Computing the gravitational self-force on a compact object plunging into a Schwarzschild black hole

Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology

Volumn 66, Issue 6, 2002, Pages

  Lousto, Carlos O ^b  

^a ALBERT EINSTEIN INSTITUT   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT BROWNSVILLE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; ASTRONOMY; COSMOS; GRAVITY; PARTICLE SIZE; RADIATION SICKNESS;

EID: 4243457012     PISSN: 15507998     EISSN: 15502368     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.66.061502     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Up to date information concerning the joint NASA-ESA project LISA can be found in the project’s webpage at http://lisa.jpl.nasa.gov/
2. A. Ghez, M. Morris, E.E. Becklin, T. Kremenek, and A. Tanner, Nature (London) 407, 349 (2000).
3. S.A. Hughes, Phys. Rev. D 61, 084004 (2000), and references therein.
4. Y. Mino, M. Sasaki, and T. Tanaka, Phys. Rev. D 55, 3457 (1997).
5. T.C. Quinn and R.M. Wald, Phys. Rev. D 56, 3381 (1997).
6. The mode-sum scheme was first introduced for the scalar SF in L. Barack and A. Ori, Phys. Rev. D 61, 061502(R) (2000);
7. Phys. Rev. DL. Barack, 62, 084027 (2000);
8. for an implementation of this method in the scalar case, see, e.g., L.M. Burko, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4529 (2000);
9. L. Barack and L.M. Burko, Phys. Rev. D 62, 084040 (2000);
10. Phys. Rev. DL.M. Burko and Y.-T. Liu, 64, 024006 (2001).
11. L. Barack, Phys. Rev. D 64, 084021 (2001).
12. L. Barack, Y. Mino, H. Nakano, A. Ori, and M. Sasaki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 091101 (2002).
13. C.O. Lousto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5251 (2000).
14. L. Barack and A. Ori, Phys. Rev. D 64, 124003 (2001).
15. L. Barack and C.O. Lousto (in preparation).
16. T. Regge and J.A. Wheeler, Phys. Rev. 108, 1063 (1957).
17. F.J. Zerilli, Phys. Rev. D 2, 2141 (1970).
18. C.O. Lousto, Class. Quantum Grav. 18, 3989 (2001).
19. V. Moncrief, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 88, 323 (1974).
20. C.O. Lousto and R.H. Price, Phys. Rev. D 55, 2124 (1997);
21. Phys. Rev. DC.O. LoustoR.H. Price56, 6439 (1997);
22. Phys. Rev. DC.O. LoustoR.H. Price57, 1073 (1998).
23. The “standard” (Formula presented) solution constructed by Zerilli 13 is pathological at the event horizon. Here we adopt a different, physically consistent, monopole solution having (Formula presented) in the RW notation 12. We shall discuss this issue in more detail in 11.
24. A. Ori, Phys. Lett. A 202, 347 (1995).
25. T.C. Quinn and R.M. Wald, Phys. Rev. D 60, 064009 (1999).