Field-induced delocalization and zener breakdown in semiconductor superlattices

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 86, Issue 7, 2001, Pages 1307-1310

  Rosam, B ^a   Meinhold, D ^a   Loser F ^a   Lyssenko, V G ^a   Glutsch, S ^b   Bechstedt, F ^b   Rossi, F ^c   Kohler K ^d   Leo, K ^a  

^a DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

^c POLITECNICO DI TORINO   (Italy)

^d FRAUNHOFER INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED SOLID STATE PHYSICS IAF   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BLOCH OSCILLATIONS; BLOCH STATES; FIELD INDUCED DELOCALIZATION; LINEAR OPTICAL SPECTROSCOPY; TIME RESOLVED MEASUREMENTS; ZENER BREAKDOWN; ZENER TUNNELING;

BAND STRUCTURE; DAMPING; ELECTRIC FIELD EFFECTS; ELECTRODYNAMICS; ELECTRON TRANSITIONS; ELECTRON TUNNELING; FOUR WAVE MIXING; HETEROJUNCTIONS; OSCILLATIONS; POLARIZATION; SPECTROSCOPY; SPECTRUM ANALYSIS;

SEMICONDUCTOR SUPERLATTICES;

EID: 4243844286     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.1307     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. C. Zener, Proc. R. Soc. London 145, 523 (1934).
2. F. Bloch, Z. Phys. 52, 555 (1928).
3. G. H. Wannier, Phys. Rev. 117, 432 (1960).
4. K. Hacker and G. Obermair, Z. Phys. 234, 1 (1970).
5. M. Luban and J. H. Luscombe, Phys. Rev. B 35, 9045 (1987).
6. J. Bleuse, G. Bastard, and P. Voisin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 220 (1988).
7. E. O. Kane, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 12, 181 (1959).
8. J. Callaway, Quantum Physics of the Solid State (Academic Press, New York and London, 1974), Pt. B, p. 465ff.
9. J. Zak, Phys. Rev. Lett. 20, 1477 (1968).
10. J. E. Avron et al., J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 18, 918 (1977).
11. A. Nenciu and G. Nenciu, J. Phys. A 15, 3313 (1982).
12. L. Esaki and R. Tsu, IBM J. Res. Dev. 61, 61 (1970).
13. A. Sibille et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 52 (1990).
14. E. E. Mendez, F. Agullo-Rueda, and J. M. Hong, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 2426 (1988); P. Voisin et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 1639 (1988).
15. E. E. Mendez, F. Agullo-Rueda, and J. M. Hong, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 2426 (1988); P. Voisin et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 1639 (1988).
16. J. Feldmann et al., Phys. Rev. B 46, 7252 (1992); K. Leo et al., Solid State Commun. 84, 943 (1992).
17. J. Feldmann et al., Phys. Rev. B 46, 7252 (1992); K. Leo et al., Solid State Commun. 84, 943 (1992).
18. C. Waschke et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3319 (1993).
19. V. G. Lyssenko et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 301 (1997).
20. M. Ben Dahan et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4508 (1996).
21. S. R. Wilkinson et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4512 (1996).
22. H. Schneider et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 2720 (1990).
23. M. Nakayama et al., Phys. Rev. B 44, 5935 (1991).
24. G. Bastard et al., Phys. Rev. B 50, 4445 (1994).
25. J. Leo and A. MacKinnon, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 1, 1449 (1989).
26. A. Sibille, J. F. Palmier, and F. Laruelle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4506 (1998).
27. M. Helm et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3120 (1999).
28. K. W. Goossen, J. E. Cunningham, and W. Y. Yan, Appl. Phys. Lett. 57, 2582 (1990).
29. G. von Plessen, J. Feldmann, and E. O. Göbel, Appl. Phys. Lett. 63, 2372 (1993).
30. Deep SL are unsuitable for these investigations because resonant interminiband tunneling of below barrier minibands strongly masks the coupling to above-barrier states.
31. S. Glutsch and F. Bechstedt, Phys. Rev. B 60, 16 584 (2000).
32. S. Glutsch and F. Bechstedt, Phys. Rev. B 57, 11 887 (1998).
33. Since we study the wave function delocalization in a super-lattice, we cannot observe the catastrophic electrical Zener breakdown seen in a bulk sample: there, the transfer of a large number of carriers from the filled valence band leads to an increase of the number of mobile carriers by many orders of magnitude, whereas in a SL, only the comparatively small number of photoexcited carriers is transferred to higher minibands. In the current-voltage curves of our sample, we thus cannot observe a significant effect.
34. 0 transition.
35. Linear spectra of sample B are almost identical to sample A; the main difference being a weaker coupling to the continuum in sample B due to somewhat higher barriers.
36. Because of the progressing WSL localization an excitation of a Bloch oscillating wave packet is not possible for higher fields.
37. F. Rossi, topical review on Coherent phenomena in semiconductors, Semicond. Sci. Technol. 13, 147 (1998);
38. F. Rossi, in Theory of Transport Properties of Semiconductor Nanostructures, edited by E. Schöll (Chapman & Hall, London. 1998), p. 283.