|
Volumn 164, Issue 14, 2002, Pages 1927-1930
|
Can we rely on the results of urine microscopy and culture when tests are performed in general practice?;Kan man stole på urinmikroskopi og dyrkning, der er udført i almen praksis?
a a a |
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
BACTERIAL COUNT;
BACTERIAL STRAIN;
BACTERIUM DETECTION;
BACTERIURIA;
CONSULTATION;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DENMARK;
DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE;
DYSURIA;
ENTEROBACTER CLOACAE;
ENTEROCOCCUS FAECALIS;
ESCHERICHIA COLI;
GENERAL PRACTICE;
HOSPITAL LABORATORY;
HUMAN;
LABORATORY TEST;
MICROBIOLOGICAL EXAMINATION;
MICROSCOPY;
MORPHOLOGY;
PROTEUS MIRABILIS;
RELIABILITY;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
SKILL;
STANDARD;
STAPHYLOCOCCUS EPIDERMIDIS;
TASK PERFORMANCE;
URINALYSIS;
URINARY TRACT INFECTION;
URINE CULTURE;
VALIDATION PROCESS;
CLINICAL COMPETENCE;
METHODOLOGY;
MICROBIOLOGY;
PREDICTION AND FORECASTING;
REPRODUCIBILITY;
URINE;
BACTERIOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES;
BACTERIURIA;
CLINICAL COMPETENCE;
DENMARK;
FAMILY PRACTICE;
HUMANS;
PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS;
REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
URINARY TRACT INFECTIONS;
|
EID: 4244156672
PISSN: 00415782
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (7)
|
References (26)
|