The evolutionary relationships of rotifers and acanthocephalans

Hydrobiologia

Volumn 387-388, Issue , 1998, Pages 83-91

  Garey, James R ^a   Schmidt Rhaesa, Andreas ^a   Near, Thomas J ^b   Nadler, Steven A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

18S rRNA gene; Acanthocephala; Bilateria; Evolution; Phylogeny; Rotifera

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENETICS; RELATEDNESS;

ACANTHOCEPHALA; ROTIFERA;

EID: 4243967972     PISSN: 00188158     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/a:1017060902909     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (50)

1. Aguinaldo, A. M. A., J. M. Turbeville, L. S. Linford, M. C. Rivera, J. R. Garey, R. A. Raff & J. A. Lake, 1997. Evidence for a clade of nematodes, arthropods and other moulting animals. Nature 387: 489-493.
2. Ahlrichs, W., 1995. Zur Ultrastruktur und Phylogenie von Seison nebaliae Grube, 1859 und Seison annulatus Claus, 1876 - Hypothesen zu phylogenetischen Verwandtschaftsverhältnissen innerhalb der Bilateria. Cuvillier, Göttingen, 310 pp.
3. Ahlrichs, W., 1997. Epidermal ultrastructure of Seison nebaliae and Seison annulatus, and a comparison of epidermal structures within the Gnathifera. Zoomorphology 117: 41-48.
4. Ax, P., 1996. Multicellular Animals, a new approach to the phylogenetic order in nature, Vol. I. Springer, Berlin, 225 pp.
5. Brusca, R. C. & G. J. Brusca, 1990. Invertebrates. Sinauer, Sunderland, 922 pp.
6. Clement, P. & E. Wurdak, 1991. Rotifera. In F. W. Harrison & E. E. Ruppert (eds), Microscopic Anatomy of Invertebrates, Vol. 4. Wiley-Liss, Inc., New York: 219-297.
7. Clement, P., 1993. The phylogeny of rotifers: molecular, ultrastructural and behavioural data. Hydrobiologia 255/256: 527-544.
8. Davies, K. A. & J. M. Fisher, 1994. On hormonal control of moulting in Aphelenchus avenae (Nematoda: Aphelenchida). Int. J. Parasitol. 24: 649-655.
9. De Rijk, P. & R. De Wachter, 1993. DCSE, an interactive tool for sequence alignment and secondary struture research. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 9: 735-740.
10. Donoghue, M. J., R. G. Olmstead, F. F. Smith & J. D. Palmer, 1992. Phylogenetic relationships of Dipsacaleson RbcL sequences. Ann. MO Bot. Gard. 79: 333-345.
11. Dunagan, T. T. & D. M. Miller, 1991. Acanthocephala. In F. W. Harrison & E. E. Ruppert (eds), Microscopic Anatomy of Invertebrates, Vol. 4. Wiley-Liss, Inc., New York: 299-332.
12. Eernisse, D. J., J. S. Albert, & F. E. Anderson, 1992. Annelida and Arthropoda are not sister taxa: a phylogenetic analysis of spiralian metazoan morphology. Syst. Biol. 41: 305-330.
13. Ehlers, U., W Ahlrichs, C. Lemburg & A. Schmidt-Rhaesa, 1996. Phylogenetic systematization of the Nemathelminthes (Aschelminthes). Verh. Dtsch. Zool. Ges. 89.1: 8.
14. Felsenstein, J., 1988. Phylogenies from molecular sequences: inference and reliability. Annu. Rev. Genet. 22: 521-565.
15. Felsenstein, J., 1993. PHYLIP: phylogeny inference package, version 3.5, University of Washington, Seattle.
16. Felsenstein, J. & G. A. Churchill, 1996. A hidden Markov model approach to variation among sites in rate of evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13: 930-104.
17. Garey J. R., T. J. Near, M. R. Nonnemacher & S. A. Nadler, 1996a. Molecular evidence for Acanthocephala as a sub-taxon of Rotifera. J. Mol. Evol. 43: 287-292.
18. Garey, J. R., M. Krotec, D. R. Nelson & J. Brooks, 1996b. Molecular analysis supports a Tardigrade-Arthropod association. Invert. Biol. 115:79-88.
19. Gupta, A. P., 1990. Morphogenetic hormones and their glands in arthropods: evolutionary aspects. In: Gupta (ed.), Morphogenetic Hormones of Arthropods. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press: 1-34.
20. Haffner, K. von, 1950. Organisation und systematische Stellung der Acanthocephalen. Zool. Anz. 145: (suppl.) 243-274.
21. Halanych, K. M., J. D. Bacheller, A. A. Aguinaldo, S. M. Liva, D. M. Hillis & J. A. Lake, 1995. Evidence of 18S ribosomal DNA that the Lophophorates are Protostome Animals. Science, 267: 1641-1643.
22. Hillis, D. M., J. P. Huelsenbeck & C. W. Cunningham, 1994. Application and accuracy of molecular phylogenies. Science 264: 671-677.
23. Hillis, D. M. & M. T. Dixon, 1991. Ribosomal DNA: molecular evolution and phylogenetic inference. Quart. Rev. Biol. 66: 411-446.
24. Hillis, D. M. & J. J. Bull, 1993. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42: 182-192.
25. Hyman, L., 1951. The invertebrates: Acanthocephala, Aschelminthes, and Entoprocta. McGraw Hill, New York, 572 pp.
26. Kumar S, K. Tamura & M. Nei, 1994. MEGA: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis software for microcomputers. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 10: 189-191.
27. Li, W.-H., 1997. Molecular Evolution. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA, 487 pp.
28. Lorenzen, S., 1985. Phylogenetic aspects of pseudocoelomate evolution. In S. Conway-Morris, J. D. George, R. Gibson & H. M. Platt (eds), The Origin and Relationships of Lower Invertebrates. Claredon Press, Oxford: 210-2-23.
29. Mackey, L. Y., B. Winnepennickx, T. Backeljau, R. De Wachter, P. Emschermann & J. R. Garey, 1996. 18S rRNA suggests that Entoprocta are Protostomes, unrelated to Ectoprocta. J. Mol. Evol. 42: 552-559.
30. Malakhov, V. V., 1994. Nematodes. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, 286 pp.
31. Markevich, F. I., 1993. Phylogenetic relationships of Rotifera to other vermiform taxa. Hydrobiologia 255/256: 521-526.
32. Miller, D. M. & T. T. Dunagan, 1985. Functional morphology. In D. W T. Crompton & B. B. Nickol (eds), Biology of the Acanthocephala. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 73-123.
33. Near, T. J., J. R. Garey & S. A. Nadler, 1997. Phylogenetic relationships of the acanthocephala inferred from 18S ribosomal DNA sequences. Mol. Phyl. Evol., in press.
34. Nebelsick, M., 1993. Introvert, mouth cone, and nervous system of Echinoderes capitatus (Kinorhyncha, Cyclorhagida) and implications for the phylogenetic relationships of Kinorhyncha. Zoomorphology 113: 211-232.
35. Neuhaus, B., 1994. Ultrastructure of alimentary canal and body cavity, ground pattern, and phylogenetic relationships of the Kinorhyncha. Microfauna Marina 9: 61-156.
36. Nielsen, C., 1995. Animal evolution. Interrelationships of the living phyla. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 467 pp.
37. Nielsen, C., N. Scharff & D. Eibye-Jacobsen, 1996. Cladistic analysis of the animal kingdom. Biol. J. linn. Soc. 57: 385-410.
38. Pennak, R. W., 1989. Fresh-water invertebrates of the United States, Protozoa to Mollusca, 3rd Ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 628 pp.
39. Raff, R. A., C. R. Marshall & J. M. Turbeville, 1994. Using DNA sequences to unravel the Cambrian radiation of the animal phyla, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 25: 351-374.
40. Remane, A., 1963. The systematic position and phylogeny of the pseudocoelomates. In E. C. Dougherty (ed.), The Lower Metazoa. Univ. of Calif. Press, Berkeley: 247-255.
41. Ricci, C., G. Melone & C. Sotgia, 1993. Old and new data on Seisonidea (Rotifera). Hydrobiologia 255/256: 495-511.
42. Rieger, R. M. & S. Tyler, 1995. Sister-group relationship of Gnathostomulida and Rotifera-Acanthocephala. Invertebrate Biology 114: 186-188.
43. Ruppert, E. E. (1991) Introduction to the aschelminth phyla: a consideration of mesoderm, body cavities, and cuticle. In F. W. Harrison & E. E. Ruppert (eds), Microscopic Anatomy of Invertebrates, Vol. 4: Aschelminthes. Wiley-Liss, New York: 1-17.
44. Ruppert, E. E. & R. D. Barnes, 1994. Invertebrate Zoology, 6th Ed., Saunders College Publ., Fort Worth, 1056 pp.
45. Schram, F. R., 1991. Cladistic analysis of metazoan phyla and the placement of fossil problematica. In A. Simonetta & S. Conway Morris (eds), The Early Evolution of Metazoa and the Significance of Problematic Taxa. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 35-46.
46. Storch, V. & U. Welsch, 1969. Uber den Aufbau des Rotatorienintegumentes. Z. Zellforsch. 95: 405-414.
47. Telford, M. J. & P. W. H. Holland, 1993. The phylogenetic affinities of the chaetognaths: A molecular analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10: 660-676.
48. Wallace, R. L., C. Ricci & G. Melone, 1996. A cladistic analysis of pseudocoelomate (aschelminth) morphology. Invertebrate Biol. 115: 104-112.
49. Wallace, R. L. & R. A. Colburn, 1989. Phylogenetic relationships within phylum Rotifera: orders and genus Notholca. Hydrobiologia 186/187: 311-318.
50. Winnepenninckx, B., T. Backeljau, L. Y. Mackey, J. M. Brooks, R. De Wachter, S. Kumar & J. R. Garey, 1995. 18S rRNA data indicate that the aschelminthes are polyphyletic and consist of at least three distinct clades. Molec. Biol. Evol. 12: 1132-1137.