Wave number of maximal growth in viscous magnetic fluids of arbitrary depth

Physical Review E - Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and Related Interdisciplinary Topics

Volumn 61, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 5528-5539

  Lange, Adrian ^a   Reimann, Bert ^b   Richter, Reinhard ^b  

^a OTTO VON GUERICKE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BAYREUTH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL METHOD; CRITICAL MAGNETIC FIELD; FINITE DEPTH; LINEAR STABILITY THEORY; NORMAL-FIELD INSTABILITY; TRANSIENT PATTERNS; WAVE NUMBERS;

MAGNETIC FLUIDS;

EID: 4243888882     PISSN: 1063651X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.61.5528     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Magnetic Fluids and Application Handbook, edited by B. Berkovski and V. Bashtovoy (Begell House, New York, 1996).
2. M. D. Cowley and R. E. Rosensweig, J. Fluid Mech. 30, 671 (1967).
3. R. E. Rosensweig, Ferrohydrodynamics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1985).
4. A. Gailitis, J. Fluid Mech. 82, 401 (1977).
5. V. G. Bashtovoi, M. S. Krakov, and A. G. Recks, Magnetohydrodynamics 21, 19 (1985).
6. J.-C. Bacri and D. Salin, J. Phys. (France) 45, L559 (1984).
7. T. Mahr, Ph.D. thesis, University of Magdeburg, 1998 (unpublished).
8. We have found two references relating to constant wave numbers for a jumplike field increase. Since reference 5 in 9 is unpublished and reference 14 in 11 is an abstract, not enough details are provided to assess this result.
9. D. Salin, Europhys. Lett. 21, 667 (1993).There is a misprint in Eqs. (6) and (10).
10. Since (Formula presented) is generally a complex number, the absolute value of (Formula presented) should appear in the definition of the viscous depth, (Formula presented).
11. B. Abou, G. Néron de Surgy, and J. E. Wesfreid, J. Phys. II 7, 1159 (1997).
12. J. Weilepp and H. R. Brand, J. Phys. II 6, 419 (1996).The constants given in Eq. (17) are correct for the magnetic boundary value problem at (Formula presented) and 0 instead of the given boundaries in Eqs. (13) and (14). There is a misprint in Eq. (32).
13. H. W. Müller, Phys. Rev. E 58, 6199 (1998).
14. T. Mahr and I. Rehberg, Physica D 111, 335 (1998).
15. Measurements conducted by A. Rothert.
16. A. T. Skjeltorp, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 37, 253 (1983).
17. J.-C. Bacri, R. Perzynski, and D. Salin, C. R. Acad. Sci., Ser. II: Mec., Phys., Chim., Sci. Terre Univers 307, 699 (1988).
18. P. A. Petit, M. P. de Albuquerque, V. Cabuil, and P. Molho, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 113, 127 (1992).
19. J. Bechhoefer, V. Ego, S. Mannville, and B. Johnson, J. Fluid Mech. 288, 325 (1995).
20. Hydrodynamics and Nonlinear Instabilities, edited by C. Godrèche and P. Manneville (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1998), Chap. 4.
21. M. C. Cross and P. C. Hohenberg, Rev. Mod. Phys. 65, 851 (1993).
22. J. Browaeys, J.-C. Bacri, C. Flament, S. Neveu, and R. Perzynski, Eur. Phys. J. B 9, 335 (1999).
23. S. Douady, J. Fluid Mech. 221, 383 (1990).
24. W. S. Edwards and S. Fauve, J. Fluid Mech. 278, 123 (1994).
25. A. G. Boudouvis, J. L. Puchalla, L. E. Scriven, and R. E. Rosensweig, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 65, 307 (1987).
26. G. Néron de Surgy, J.-P. Chabrerie, and J. E. Wesfreid, IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2, 184 (1995).