij,W.C.E.P. Verberk, H.J.R. Lenders, R.S.E.W. Leuven, & P.H. Nienhuis, The Importance of Hydrodynamics for Protected and Endangered Biodiversity of Lowland Rivers, HYDROBIOL. 565, 153 (2006).
31. R.S.E.W. Leuven, S. Wijnhoven, L. Kooistra, R.J.W. De Nooij, & M.A.J. Huijbregts, Toxicological Constraints for Rehabilitation of Riverine Habitats Along Lowland Rivers, ARCHIV FÜR HYDROBIOLOGIE SUPPLEMENT 155, LARGE RIVERS 15, 657 (2005).
32. D. Rabinowitz, S. Cairns, & T. Dillon, Seven Forms of Rarity and Their Frequency in the Flora of the British Isles, in CONSERVATION BIOLOGY: THE SCIENCE OF SCARCITY AND DIVERSITY (M.J. Soule ed., 1986).
33. Id. at 31.
34. M.J. Baptist, W.E. Penning, H. Duel, A.J.M. Smits, G.W. Geerling, G.E.M. van der Lee, & J.S.L. van Alphen, Assessment of Cyclic Floodplain Rejuvenation on Flood Levels and Biodiversity in the Rhine River, River RES. & APPLIC. 20, 285 (2004).
35. C.A. Johnston & R.J. Naiman, Browse Selection by Beaver: Effects on Riparian Forest Composition, CAN. J. FOREST RES. 20, 1036 (1990).
36. P. Collen & R.J. Gibson, 2000. THE GENERAL ECOLOGY OF BEAVERS (Castor spp.), AS RELATED TO THEIR INFLUENCE ON STREAM ECOSYSTEMS AND RIPARIAN HABITATS, AND THE SUBSEQUENT EFFECTS ON FISH-A REVIEW. REV. FISH BIOL. FISHERIES 10, 439 (2000).
37. T. Caro, J. Eadie, & A. Sih, Use of Substitute Species in Conservation Biology. CONSERV. BIOL. 19, 1821 (2005).
38. K. Ozaki, M. Isono, T. Kawahara, S. Iida, T. Kudo, & K. Fukuyama, A Mechanistic Approach to Evaluation of Umbrella Species as Conservation Surrogates. CONSERV. BIOL. 20, 1507 (2006).
39. R.K. MORGAN, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT. A METHODOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE (1998).
40. J. Verboom, R. Foppen, P. Chardon, P. Opdam, & P. Luttikhuizen, Introducing the Key Patch Approach for Habitat Networks with Persistent Populations: An Example for Marshland Birds. Biol. Conserv. 100, 89 (2001).
41. R.L SMITH, 1992. ELEMENTS OF ECOLOGY (1992).
42. T.R.E. Southwood, Habitat, the Template for Ecological Strategies? J. ANIM. ECOL. 46, 337 (1977).
43. Id. at 43.
44. Id. at 42.
45. EUROPEAN COMMISSION, MANAGEMENT OF NATURA 2000 SITES. THE PROVISIONS OF ART. 6 OF THE HABITATS DIRECTIVE 92/43/EEC ((2000).
46. Id. at 43.
47. M.A. Huston, A General Hypothesis of Species Diversity. AM. NATURAL. 113, 81 (1979).
48. Id. at 43.
49. R.S.E.W. Leuven, J.L.M. Haans, A.J. Hendriks, R.A.C. Lock, S.E. Wendelaar Bonga, Assessing Cumulative Impacts of Multiple Stressors on River Systems, in NEW CONCEPTS FOR SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT OF RIVER BASINS, 241-260. (P.H. Nienhuis, R.S.E.W. Leuven, & A.M.J. Ragas, eds., 1998).
50. Id. at 43.
51. R.B. PRIMACK, ESSENTIALS OF CONSERVATION BIOLOGY (1993).
52. Id. at 42.
53. cf. J.A,Wiens, Ecological Flows Across Landscape Boundaries: A Conceptual Overview, in LANDSCAPE BOUNDARIES: CONSEQUENCES FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY AND ECOLOGICAL FLOWS, 217-235 (A.J. Hansen & F. di Castri, eds., 1999).
54. R. Slootweg & A. Kolhoff, A Generic Approach to Integrate Biodiversity Considerations in Screening and Scoping for EIA. ENVIRONM. IMP. ASSESSM. REV. 23, 657 (2003).
55. European Environment Agency, The European environment-State and outlook 2005 (2005).
56. Id. at 42.
57. Id. at 5.
58. Dutch Administrative Jurisdiction Department of the Council of State, 18 January 1999
59. Dutch Courts of Justice Alkmaar, 4 June 2004.
60. Dutch Courts of Justice Alkmaar, 4 June 2004
61. Dutch Courts of Justice Haarlem, 21 April 2004.
62. Dutch Courts of Justice Leeuwarden, 23 January 2004.
63. Dutch Courts of Justice Alkmaar, 4 June 2004.
64. Dutch Administrative Jurisdiction Department of the Council of State, 16 July 2003.
65. Dutch Courts of Justice Alkmaar, 4 June 2004.
66. Dutch Administrative Jurisdiction Department of the Council of State, 5 September 2003.
67. EUROPEAN COMMISSION, ASSESSMENT OF PLANS SIGNIFICANTLY AFFECTING NATURA 2000 SITES. METHODOLOGICAL GUIDANCE ON THE PROVISIONS OF ART. 6(3) AND (4) OF THE HABITATS DIRECTIVE 92/43/EEC (2002).
68. Id. at 42.