Semiclassical quantization of the hydrogen atom in crossed electric and magnetic fields

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 67, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 634111-634117

  Bartsch, Thomas ^a   Main, Jörg ^a   Wunner, Günter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STUTTGART   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS; ELECTRIC FIELD EFFECTS; MAGNETIC FIELD EFFECTS; MATRIX ALGEBRA;

CLOSED-ORBIT THEORY;

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 4243655582     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. M.L. Du and J.B. Delos, Phys. Rev. A 38, 1896 (1988).
2. E.B. Bogomolny, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 96, 487 (1989) [Sov. Phys. JETP 69, 275 (1989)].
3. E.B. Bogomolny, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 96, 487 (1989) [Sov. Phys. JETP 69, 275 (1989)].
4. J. Gao, J.B. Delos, and M. Baruch, Phys. Rev. A 46, 1449 (1992).
5. J.-M. Mao, K.A. Rapelje, S.J. Blodgett-Ford, and J.B. Delos, Phys. Rev. A 48, 2117 (1993).
6. M. Courtney, Phys. Rev. A 51, 4558 (1995).
7. J. Main, Ph. D. thesis, Universität Bielefeld, Germany, 1991.
8. G. Raithel, M. Fauth, and H. Walther, Phys. Rev. A 44, 1898 (1991).
9. A.D. Peters and J.B. Delos, Phys. Rev. A 47, 3020 (1993).
10. B. Hüpper, J. Main, and G. Wunner, Phys. Rev. A 53, 744 (1996).
11. K. Weibert, J. Main, and G. Wunner, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 268, 172 (1998).
12. P.A. Dando, T.S. Monteiro, D. Delande, and K.T. Taylor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 1099 (1995).
13. P.A. Dando, T.S. Monteiro, D. Delande, and K.T. Taylor, Phys. Rev. A 54, 127 (1996).
14. A. Matzkin and T.S. Monteiro, Phys, Rev. Lett. 87, 143002 (2001).
15. J. Main, V.A. Mandelshtam, G. Wunner, and H.S. Taylor, Nonlinearity 11, 1015 (1998).
16. J. Main, Phys. Rep. 316, 233 (1999).
17. J. Main and G, Wunner, Phys. Rev. A 59, R2548 (1999).
18. T. Bartsch, J. Main, and G. Wunner, Phys. Rev. A 67, 063410 (2003) (preceding paper).
19. B.E. Granger and C.H. Greene, Phys. Rev. A 62, 012511 (2000).
20. M. Aymar, C.H. Greene, and E. Luc-Koenig, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 1.015 (1996).
21. F. Robicheaux, Phys. Rev. A 48, 4162 (1993).
22. T. Bartsch, The Hydrogen Atom in an Electric Field and in Crossed Electric and Magnetic Fields: Closed-Orbit Theory and Semiclassical Quantization (Cuvillier, Göttingen, Germany, 2002).
23. M. C. Gutzwiller, Chaos in Classical and Quantum Mechanics (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1990).
24. T. Bartsch, e-print physics/0301017.
25. M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun, Pocketbook of Mathematical Functions (Verlag Harri Deutsch, Frankfurt/Main, 1984).
26. J. Rao, D. Delande, and K.T. Taylor, J. Phys. B 34, L391 (2001).
27. T. Bartsch, J. Main, and G. Wunner, Phys. Rev. E 64, 056705 (2001).
28. J. Main, P.A. Dando, Dž. Belkić, and H.S. Taylor, J. Phys. A 33, 1247 (2000).
29. J. Main, K. Weibert, V.A. Mandelshtam, and G. Wunner, Phys. Rev. E 60, 1639 (1999).
30. J.N.L. Connor, Mol. Phys. 26, 1217 (1973).
31. J.N.L. Connor, Mol. Phys. 31, 33 (1976).
32. A.M. Ozorio de Almeida and J.H. Hannay, J. Phys. A 20, 5873 (1987).
33. M. Sieber, J. Phys. A 29, 4715 (1996).
34. H. Schomerus and M. Sieber, J. Phys. A 30, 4537 (1997).
35. M. Sieber and H. Schomerus, J. Phys. A 31, 165 (1998).
36. J. Main and G. Wunner, Phys. Rev. A 55, 1743 (1997).
37. M. Kuś, F. Haake, and D. Delande, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 2167 (1993).
38. H. Schomerus, Europhys. Lett. 38, 423 (1997).
39. H. Schomerus, J. Phys. A 31, 4167 (1998).
40. T. Bartsch, J. Main, and G. Wunner, J. Phys. A 32, 3013 (1999).
41. T. Bartsch, J. Main, and G. Wunner, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 277, 19 (1999).
42. D. P. L. Castrigiano and S. A. Hayes, Catastrophe Theory (Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1993).
43. I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhik, Table of Integrals, Series, and Products (Academic, New York, 1965).
44. S. Tomsovic, M. Grinberg, and D. Ullmo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4346 (1995).
45. D. Ullmo, M. Grinberg, and S. Tomsovic, Phys. Rev. E 54, 136 (1996).
46. M. Sieber, J. Phys. A 30, 4563 (1997).
47. T. Bartsch, J. Main, and G. Wunner, Phys. Rev. A 66, 033404 (2002).
48. The regular and irregular Coulomb functions and g used by Granger and Greene [18] differ from those used by Robicheaux [20] in that they are energy normalized in Rydberg rather than in Hartree units. The radial function matrices given here agree in normalization with those adopted by Robicheaux, whereas the matrices used by Granger and Greene are inconsistent with their Eq. (12).