Inclusive η′ production from the γ(1S)

Physical Review D

Volumn 67, Issue 5, 2003, Pages

  Artuso, M ^a   Boulahouache, C ^a   Blusk, S ^a   Bukin, K ^a   Dambasuren, E ^a   Mountain, R ^a   Muramatsu, H ^a   Nandakumar, R ^a   Skwarnicki, T ^a   Stone, S ^a   Wang, J C ^a   Mahmood, A H ^b   Csorna, S E ^c   Danko, I ^c   Bonvicini, G ^d   Cinabro, D ^d   Dubrovin, M ^d   McGee, S ^d   Bornheim, A ^e   Lipeles, E ^e   Pappas, S P ^e   Shapiro, A ^e   Sun, W M ^e   Weinstein, A J ^e   Briere, R A ^f   Chen, G P ^f   Ferguson, T ^f   Tatishvili, G ^f   Vogel, H ^f   Adam, N E ^g   Alexander, J P ^g   Berkelman, K ^g   Boisvert, V ^g   Cassel, D G ^g   Drell, P S ^g   Duboscq, J E ^g   Ecklund, K M ^g   Ehrlich, R ^g   Galik, R S ^g   Gibbons, L ^g   Gittelman, B ^g   Gray, S W ^g   Hartill, D L ^g   Heltsley, B K ^g   Hsu, L ^g   Jones, C D ^g   Kandaswamy, J ^g   Kreinick, D L ^g   Magerkurth, A ^g   Mahlke Kruger H ^g   Meyer, T O ^g   Mistry, N B ^g   Patterson, J R ^g   Peterson, D ^g   Pivarski, J ^g   Richichi, S J ^g   Riley, D ^g   Sadoff, A J ^g   Schwarthoff, H ^g   Shepherd, M R ^g   Thayer, J G ^g   Urner, D ^g   Wilksen, T ^g   Warburton, A ^g   Weinberger, M ^g   Athar, S B ^h   Avery, P ^h   Breva Newell, L ^h   Potlia, V ^h   Stoeck, H ^h   Yelton, J ^h   Benslama, K ⁱ   Eisenstein, B I ⁱ   Gollin, G D ⁱ   Karliner, I ⁱ   Lowrey, N ⁱ   Plager, C ⁱ   Sedlack, C ⁱ   Selen, M ⁱ   Thaler, J J ⁱ   Williams, J ⁱ   Edwards, K W ^j,u   Ammar, R ^k   Besson, D ^k   Zhao, X ^k   Anderson, S ^l   Frolov, V V ^l   Gong, D T ^l   Kubota, Y ^l   Li, S Z ^l   Poling, R ^l   Smith, A ^l   Stepaniak, C J ^l   Urheim, J ^l   Metreveli, Z ^m   Seth, K K ^m   Tomaradze, A ^m   Zweber, P ^m   Ahmed, S ⁿ   Alam, M S ⁿ   Ernst, J ⁿ   Jian, L ⁿ   Saleem, M ⁿ   Wappler, F ⁿ   Arms, K ^o   Eckhart, E ^o   Gan, K K ^o   Gwon, C ^o   Honscheid, K ^o   Hufnagel, D ^o   Kagan, H ^o   Kass, R ^o   Pedlar, T K ^o   von Toerne, E ^o   Zoeller, M M ^o   Severini, H ^p   Skubic, P ^p   Dytman, S A ^q   Mueller, J A ^q   Nam, S ^q   Savinov, V ^q   Chen, S ^r   Hinson, J W ^r   Lee, J ^r   Miller, D H ^r   Pavlunin, V ^r   Shibata, E I ^r   Shipsey, I P J ^r   Cronin Hennessy, D ^s   Lyon, A L ^s   Park, C S ^s   Park, W ^s   Thayer, J B ^s   Thorndike, E H ^s   Coan, T E ^t   Gao, Y S ^t   Liu, F ^t   Maravin, Y ^t   Stroynowski, R ^t   more..

^a SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS PAN AMERICAN   (United States)

^c VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^f CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g Cornell University ^*  (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^j CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^k UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^l UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^m NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

ⁿ STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^o OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^p UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

^q UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^r PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^s UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

^t SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^u INSTITUTE OF PARTICLE PHYSICS IPP   (Canada)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATOMIC PARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENERGY; MOLECULAR MODEL; PHYSICS; THEORY; VELOCITY;

EID: 4243379547     PISSN: 05562821     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.67.052003     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. A.L. Kagan, Phys. Rev. D 51, 6196 (1995);
2. M. Neubert, "Heavy Flavour Physics," CERN-TH/95-307, hep-ph/9511409.
3. Particle Data Group, K. Hagiwara et al., Phys. Rev. D 66, 010001 (2002).
4. CLEO Collaboration, T.E. Browder et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1786 (1998).
5. -4 in the η′ momentum range between 2.0 and 2.7 GeV/c. See BABAR Collaboration, B. Aubert et al., "Study of Semi-inclusive Production of η′ Mesons in B Decays," SLAC-PUB-8979, hep-ex/0109034.
6. D. Atwood and A. Soni, Phys. Lett. B 405, 150 (1997).
7. W.S. Hou and B. Tseng, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 434 (1998).
8. A.L. Kagan and A.A. Petrov, hep-ph/9707354;
9. A. Kagan, in Proceedings of the "Seventh International Symposium on Heavy Flavor Physics," Santa Barbara, California, 1997, hep-ph/9806266.
10. A.L. Kagan, in Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium On Heavy Flavor Physics, CalTech, Pasadena, California, 2001, edited by Anders Ryd and Frank C. Porter, AIP Conf. Proc. No. 618 (AIP, Melville, NY, 2002), p. 310;
11. Y. Chen and A.L. Kagan, University of Cincinnati report (in preparation).
12. A. Ali and A.Y. Parkhomenko, Phys. Rev. D 65, 074020 (2002).
13. T. Muta and M.-Z. Yang, Phys. Rev. D 61, 054007 (2000).
14. -4, where he extracted the number from A. Zimmermann, diploma thesis, University of Dortmund, 1992, where no continuum subtraction was attempted. [See also, ARGUS Collaboration, H. Albrecht et al., Z. Phys. C 58, 1199 (1993).]
15. CLEO Collaboration, R. Ammar et al., Phys. Rev. D 57, 1350 (1998).
16. CLEO Collaboration, Y. Kubota et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 320, 66 (1992).
17. CLEO Collaboration, W.Y. Chen et al., Phys. Rev. D 39, 3528 (1989).
18. γ(1S) → qq̄. These latter two directly affect the branching fraction in the qq̄ sample with uncertainties of 1% and 4% respectively. The effects of these two sources to the overall and the ggg sample branching fractions are negligible except for the branching fraction measurement of high energy η′ in the ggg samples, where there are ±2.9% and ±3.6% uncertainties.
19. We fit the Z distribution in the range 0.3