Microcavity effect of dyes adsorbed on a levitated droplet

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 60, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 2491-2496

  Yukawa, H ^a   Arnold, S ^b   Miyano, K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^b POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4244214219     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: 10941622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.60.2491     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. See, for example, Optical Effect Associated with Small Particles, edited by P. W. Barber and K. Chang (World Scientific, Singapore, 1988).
2. See, for example, Spontaneous Emission and Laser Oscillation in Microcavities, edited by H. Yokoyama and K. Ujihara (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1995), and references therein.
3. S. Arnold, J. Chem. Phys. 106, 8280 (1997).
4. See, for example, Optical Processes in Microcavities, edited by R. K. Chang and A. J. Campillo (World Scientific, Singapore, 1996).
5. J. Gersten and A. Nitzan, J. Chem. Phys. 75, 1139 (1981)
6. H. Chew, Phys. Rev. A 38, 3410 (1988)
7. S. C. Hill, H. I. Saleheen, M. D. Barnes, W. B. Whitten, and J. M. Ramsey, Appl. Opt. 35, 6278 (1996).
8. S. D. Druger, S. Arnold, and L. M. Folan, J. Chem. Phys. 87, 2649 (1987).
9. H. Kuhn, J. Chem. Phys. 53, 101 (1970).
10. H. Khosravi and R. Loudon, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 433, 337 (1991). In determining the reaction field on a molecule “on the surface” of a medium, the difference between inside and outside is extremely important;
11. for the discussion on the optical properties on the molecular scale, see, for example, H. Ui, A. Tomioka, T. Nishiwaki, and K. Miyano, J. Chem. Phys. 101, 6430 (1994).
12. S. Arnold, S. Holler, N. L. Goddard, and G. Griffel, Opt. Lett. 22, 1452 (1997).
13. S. Holler, N. Goddard, and S. Arnold, J. Chem. Phys. 108, 6545 (1998).
14. L. M. Folan and S. Arnold, Opt. Lett. 13, 1 (1988).
15. S. Arnold and L. M. Folan, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 58, 1732 (1987).
16. See, for a review, D. Möbius, in Langmuir-Blodgett Films, edited by G. Roberts (Plenum, New York, 1990).
17. K. H. Drexhage, in Dye Lasers, edited by F. P. Schäfer (Springer, Berlin, 1973).
18. S. Arnold and L. M. Folan, Opt. Lett. 14, 387 (1989).
19. For a mode with (Formula presented) (Formula presented) means that the intensity of the peak is reduced by a factor of (Formula presented). Although the real peak hight should be still comparable to a mode with (Formula presented), the area under the peak is reduced by the same factor. Therefore, detected with an instrument with a resolution much worse than the real width of the peak, it is smeared out and the peak is smaller by the same factor and hence is unobservable.
20. K. E. Drabe, G. Cnossen, and D. A. Wiersma, Chem. Phys. Lett. 169, 416 (1990).
21. M. D. Barnes, W. B. Whitten, S. Arnold, and J. M. Ramsey, J. Chem. Phys. 97, 7842 (1992).
22. H.-B. Lin, J. D. Eversole, C. D. Merritt, and A. J. Campillo, Phys. Rev. A 45, 6756 (1992).
23. At low temperature, the time scale of various events can be well separated so that the distinction is clear. See, for example, L. Fleury, A. Zumbusch, M. Orrit, R. Brown, and J. Bernard, J. Lumin. 56, 15 (1993).