Electron correlation effects on the calculated 13C NMR spectra of vinyl cations

Journal of Molecular Structure: THEOCHEM

Volumn 398-399, Issue , 1997, Pages 73-80

  Gauss, Jürgen ^a,b   Stanton, John F ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KARLSRUHE   (Germany)

^b JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Coupled cluster methods; Electron correlation; NMR chemical shift calculations; Vinyl cations

Indexed keywords

EID: 4243832525     PISSN: 01661280     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0166-1280(96)04926-3     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. For reviews, see P.J. Stang, Z. Rappoport, M. Hanack, and L.R. Subramanian, Vinyl Cations, Academic Press, New York, 1979; M. Hanack and L.R. Subramanian, in M. Hanack, Houben-Weyl Methoden der Organischen Chemie, Vol. E19c, Thieme, Stuttgart, 1990, p. 97; H.-U. Siehl, in G.K.S. Prakash and P. von R. Schleyer (Eds.), Stable Carbocation Chemistry, Wiley, New York, 1996, ch. 5, p. 165.
2. For reviews, see P.J. Stang, Z. Rappoport, M. Hanack, and L.R. Subramanian, Vinyl Cations, Academic Press, New York, 1979; M. Hanack and L.R. Subramanian, in M. Hanack, Houben-Weyl Methoden der Organischen Chemie, Vol. E19c, Thieme, Stuttgart, 1990, p. 97; H.-U. Siehl, in G.K.S. Prakash and P. von R. Schleyer (Eds.), Stable Carbocation Chemistry, Wiley, New York, 1996, ch. 5, p. 165.
3. For reviews, see P.J. Stang, Z. Rappoport, M. Hanack, and L.R. Subramanian, Vinyl Cations, Academic Press, New York, 1979; M. Hanack and L.R. Subramanian, in M. Hanack, Houben-Weyl Methoden der Organischen Chemie, Vol. E19c, Thieme, Stuttgart, 1990, p. 97; H.-U. Siehl, in G.K.S. Prakash and P. von R. Schleyer (Eds.), Stable Carbocation Chemistry, Wiley, New York, 1996, ch. 5, p. 165.
4. E.P. Kanter, Z. Vager, G. Both and D. Zajfman, J. Chem. Phys., 85 (1986) 7487.
5. M.W. Crofton, M.-F. Jagod, B.D. Rehfuss and T. Oka, J. Chem. Phys., 91 (1989) 5139.
6. R. Lindh, J.E. Rice and T.J. Lee, J. Chem. Phys., 94 (1991) 8008, and references therein.
7. H.-U. Siehl and H. Mayr, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 104 (1982) 909.
8. H.-U. Siehl and E.W. Koch, J. Org. Chem., 49 (1984) 575.
9. H.-U. Siehl, J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun., (1984) 635.
10. H.-U. Siehl, F.-P. Kaufmann, Y. Apeloig, V. Braude, D. Danovich, A. Berndt and N. Stamatis, Angew. Chem., 103 (1991) 1546.
11. G.K.S. Prakash, V.P. Reddy, G. Rasul, J. Casanova and G.A. Olah, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 114 (1992) 3076.
12. F.-P. Kaufmann and H.-U. Siehl J. Am. Chem. Soc., 114 (1992) 4937.
13. H.-U. Siehl, F.-P. Kaufmann and K. Hori, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 114 (1992) 9343.
14. H.-U. Siehl, T. Müller, J. Gauss, P. Buzek and P. von R. Schleyer, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 116 (1994) 6384.
15. H.-U. Siehl, T. Müller and J. Gauss, Angew. Chem., to be submitted.
16. See, for example, W. Kutzelnigg, U. Fleischer and M. Schindler, in P. Diehl, E. Fluck, H. Günther, R. Kosfeld and J. Seelig (Eds.), NMR: Basic Principles and Progress, Vol. 23, Springer, Berlin 1990, p. 165; P. Buzek, P. von R. Schleyer and S. Sieber, Chemie in unserer Zeit, 26 (1992) 116; J. Gauss, Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem., 99 (1995) 1001.
17. See, for example, W. Kutzelnigg, U. Fleischer and M. Schindler, in P. Diehl, E. Fluck, H. Günther, R. Kosfeld and J. Seelig (Eds.), NMR: Basic Principles and Progress, Vol. 23, Springer, Berlin 1990, p. 165; P. Buzek, P. von R. Schleyer and S. Sieber, Chemie in unserer Zeit, 26 (1992) 116; J. Gauss, Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem., 99 (1995) 1001.
18. See, for example, W. Kutzelnigg, U. Fleischer and M. Schindler, in P. Diehl, E. Fluck, H. Günther, R. Kosfeld and J. Seelig (Eds.), NMR: Basic Principles and Progress, Vol. 23, Springer, Berlin 1990, p. 165; P. Buzek, P. von R. Schleyer and S. Sieber, Chemie in unserer Zeit, 26 (1992) 116; J. Gauss, Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem., 99 (1995) 1001.
19. J. Gauss, Chem. Phys. Letters, 191 (1992) 614; J. Gauss, J. Chem. Phys., 99 (1993) 3629.
20. J. Gauss, Chem. Phys. Letters, 191 (1992) 614; J. Gauss, J. Chem. Phys., 99 (1993) 3629.
21. See, for example, J. Gauss and D. Cremer, Adv. Quant. Chem., 23 (1992) 205.
22. J. Gauss, Chem. Phys. Lett., 229 (1994) 198.
23. J. Gauss and J.F. Stanton, J. Chem. Phys., 102 (1995) 251; J. Gauss and J.F. Stanton, J. Chem. Phys., 103 (1995) 3562.
24. J. Gauss and J.F. Stanton, J. Chem. Phys., 102 (1995) 251; J. Gauss and J.F. Stanton, J. Chem. Phys., 103 (1995) 3562.
25. J. Gauss and J.F. Stanton, J. Chem. Phys., 104 (1996) 2574.
26. C. van Wüllen and W. Kutzelnigg, Chem. Phys. Lett., 205 (1993) 563.
27. K. Ruud, T. Helgaker, R. Kobayashi, P. Jørgensen, K.L. Bak and H.J.Aa. Jensen, J. Chem. Phys., 100 (1994) 8178.
28. J.F. Stanton, J. Gauss and H.-U. Siehl, Chem. Phys. Lett., 262 (1996) 183.
29. R. Pellicciari, B. Natalini, B. Sadeghpour, M. Marinozzi, J.P. Snyder, B.L. Williamson, J.T. Kuethe and A. Padwa, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 118 (1996) 1.
30. A. Schäfer, H. Horn and R. Ahlrichs, J. Chem. Phys. 97 (1992) 2571.
31. Cartesian polarization functions have been used with α(d) = 0.8 for carbon and α(p) = 0.8 for hydrogen.
32. R. Ditchfield, Mol. Phys., 27 (1974) 789; K. Wolinksi, J.F. Hinton and P. Pulay, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 112 (1990) 8251.
33. R. Ditchfield, Mol. Phys., 27 (1974) 789; K. Wolinksi, J.F. Hinton and P. Pulay, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 112 (1990) 8251.
34. F. London, J. Phys. Radium, 8 (1937) 397.
35. S. Sieber, P. von R. Schleyer and J. Gauss, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 115 (1993) 6987.
36. P. Buzek, P. von R. Schleyer, H. Vancik, Z. Mihalic, and J. Gauss, Angew. Chem., 104 (1994) 470.
37. J.F. Stanton, J. Gauss, J.D. Watts, W.J. Lauderdale and R.J. Bartlett, Int. J. Quantum Chem. Symp., 26 (1992) 879.