Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt correlation and Clauser-Horne correlation do not lead to the largest violations of Bell’s inequality

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 57, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 114-119

  Ardehali, M ^a  

^a NEC CORPORATION   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4243774383     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: 10941622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.57.114     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. J. S. Bell, Physics (Long Island City, N.Y.) 1, 195 (1965).PYCSAP
2. A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935).PHRVAO
3. For an introduction to Bell’s theorem and its experimental implications see F. Selleri, in Quantum Mechanics Versus Local Realism, edited by F. Selleri (Plenum, New York, 1988).
4. J. F. Clauser, M. A. Horne, A. Shimony, and R. A. Holt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880 (1969).PRLTAO
5. S. J. Freedman and J. F. Clauser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 28, 938 (1972).PRLTAO
6. J. F. Clauser and M. A. Horne, Phys. Rev. D 10, 526 (1974).PRVDAQ
7. J. F. Clauser and A. Shimony, Rep. Prog. Phys. 41, 1881 (1978); see in particular pp. 1891–1896.RPPHAG
8. J. S. Bell, in Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Proceedings of the International School of Physics “Enrico Fermi, ” Course XLIX, edited by B. d’Espagnat (Academic, New York, 1971).
9. A. Garuccio and V. Rapisarda, Nuovo Cimento A 65, 269 (1981).NIFAAM
10. M. Ardehali, Phys. Rev. A 47, 1633 (1993).PLRAAN
11. M. Ardehali, Phys. Rev. A 49, R3145 (1994).PLRAAN
12. D. Bohm, Quantum Theory (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1951), pp. 614–823.
13. A. Einstein, in Albert Einstein, Philosopher Scientist, edited by P. A. Schilp (Library of Living Philosophers, Evanston, 1949), p. 85.
14. A. Aspect, P. Grangier, and G. Roger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 460 (1981); PRLTAO
15. Phys. Rev. Lett.A. AspectP. GrangierG. Roger49, 91 (1982);
16. Phys. Rev. Lett.A. AspectP. GrangierG. Roger49, 1804 (1982);
17. Phys. Rev. Lett.Z. Y. Ou, X. Y. Zou, L. J. Wang, and L. Mandel, 65, 321 (1990);
18. Phys. Rev. Lett.Y. H. Shih and C. O. Alley, 61, 2921 (1988).
19. It is important to emphasize that a supplementary assumption is required primarily because the solid angle covered by the aperture of the apparatus Ω is much less than 4π and not because the efficiency of the detectors η is much smaller than 1. In fact, in the previous experiments 14, (Formula presented) However, because (Formula presented) all previous experiments needed supplementary assumptions to test locality.
20. F. Selleri, in Problems in Quantum Physics: Gdańsk ’87, edited by L. Kostro, A. Posiewnik, J. Pykacz, and M. Zukowski (World Scientific, Singapore, 1988), p. 256.
21. F. Selleri, in Microphysical Reality and Quantum Formalism, edited by A. van der Merwe, F. Selleri, and G. Tarrozi (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1988).
22. J. G. Rarity and P. R. Tapster, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 2495 (1989).PRLTAO
23. L. R. Kasday, J. D. Ullman, and C. S. Wu, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 15, 586 (1970); BAPSA6
24. A. R. Wilson, J. Lowe, and D. K. Butt, J. Phys. G 2, 613 (1976); JPHGBM
25. M. Bruno, M. d’Agostino, and C. Maroni, Nuovo Cimento B 40, 142 (1977).NIFBAP
26. M. Lamehirachti and W. Mittig, Phys. Rev. D 14, 2543 (1976). PRVDAQ