Periodic-orbit theory of the blowout bifurcation

Physical Review E - Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and Related Interdisciplinary Topics

Volumn 56, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 4031-4041

  Nagai, Yoshihiko ^a   Lai, Ying Cheng ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4243299076     PISSN: 1063651X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.56.4031     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. E. Ott, Chaos in Dynamical Systems (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993); K. T. Alligood, T. Saure, and J. A. Yorke, Chaos: An Introduction to Dynamical Systems (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1996).
2. M. J. Feigenbaum, J. Stat. Phys. 19, 25 (1978).JSTPBS
3. A crisis is triggered by the collision of a periodic orbit, usually of low period, embedded in the chaotic attractor, either with the basin boundary (boundary crisis) or with a nonattracting chaotic saddle (interior crisis). See C. Grebogi, E. Ott, and J. A. Yorke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 1507 (1982); PRLTAO
4. Physica D 7, 181 (1983).PDNPDT
5. Basin boundaries in nonlinear systems with multiple coexisting attractors can undergo metamorphoses when an unstable periodic orbit on the boundary collides with a nonattracting chaotic saddle. See C. Grebogi, E. Ott, and J. A. Yorke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 1011 (1986); PRLTAO
6. Physica D 24, 243 (1987).PDNPDT
7. H. E. Nusse, E. Ott, and J. A. Yorke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 2482 (1995); PRLTAO
8. H. E. Nusse and J. A. Yorke, Physica D 90, 242 (1996).PDNPDT
9. “Riddling” means that for every point in the basin of the chaotic attractor in the invariant subspace there are points arbitrarily nearby that belong to the basins of other attractors. See, for example, J. C. Alexander, J. A. Yorke, Z. You, and I. Kan, Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos 2, 795 (1992);
10. I. Kan, Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 31, 68 (1994); BAMOAD
11. E. Ott, J. C. Alexander, I. Kan, J. C. Sommerer, and J. A. Yorke, Physica D 76, 384 (1994); PDNPDT
12. Y.-C. Lai and C. Grebogi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 5047 (1996).PRLTAO
13. Y. C. Lai, C. Grebogi, J. A. Yorke, and S. C. Venkataramani, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 55 (1996); PRLTAO
14. S. C. Venkataramani, B. Hunt, and E. Ott, Phys. Rev. E 54, 1346 (1996); PLEEE8
15. S. C. Venkataramani, B. Hunt, E. Ott, D. J. Gauthier, and J. C. Bienfang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 5361 (1996).PRLTAO
16. Y. Nagai and Y.-C. Lai, Phys. Rev. E 55, R1251 (1997).PLEEE8
17. E. Ott and J. C. Sommerer, Phys. Lett. A 188, 39 (1994).PYLAAG
18. E. A. Spiegel, Ann. (N.Y.) Acad. Sci. 617, 305 (1981); ANYAA9
19. A. S. Pikovsky, Z. Phys. B 55, 149 (1984); ZPCMDN
20. H. Fujisaka and T. Yamada, Prog. Theor. Phys. 74, 919 (1985); PTPKAV
21. 75, 1087 (1986);
22. A. S. Pikovsky and P. Grassberger, J. Phys. A 24, 4587 (1991); JPHAC5
23. A. S. Pikovsky, Phys. Lett. A 165, 33 (1992); PYLAAG
24. N. Platt, E. A. Spiegel, and C. Tresser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 279 (1993); PRLTAO
25. J. F. Heagy, N. Platt, and S. M. Hammel, Phys. Rev. E 49, 1140 (1994); PLEEE8
26. Y.-C. Lai, 53, R4267 (1996);
27. 54, 321 (1996);
28. S. C. Venkataramani, T. M. Antonsen, Jr., E. Ott, and J. C. Sommerer, Physica D 96, 66 (1996).PDNPDT
29. Y. C. Lai, Phys. Rev. E 53, R4267 (1996).PLEEE8
30. At the bifurcation, the natural measure of the chaotic attractor in S becomes unstable.
31. P. Ashwin, J. Buescu, and I. N. Stewart, Phys. Lett. A 193, 126 (1994); PYLAAG
32. Nonlinearity 9, 703 (1996); NONLE5
33. P. Ashwin, P. J. Aston, and M. Nicol, University of Surrey Technical Report, 1996 (unpublished);
34. P. Ashwin and E. Stone, Centre for Interdisciplinary Nonlinear Mathematics Technical Report, 1997 (unpublished).
35. Y.-C. Lai and C. Grebogi, Phys. Rev. E 52, R3313 (1995).PLEEE8
36. A. Katok, Publ. Math. IHES 51, 377 (1980);
37. T. Morita, H. Hata, H. Mori, T. Horita, and K. Tomita, Prog. Theor. Phys. 78, 511 (1987); PTPKAV
38. D. Auerbach, P. Cvitanović, J.-P. Eckmann, G. Gunaratne, and I. Procaccia, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 2387 (1987); PRLTAO
39. G. Gunaratne and I. Procaccia, 59, 1377 (1987);
40. D. Auerbach, B. O’Shaughnessy, and I. Procaccia, Phys. Rev. A 37, 2234 (1988); PLRAAN
41. P. Cvitanović and B. Eckhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 823 (1989); PRLTAO
42. D. P. Lathrop and E. J. Kostelich, Phys. Rev. A 40, 4028 (1989); PLRAAN
43. D. Auerbach, 41, 6692 (1990);
44. D. Pierson and F. Moss, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 2124 (1995); PRLTAO
45. D. Christini and J. J. Collins, 75, 2782 (1995);
46. X. Pei and F. Moss, Nature (London) 379, 619 (1996); NATUAS
47. B. Hunt and E. Ott, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 2254 (1996); PRLTAO
48. P. So, E. Ott, S. J. Schiff, D. T. Kaplan, T. Sauer, and C. Grebogi, 76, 4705 (1996).
49. C. Grebogi, E. Ott, and J. A. Yorke, Phys. Rev. A 36, 3522 (1987); PLRAAN
50. 37, 1711 (1988).
51. Y.-C. Lai, Y. Nagai, and C. Grebogi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 649(1997).PRLTAO
52. The dynamics is hyperbolic on a chaotic attractor if at each point of the trajectory the phase space can be split into an expanding and a contracting subspace and the angle between them is bounded away from zero. Furthermore, the expanding subspace evolves into the expanding one along the trajectory and the same is true for the contracting subspace. Otherwise the set is nonhyperbolic. In general, nonhyperbolicity is a complicating feature because it can cause fundamental difficulties in the study of the chaotic systems, a known one being the shadowability of numerical trajectories by true trajectories [C. Grebogi, S. M. Hammel, and J. A. Yorke, J. Complexity 3, 136 (1987);
53. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 19, 465 (1988); BAMOAD
54. C. Grebogi, S. M. Hammel, J. A. Yorke, and T. Sauer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1527 (1990); PRLTAO
55. S. Dawson, C. Grebogi, T. Sauer, and J. A. Yorke, 73, 1927 (1994)].
56. J. L. Kaplan and J. A. Yorke, in Functional Differential Equations and Approximations of Fixed Points, edited by H.-O. Peitgen and H.-O. Walter, Lecture Notes in Mathematics Vol. 730 (Springer, Berlin, 1979).
57. M. Hénon, Commun. Math. Phys. 50, 69 (1976).CMPHAY
58. The mechanism leading to this scaling behavior is similar to that in the doubling transformation because the chaotic attractor in Fig. 55 is hyperbolic and its unstable direction is the (Formula presented) axis along which the dynamics is the doubling transformation.
59. O. Biham and W. Wenzel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 819 (1989); PRLTAO
60. Phys. Rev. A 42, 4639 (1990).PLRAAN
61. Z. You, E. J. Kostelich, and J. A. Yorke, Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos 1, 605 (1991).
62. A. Pikovsky and P. Grassberger, J. Phys. A 24, 4587 (1991); JPHAC5
63. A. Pikovsky, M. G. Rosenblum, and J. Kurths, Europhys. Lett. 34, 165 (1996); EULEEJ
64. M. Ding and W. Yang, Phys. Rev. E 54, 2489 (1996).PLEEE8
65. J. F. Heagy, T. L. Carroll, and L. M. Pecora, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 3528 (1994).PRLTAO
66. See, for example, K. T. Alligood, T. Sauer, and J. A. Yorke, Chaos: An Introduction to Dynamical Systems (Springer, New York, 1996).
67. H. S. Greenside (private communication).