τ-μ flavor violation as a probe of the scale of new physics

Physical Review D

Volumn 66, Issue 5, 2002, Pages

  Black, Deirdre ^a   Han, Tao ^b   He, Hong Jian ^c   Sher, Marc ^d  

^a THEORY CENTER   (United States)

^b University of Wisconsin Madison   (United States)

^c The University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

^d The College of William and Mary   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; DATA ANALYSIS; MECHANICAL PROBE; OSCILLATION; PHENOMENOLOGY; PHYSICS;

EID: 4243698338     PISSN: 05562821     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.66.053002     Document Type: Article

References (95)

1. P. Fayet and S. Ferrara, Phys. Rep. 32, 249 (1977);
2. H.P. Nilles, Phys. Rep. ibid. 110, 1 (1984);
3. H.E. Haber and G.L. Kane, Phys. Rep. Ibid. 117, 75 (1985)
4. ; for recent reviews, see, e.g., in Perspectives on Supersymmetry, edited by G.L. Kane (World Scientific, Singapore, 1998).
5. For a comprehensive analysis see, e.g., S. Dimopoulos and D. Sutter, Nucl. Phys. B452, 496 (1996);
6. F. Gabbiani, E. Gabrielli, A. Masiero, and L. Silvestrini, Nucl. Phys. ibid. B477, 321 (1996), and references therein.
7. For an updated review of the dynamical symmetry breaking and compositeness, see C.T. Hill and E.H., Simmons, hep-ph/0203079, and references therein.
8. H. Fritzsch, Phys. Lett. 73B, 317 (1978).
9. For a recent review, H. Fritzsch and Z.Z. Xing, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 45, 1 (2000).
10. C.D. Frogatt and H.B. Nielsen, Nucl. Phys. B147, 277 (1979).
11. Y. Nir, M. Leurer, and N. Seiberg, Nucl. Phys. B309, 337 (1993);
12. Y. Nir, M. Leurer, and N. Seiberg, Nucl. Phys. B420, 468 (1994);
13. for recent constructions, see, e.g., J.L. Diaz-Cruz, H.-J. He, and C.-P. Yuan, Phys. Lett. B 530, 179 (2002);
14. Y. Nir and G. Raz, hep-ph/0206064.
15. N. Cabibbo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10, 531 (1963);
16. M. Kobayashi and T. Maskawa, Prog. Theor. Phys. 49, 652 (1973).
17. T.P. Cheng and M. Sher, Phys. Rev. D 35, 3484 (1987).
18. A. Antaramian, L.J. Hall, and A. Rasin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1871 (1992);
19. L.J. Hall and S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. D 48, 979 (1993).
20. C.G. Callen, S. Coleman, J. Wess, and B. Zumino, Phys. Rev. 177, 2247 (1969).
21. S. Weinberg, Physica A 96, 327 (1979).
22. T. Appelquist and C. Bernard, Phys. Rev. D 22, 200 (1980);
23. A.C. Langhitano, Nucl. Phys. B188, 118 (1981).
24. R.D. Peccei and X. Zhang, Nucl. Phys. B337, 269 (1990);
25. R.D. Peccei, S. Peris, and X. Zhang, Nucl. Phys. ibid. B349, 305 (1991);
26. T. Han, R.D. Peccei, and X. Zhang, Nucl. Phys. ibid. B454, 527 (1995).
27. C.P. Burgess, S. Godfrey, H. Konig, D. London, and I. Maksymyk, Phys. Rev. D 49, 6115 (1994).
28. W. Buchmüller and D. Wyler, Nucl. Phys. B268, 621 (1986).
29. Super-Kamiokande Collaboration, S. Fukuda et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3999 (2000);
30. S. Fukuda et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5656 (2001);
31. Y. Fukuda et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. ibid. 82, 1810 (1999);
32. Y. Fukuda et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1562 (1998);
33. Y. Fukuda et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1158 (1998);
34. Super-Kamiokande Collaboration, T. Toshito, hep-ex/0105023.
35. Super-Kamiokande Collaboration, S. Fukuda et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5656 (2001);
36. SNO Collaboration, Q.R. Ahmad et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. ibid. 87, 071301 (2001);
37. Q.R. Ahmad et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 011301 (2002);
38. Q.R. Ahmad et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 011302 (2002).
39. atm≃45° [16].
40. Z. Maki, M. Nakagawa, and S. Sakata, Prog. Theor. Phys. 28, 870 (1962).
41. The MNS mixing matrix in the lepton charged current is the analogue of CKM in the quark charged current, but they exhibit completely, different structures.
42. For a recent review, see, e.g., M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia and Y. Nir, hep-ph/0202058.
43. E. Eichten, K.D. Lane, and M.E. Peskin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 811 (1983).
44. j in each fermion bilinear, which will not be considered further [similar to the restriction we have added in Eq.(3)].
45. A. Manohar and H. Georgi, Nucl. Phys. B234, 189 (1984).
46. H. Georgi, Phys. Lett. B 298, 187 (1993).
47. β) channels.
48. For the minimal top-seesaw models [3], the composite Higgs boson mass is generally in the range around 0.4-1 TeV [51,52].
49. The case with N>3 contains additional N-3 light singlet sterile neutrinos and is awaiting confirmation from the ongoing MiniBooNE experiment at Fermilab [53].
50. The nonzero neutrino masses can arise from a seesaw mechanism [54,55], a radiative mechanism [56,57], or they may have a dynamical origin [58,59].
51. μ in the neutrino mass matrix.
52. C.T. Hill, Phys. Lett. B 345, 483 (1995);
53. C.T. Hill, Phys. Lett. B 266, 419 (1991).
54. R.S. Chivukula, E.H. Simmons, and J. Terning, Phys. Lett. B 331, 383 (1994);
55. R.S. Chivukula and E.H. Simmons, Phys. Rev. D 66, 015006 (2002).
56. X. Li and E. Ma, J. Phys. G 19, 1265 (1993).
57. J. Erler and P. Langacker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 212 (2000).
58. T. Huang, Z.H. Lin, L.Y. Shan, and X. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 64, 071301 (2001).
59. H.-J. He and C.-P. Yuan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 28 (1999).
60. C.P. Burgess and D. London, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 3428 (1992);
61. Phys. Rev. D 48, 4337 (1993).
62. 0) which may be used for estimating the size of radiative loop corrections.
63. T. Appelquist and J. Carrazone, Phys. Rev. D 11, 2856 (1975).
64. phys is proportional to a certain coupling of this state with light fields (which remain in the low energy theory).
65. Particle Data Group, D.G. Groom et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 15, 1 (2000), and http://pdg.lbi.gov
66. T. Feldman, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 15, 159 (2000).
67. J.J. Sakurai, Currents and Mesons (Chicago University Press, Chicago, 1969).
68. M. Sher and Y. Yuan, Phys. Rev. D 44, 1461 (1991).
69. N. Isgur et al., Phys. Rev. D 39, 799 (1989).
70. Jon Urheim (private communication).
71. CDF Collaboration, D. Gerdes in New Directions for High-Energy Physics, Snowmass, 1996, FERMILAB-CONF-96-342-E, p. 32 (hep-ex/9609013).
72. CLEO Collaboration, D. Cinabro et al., Phys. Lett. B 348, 129 (1994).
73. M denotes a light pseudoscalar meson.
74. HQET stands for heavy quark effective theory.
75. R.S. Chivukula and C. Hölbling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 511 (2000).
76. H.-J. He, C.T. Hill, and T. Tait, Phys. Rev. D 65, 055006 (2002).
77. MiniBooNE Collaboration, A. Bazarko et al., Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) 91, 210 (2001).
78. M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond and R. Slansky, in Supergravity, Proceedings of the Workshop, Stony Brook, New York, 1979, edited by D. Freedman and P. van Niewenhuizen (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1979), p. 315;
79. T. Yanagida, in Proceedings of the Workshop on Unified Theories and Baryon Number in the Universe, Tsuhuba, Japan, 1979, edited by O. Sawada and A. Sugamoto (KEK Report No. 79-18, Tsukuba, 1979) p. 79.
80. R.N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 912 (1980).
81. A. Zee, Phys. Lett. 93B, 389 (1980);
82. Phys. Lett. 161B, 141 (1985).
83. L. Wolfenstein, Nucl. Phys. B175, 92 (1980);
84. S.T. Petcov, Phys. Lett. 115B, 401 (1982).
85. T. Appelquist and R. Shrock, hep-ph/0204141.
86. P. Sikivie, L. Susskind, M. Voloshin, and V. Zakharov, Nucl. Phys. B173, 189 (1980);
87. B. Holdom, Phys. Rev. D 23, 1637 (1981);
88. Phys. Lett. B 246, 169 (1990);
89. T. Appelquist and J. Teming, Phys. Rev. D 50, 2116 (1994).
90. For a recent review, see, e.g:, G. Altarelli and F. Feruglio, Phys. Rep. 320, 295 (2000); hep-ph/0206077.
91. E.g., J. Ellis, M. Raidal, and T. Yanagida, hep-ph/0206300;
92. K.S. Babu and C. Kolda, hep-ph/0206310;
93. I. Hinchliffe and F. Paige, Phys. Rev. D 63, 115006 (2001);
94. J.L. Feng, Y. Nir, and Y. Shadmi, Phys. Rev. D ibid. 61, 113005 (2000).
95. M.J. Veltman, Acta Phys. Pol. B 12, 437 (1981).