Scale-invariant fluctuations at different levels of organization in developing heart cell networks

Physical Review E - Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and Related Interdisciplinary Topics

Volumn 61, Issue 3, 2000, Pages

  Soen, Yoav ^a   Braun, Erez ^a  

^a TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYTOLOGY;

DEVELOPING HEARTS; INTER-SPIKE INTERVAL; INTRINSIC PROPERTY; ISOLATED HEART; NETWORK LEVEL; SCALE-INVARIANT; SINGLE CELLS;

CELLS;

ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CELL CULTURE; CYTOLOGY; HEART; HEART MUSCLE; HEART RATE; NEWBORN; PHYSIOLOGY; RAT;

ANIMALS; ANIMALS, NEWBORN; CELLS, CULTURED; HEART; HEART RATE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MYOCARDIUM; RATS;

EID: 4243747567     PISSN: 1063651X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.61.R2216     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. P. C. Ivanov, M. G. Rosenblum, C. K. Peng, J. Mietus, S. Havlin, H. E. Stanley, and A. L. Goldberger, Nature (London) 383, 323 (1996)
2. C. K. Peng, S. Havlin, H. E. Stanley, and A. L. Goldberger, Chaos 5(1), 82 (1995)
3. R. G. Turcott and M. C. Teich, Ann. Biomed. Eng. 24, 269 (1996).
4. S. B. Lowen and M. C. Teich, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99, 3585 (1996)
5. M. C. Teich, C. Heneghan, S. B. Lowen, T. Ozaki, and E. Kaplan, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 14, 529 (1997)
6. R. G. Turcott, P. D. R. Barker, and M. C. Teich, J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 52, 253 (1995).
7. C. K. Peng, J. Mietus, J. M. Hausdorff, S. Havlin, H. E. Stanley, and A. L. Goldberger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1343 (1993).
8. B. J. West and W. Deering, Phys. Rep. 246, 1 (1994).
9. Y. Soen, N. Cohen, D. Lipson, and E. Braun, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3556 (1999).
10. A. Toib, V. Lyakhov, and S. Marom, J. Neurosci. 18, 1893 (1998)
11. M. M. Frank and S. Marom, Eur. J. Phys. 438, 213 (1999).
12. G. L. Millhauser, E. E. Salpeter, and R. E. Oswald, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85, 1503 (1988).
13. S. B. Lowen, L. S. Liebovitch, and J. A. White, Phys. Rev. E 59, 5970 (1999).
14. N. Cohen, Y. Soen, and E. Braun, Physica A 249, 600 (1998).
15. S. Thurner, S. B. Lowen, M. C. Feurstein, H. G. Feichtinger, and M. C. Teich, Fractals 5, 565 (1997).
16. G. M. Viswanathan, C. K. Peng, H. E. Stanley, and A. L. Goldberger, Phys. Rev. E 55, 845 (1997).
17. S. Marom, J. Membr. Biol. 161, 105 (1998), and references therein.
18. L. S. Liebovitch and J. M. Sullivan, Biophys. J. 52, 979 (1987)
19. Biophys. J.G. L. Millhauser, E. E. Salpeter, and R. E. Oswald, 54, 1165 (1988).
20. J. Rinzel and G.B. Ermentrout, in Methods in Neuronal Modeling, edited by C. Koch and I. Segev (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1989), p. 167.
21. (Formula presented) (Formula presented) and (Formula presented)
22. Model parameters are (Formula presented) (Formula presented) (Formula presented) (Formula presented) (Formula presented) (Formula presented) (Formula presented) (Formula presented) [0.04 in the second trace of Fig. 33(b)], (Formula presented) (Formula presented) and (Formula presented) The inset traces are obtained by changing (Formula presented) (Formula presented) (Formula presented) and (Formula presented) to 0.85, 0.02, 0.02, and 0.1, respectively. A (nonintegrated) white noise term (Formula presented) was added to the parameter (Formula presented) in order to generate noisier traces that look more like the experimental ones. This has no effect on the scaling.