Microtubules and vesicles under controlled tension

Physical Review E - Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and Related Interdisciplinary Topics

Volumn 55, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 850-859

  Kuchnir Fygenson, D ^a   Elbaum, M ^b   Shraiman, B ^c   Libchaber, A ^a,b  

^a ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NEC LABORATORIES AMERICA   (United States)

^c LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4244021671     PISSN: 1063651X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.55.850     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Phospholipids are amphiphilic molecules which spontaneously organize into bimolecular sheets. The hydrophobic alkyl chains of the molecules are sandwiched between two layers of hydrophilic phosphate head groups. The structure is impermeable to most molecules, with the notable exception of water [permeability coefficient (Formula presented) O∼5 μm3/μ(Formula presented) ts, T. E. Thompson and C. Huang, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 137, 740 (1966)].
2. A. D. Bangham and R. W. Horne, J. Mol. Biol. 8, 660 (1964).
3. R. B. Gennis, Biomembranes (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1989).
4. The membrane can exist in both a fluid and a gel-like state, but the latter is not found in living systems. A collection of studies on the physical properties of membranes is contained in Structure and Conformation of Amphiphilic Membranes, edited by R. Lipowsky, D. Richter, and K. Kremer (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1992).
5. J. F. Faucon, M. D. Mitov, P. Méléard, I. Bivas and P. Bothorel, J. Phys. (Paris) 50, 2389 (1989).
6. M. Kirschner and T. Mitchison, Cell 45, 329 (1986).
7. B. Winckler and F. Solomon, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 88, 6033 (1991).
8. F. Lafont, M. Rouget, A. Rousselet, C. Valenza and A. Prochiantz, J. Cell Sci. 104, 433 (1993).
9. R. Kwok and E. Evans, Biophys. J. 35, 637 (1981).
10. H. Hotani and H. Miyamoto, Adv. Biophys. 26, 135 (1990).
11. M. Elbaum, D. Kuchnir Fygenson and A. Libchaber, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4078 (1996).
12. R. C. Williams, Jr., and J. C. Lee, Meth. Enzym. 85, 376 (1982).
13. D. Kuchnir Fygenson, E. Braun and A. Libchaber, Phys. Rev. E 50, 1579 (1994).
14. D. Kuchnir Fygenson, H. Flyvbjerg, K. Sneppen, A. Libchaber and S. Leibler, Phys. Rev. E 51, 5058 (1995).
15. U. Pick, Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 212, 186 (1981).
16. Osmotic considerations are subtle here. Pipes is a diacid requiring 1.5 positive counterions to bring it to a pH of 6.8. Thus 100-mM Pipes at pH 6.8 has the same osmolarity as 250 mM of simple, nondissociating solute.
17. It is important to pump thoroughly on the mineral oil to draw out its lighter components which might contaminate the vesicles.
18. That the membrane is never punctured by the microtubules is apparent from (a) the fact that the tubulin-free environment outside the vesicles would force the microtubules to depolymerize and (b) straight microtubules buckle under increased membrane tension (see Secs. IIItB–IIItD).
19. Note that the microtubule radius (12.5 nm) is much smaller than the typical vesicle radius (5 μm).
20. D. Kuchnir Fygenson, M. Betterton, J. Marko, and A. Libchaber (unpublished).
21. Assuming the (spontaneously nucleated) microtubules are 14 dimers around, and given that a tubulin dimer is 4×8 nm, with its long axis aligned with the microtubule.
22. Mol. Biol. Cell 3, 1141 (1992);
23. J. Cell Biol. 107, 1437 (1988)].
24. This is not to imply that there were no other microtubules in the vesicle, but that only one of them was long enough to deform the vesicle forciably. This was clear from careful visualization, as the temperature decreased and the microtubules inside slowly disappeared.
25. Typical microtubule growth rates for 25-μM tubulin at 27t°C are ∼4 μm/min (see Ref. 14). Thus in 10 s the microtubule might increase by at most ∼0.5 μm, or ∼5%.
26. This condition is maintained by the high concentration of salts (buffer) inside the vesicle, which creates a large osmotic pressure in response to any change in volume.
27. W. Helfrich and R.-M. Servuss, Nuovo Cimento D 3, 137 (1984).
28. E. Evans and W. Rawicz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 2094 (1990).
29. L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Statistical Physics (Pergamon, Oxford, 1980), p. 396.
30. S. Yamazaki, T. Maeda, and T. Miki-Nomura, in Biological Functions of Microtubules and Related Structures, edited by H. Sakai, H. Mohri, and G. G. Borisy (Academic, New York, 1982), p. 41.
31. F. Gittes, B. Mickey, J. Nettleton and J. Howard, J. Cell Biol. 120, 923 (1993).
32. P. Venier, A. C. Maggs, M.-F. Carlier and D. Pantaloni, J. Biol. Chem. 269, 13353 (1994).
33. M. Kurachi, M. Hoshi and H. Tashiro, Cell Motil. Cytoskel. 30, 221 (1995).
34. B. Mickey and J. Howard, J. Cell Biol. 130, 909 (1995).
35. This concentration is 20% higher than the one in which the vesicles were frozen or thawed, due to osmotic crushing in the sample cell.
36. Since the microtubule length appeared stable, this concentration was taken to be at the transition for unbounded growth.
37. L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Theory of Elasticity (Pergamon, Oxford, 1980), p. 533.
38. E. Evans and D. Needham, J. Phys. Chem. 91, 4219 (1987).
39. K. M. Yamada, B. S. Spooner and N. K. Wessells, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 66, 1206 (1970).
40. S. Kamimura and K. Takahashi, Nature 293, 566 (1981).
41. J. B. Tucker, C. C. Paton, C. G. Henderson and M. M. Mogensen, Cell Motil. Cytoskel. 25, 49 (1993).
42. S. Kim, M. Magendantz, W. Katz and F. Solomon, J. Cell Biol. 104, 51 (1987).
43. J. R. Jacobs and J. K. Stevens, J. Cell Biol. 103, 907 (1986).
44. J. Knops, K. S. Kosik, G. Lee, J. D. Pardee, L. Cohen-Gould and L. McConlogue, J. Cell Biol. 114, 725 (1991).
45. G. W. Brodland and R. Gordon, J. Biomech. Eng. 112, 319 (1990).