Coherence correlations in the dissipative two-state system

Physical Review E - Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and Related Interdisciplinary Topics

Volumn 58, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 4288-4298

  Lang, Gunther ^a   Paladino, Elisabetta ^a,b   Weiss, Ulrich ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STUTTGART   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CATANIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4243796466     PISSN: 1063651X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.58.4288     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. A. J. Leggett, S. Chakravarty, A. T. Dorsey, M. P. A. Fisher, A. Garg, and W. Zwerger, Rev. Mod. Phys. 59, 1 (1987)
2. Rev. Mod. Phys.A. J. LeggettS. ChakravartyA. T. DorseyM. P. A. FisherA. GargW. Zwerger67, 725(E)(1995).
3. U. Weiss, Quantum Dissipative Systems, Series in Modern Condensed Matter Physics, Vol. 2, 2nd ed. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1998).
4. D. M. Eigler and E. K. Schweizer, Nature (London) 344, 524 (1990)
5. A. A. Louis and J. P. Sethna, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 1363 (1995).PRLTAO
6. S. Han, J. Lapointe, and J. E. Lukens, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 810 (1991).PRLTAO
7. M. Sassetti and U. Weiss, Phys. Rev. A 41, 5383 (1990).PLRAAN
8. M. Sassetti and U. Weiss, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 2262 (1990).PRLTAO
9. S. Chakravarty and J. Rudnick, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 501 (1995).PRLTAO
10. T. A. Costi and C. Kieffer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1683 (1996)
11. T. A. Costi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1038 (1998).
12. K. Völker, e-print cond-mat/9712080.
13. R. Egger, H. Grabert, and U. Weiss, Phys. Rev. E 55, R3809 (1997).PLEEE8
14. F. Lesage and H. Saleur, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4370 (1998).PRLTAO
15. F. Lesage, H. Saleur, and S. Skorik, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 3388 (1996)
16. F. LesageH. SaleurS. SkorikNucl. Phys. B 474, 602 (1996).
17. J. T. Stockburger and C. H. Mak, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2657 (1998).PRLTAO
18. M. Grifoni, M. Winterstetter, and U. Weiss, Phys. Rev. E 56, 334 (1997).PLEEE8
19. S. P. Strong, Phys. Rev. E 55, 6636 (1997).PLEEE8
20. F. Guinea, Phys. Rev. B 32, 4486 (1985).PRBMDO
21. R. Silbey and A. Harris, J. Chem. Phys. 80, 2615 (1984).JCPSA6
22. The Hamiltonian Hcoh=-ħΔσ̃x/2+HR,I, where HR,I is the second term in Eq. (1), effectively describes a decoupled system, Hcoh=U-1HcohU=-ħΔσx/2+HR, exhibiting persistent oscillations.
23. This is equivalent to calculating the autocorrelation function of the bare σx with respect to the transformed Hamiltonian H̃=U-1HU 15. For K=12, the Hamiltonian H̃ describes the Toulouse limit of the resonance level model.
24. H. Grabert, P. Schramm, and G.-L. Ingold, Phys. Rep. 168, 115 (1988).PRPLCM
25. In order to avoid boundary terms in the influence functional (30), we have included a jump at time t.
26. A similar argument was given in Ref. 15 within an imaginary-time approach.