Examining the cooling of hot nuclei

Physical Review C - Nuclear Physics

Volumn 57, Issue 2, 1998, Pages R462-R465

  Xi, H ^a   Huang, M J ^a   Lynch, W G ^a   Gaff, S J ^a   Gelbke, C K ^a   Glasmacher, T ^a   Kunde, G J ^a   Martin, L ^a   Montoya, C P ^a   Pratt, S ^a   Tsang, M B ^a   Friedman, W A ^b   Milazzo, P M ^c   Azzano, M ^c   Margagliotti, G V ^c   Rui, R ^c   Vannini, G ^c   Colonna, N ^d   Celano, L ^d   Tagliente, G ^d   D'Agostino M ^e,f   Bruno, M ^e,f   Fiandri, M L ^e,f   Gramegna, F ^g   Ferrero, A ^h   Iori, I ^h   Moroni, A ^h   Petruzzelli, F ^h   Mastinu, P F ^f   more..

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b University of Wisconsin ^*  (United States)

^c SEZIONE DI TRIESTE   (Italy)

^d INFN SEZIONE DI BARI   (Italy)

^e UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^f INFN SEZIONE DI BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^g LABORATORI NAZIONALI DI LEGNARO   (Italy)

^h INFN SEZIONE DI MILANO   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4244169678     PISSN: 05562813     EISSN: 1089490X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.57.R462     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. J. Randrup and S. E. Koonin, Nucl. Phys. A356, 223 (1981).
2. D. H. E. Gross, Phys. Rep. 279, 119 (1997).
3. J. Bondorf, Nucl. Phys. A433, 321 (1985).
4. W. A. Friedman and W. G. Lynch, Phys. Rev. C 28, 16 (1983).
5. W. A. Friedman, Phys. Rev. C 42, 667 (1990).
6. W. Hauser and H. Feshbach, Phys. Rev. 87, 366 (1952).
7. W. G. Lynch, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 37, 493 (1987), and references therein.
8. D. H. Boal, Rev. Mod. Phys. 62, 553 (1990).
9. D. R. Bowman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3534 (1993).
10. E. Bauge, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3705 (1993).
11. D. R. Bowman, Phys. Rev. C 52, 818 (1995).
12. D. Durand, Phys. Lett. B 345, 397 (1995).
13. K. G. R. Doss, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 3, 849 (1988).
14. G. Poggi, Nucl. Phys. A586, 755 (1995).
15. M. A. Lisa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 2662 (1995).
16. R. Bougault et al., LPCC 97-04.
17. S. C. Jeong, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 3468 (1994).
18. W. C. Hsi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 3367 (1994).
19. W. Reisdorf, Nucl. Phys. A612, 493 (1997).
20. C. Williams, Phys. Rev. C 55, R2132 (1997).
21. M. Colonna, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 30, 17 (1993).
22. I. Iori, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 325, 458 (1993)
23. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. AM. Bruno, 311, 189 (1992)
24. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. AN. Colonna, 321, 529 (1992)
25. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. AP. F. Mastinu, 338, 419 (1994).
26. R. T. de Souza, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 295, 109 (1990).
27. M. J. Huang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1648 (1997).
28. This value is slightly larger than the value (Formula presented)=0.175 (Formula presented) obtained in Ref. 11 for events with two observed fragments. The double ratio analysis is not very sensitive to the source velocity; changing the source velocity by 5% alters (Formula presented) by about 50 KeV.
29. S. Albergo, Nuovo Cimento A89, 1 (1985).
30. G. Kunde, Phys. Lett. B (in press).
31. The influence of secondary decay on the spectra has been qualitatively described by M. A. Bernstein, Phys. Rev. C 29, 132 (1984). Contributions due to the decays of even heavier fragments have been estimated via the feeding calculations of
32. Phys. Rev. CNayak, 45, 132 (1992), and have been found to be small (i.e., of the order of 5%).