Critical behavior of the random potts chain

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 60, Issue 18, 1999, Pages 12974-12981

  Carlon, E ^a   Chatelain, C ^a   Berche, B ^a  

^a INSTITUT JEAN LAMOUR   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4244218865     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.60.12974     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. A. B. Harris, J. Phys. C 7, 1671 (1974).
2. V. S. Dotsenko, Phys. Usp. 38, 457 (1995).
3. B. N. Shalaev, Phys. Rep. 237, 129 (1994).
4. W. Selke, L. N. Shchur, and A. L. Talapov, in Annual Reviews of Computational Physics, edited by D. Stauffer (World Scientific, Singapore, 1994), Vol. 1, p. 17.
5. Y. Imry and M. Wortis, Phys. Rev. B 19, 3580 (1979).
6. K. Hui and A. N. Berker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2507 (1989).
7. M. Aizenman and J. Wehr, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2503 (1989).
8. J. L. Cardy and J. L. Jacobsen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 4063 (1997).
9. J. L. Jacobsen and J. L. Cardy, Nucl. Phys. B 515, 701 (1998).
10. M. Picco, cond-mat/9802092 (unpublished).
11. C. Chatelain and B. Berche, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1670 (1998).
12. D. S. Fisher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 534 (1992).
13. A. P. Young and H. Rieger, Phys. Rev. B 53, 8486 (1996).
14. A. Juozapavic̆ius, S. Caprara, and A. Rosengren, Phys. Rev. B 56, 11 097 (1997).
15. H. Rieger and N. Kawashima, cond-mat/9802104 (unpublished).
16. T. Senthil and S. N. Majumdar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 3001 (1996).
17. B. M. McCoy and T. T. Wu, Phys. Rev. 176, 631 (1968);
18. Phys. Rev.B. M. McCoyT. T. Wu188, 982 (1969);
19. Phys. Rev.B. M. McCoy, 188, 1014 (1969).
20. J. B. Kogut, Rev. Mod. Phys. 51, 659 (1979).
21. S. R. White, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2863 (1992);
22. S. R. WhitePhys. Rev. B 48, 10 345 (1993).
23. Density Matrix Renormalization: A New Numerical Method in Physics, edited by I. Peschel, X. Wang, M. Kaulke, and K. Hallberg (Springer, Berlin, 1999).
24. T. Nishino, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 64, 3598 (1995).
25. S. Wiseman and E. Domany, Phys. Rev. E 51, 3074 (1995).
26. N. V. Prokof’ev and B. V. Svistunov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4355 (1998).
27. Similar remarks can be found in S. Rapsch, U. Schollwöck, and W. Zwerger, cond-mat/9901080 (unpublished).
28. A. Aharony and A. B. Harris, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3700 (1996).
29. S. Wiseman and E. Domany, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 22 (1998).
30. B. Derrida, Phys. Rep. 29, 103 (1984).
31. E. Carlon and F. Iglói, Phys. Rev. B 57, 7877 (1998).
32. We followed a different approach than in Ref. 14, where a bulk magnetic field was added to induce a finite magnetization.
33. M. Henkel and G. Schütz, J. Phys. A 21, 2617 (1988).
34. F. Iglói and E. Carlon, Phys. Rev. B 59, 3783 (1999).
35. F. Iglói and H. Rieger, Phys. Rev. B 57, 11 404 (1998).
36. C. Chatelain and B. Berche, Phys. Rev. E 58, R6899 (1998).
37. T. W. Burkhardt and T. Xue, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 895 (1991).
38. M. Henkel, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 3, 1011 (1992).
39. M. De Menech, A. L. Stella, and C. Tebaldi, Phys. Rev. E 58, R2677 (1998).
40. C. Tebaldi, M. De Menech, and A. L. Stella, cond-mat/9903270 (unpublished).
41. With another definition, namely, (Formula presented) one would expect in the case of self-averaging a unique exponent (Formula presented) for all values of (Formula presented) i.e., all the moments would scale like the average.