Three-dimensional spin structure on a two-dimensional lattice: Mn/Cu(111)

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 86, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 1106-1109

  Kurz, Ph ^a   Bihlmayer, G ^a   Hirai, K ^a,b   Blugel, S ^a  

^a FORSCHUNGSZENTRUM JÜLICH   (Germany)

^b NARA MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIFERROMAGNETIC MATERIALS; ANTIFERROMAGNETISM; APPROXIMATION THEORY; CALCULATIONS; CHROMIUM; COPPER; CRYSTAL LATTICES; MAGNETIC MOMENTS; MANGANESE; MONOLAYERS; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION; SURFACES;

AB INITIO CALCULATIONS; GROUND STATE SPIN STRUCTURE; MAGNETIC GROUND STATE; MULTIPLE SPIN DENSITY WAVE;

GROUND STATE;

EID: 4244173482     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.1106     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. For a recent review, see J. Nogues and I. K. Schuller, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 192, 203 (1999).
2. For recent reviews, see H. Kawamura, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 10, 4707 (1998); M. F. Collins and O. A. Petrenko, Can. J. Phys. 75, 605 (1997).
3. For recent reviews, see H. Kawamura, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 10, 4707 (1998); M. F. Collins and O. A. Petrenko, Can. J. Phys. 75, 605 (1997).
4. R30° means a rotation of the surface supercell by 30° with respect to the elementary surface unit-cell.
5. S. Blügel, M. Weinert, and P. H. Dederichs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 1077 (1988); S. Blügel, D. Drittler, R. Zeller, and P. H. Dederichs, Appl. Phys. A 49, 547 (1989).
6. S. Blügel, M. Weinert, and P. H. Dederichs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 1077 (1988); S. Blügel, D. Drittler, R. Zeller, and P. H. Dederichs, Appl. Phys. A 49, 547 (1989).
7. A. S. Arrot, B. Heinrich, S. T. Purcell, J. F. Cochran, and K. B. Urquhart, J. Appl. Phys. 61, 3721 (1987).
8. W. L. O'Brien and B. P. Tonner, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 13, 1544 (1995).
9. T. Flores, M. Hansen, and M. Wuttig, Surf. Sci. 279, 251 (1992).
10. V. L. Moruzzi, J. F. Janak, and A. R. Williams, Calculated Electronic Properties of Metals (Pergamon, New York, 1978).
11. L. M. Sandratskii, Adv. Phys. 47, 91 (1998).
12. L. Nordström and D. J. Singh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4420 (1996).
13. P. H. Andersson, L. Nordström, and O. Eriksson, Phys. Rev. B 60, 6765 (1999).
14. E. Wimmer, H. Krakauer, M. Weinert, and A. J. Freeman, Phys. Rev. B 24, 864 (1981); M. Weinert, E. Wimmer, and A. J. Freeman, Phys. Rev. B 26, 4571 (1982).
15. E. Wimmer, H. Krakauer, M. Weinert, and A. J. Freeman, Phys. Rev. B 24, 864 (1981); M. Weinert, E. Wimmer, and A. J. Freeman, Phys. Rev. B 26, 4571 (1982).
16. U. von Barth and L. Hedin, J. Phys. C 5, 1629 (1972).
17. This is an excellent approximation for 3d metals.
18. P. H. Dederichs, S. Blügel, R. Zeller, and H. Akai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 2512 (1984).
19. G. M. Stocks et al., Philos. Mag. B 78, 665 (1998).
20. C. Herring, Magnetism IV, edited by G. Rado and H. Suhl (Academic Press, New York, 1966), Chaps. V and XIII.
21. Ph. Kurz, G. Bihlmayer, and S. Blügel (to be published).
22. K. Terakura, N. Hamada, T. Oguchi, and T. Asada, J. Phys. F 12, 1661 (1982).
23. This is strictly true only if M(α) = const. For Mn this condition is fulfilled to a very good approximation.
24. M. Takahashi, J. Phys. C 10, 1289 (1977).
25. ∥ state can be discarded based on an analogy of fcc antiferromagnets: T. Jo and K. Hirai, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 53, 3183 (1984).