Residency effects in animal contests

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 271, Issue 1549, 2004, Pages 1707-1711

  Kemp, Darrell J ^a   Wiklund, Christer ^a  

^a STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Bourgeois; Butterfly; Sexual selection; Territoriality; Uncorrelated asymmetry

Indexed keywords

AGONISTIC BEHAVIOR; BUTTERFLY; PRIOR RESIDENCE; SEXUAL SELECTION; TERRITORIALITY;

ARTICLE; BUTTERFLY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOLUTION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEXUAL SELECTION; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; TEMPERATURE ACCLIMATIZATION; TEMPERATURE SENSITIVITY; TERRITORIALITY;

ANIMALIA; LEPIDOPTERA; NYMPHALIDAE; PARARGE; PARARGE AEGERIA;

EID: 4243183576     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2775     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Alcock, J. 1993 Differences in site fidelity among territorial males of the carpenter bee Xylocopa varipuncta (Hymenoptera: Anthophoridae). Behaviour 125, 199-217.
2. Alcock, J. 2001 Animal behavior an evolutionary approach, 7th edn. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
3. Alcock, J. & Bailey, W. J. 1997 Success in territorial defense by male tarantula hawk wasps Hemipepsis ustulata: the role of residency. Ecol. Entomol. 22, 377-383.
4. Austad, S. N., Jones, W. T. & Waser, P. M. 1979 Territorial defence in speckled wood butterflies: why does the resident always win? Anim. Behav. 27, 960-961.
5. Berwaerts, K., Van Dyck, H., Vints, E. & Matthysen, E. 2001 Effect of manipulated wing characteristics and basking posture on thermal properties of the speckled wood butterfly Pararge aegeria (L.). J. Zool. (Lond.) 255, 261-267.
6. Davies, N. B. 1978 Territorial defense in the speckled wood butterfly, Pararge aegeria: the resident always wins. Anim. Behav. 26, 138-147.
7. Dugatkin, L. A. 2004 Principles of animal behavior. New York: Norton.
8. Gotthard, K., Nylin, S. & Wiklund, C. 2000 Mating opportunity and the evolution of sex-specific mortality rates in a butterfly. Oecologia 122, 36-43.
9. Grafen, A. 1987 The logic of divisively asymmetric contests: respect for ownership and the desperado effect. Anim. Behav. 35, 462-467.
10. Hardy, I. C. W. 1998 Butterfly battles: on conventional contests and hot property. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13, 385-386.
11. Hardy, I. C. W. & Field, S. A. 1998 Logistic analysis of animal contests. Anim. Behav. 56, 787-792.
12. Johnsson, J. I. & Forser, A. 2002 Residence duration influences the outcome of territorial conflicts in brown trout (Salmo trutta). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 51, 282-286.
13. Kemp, D. J. 2000 Contest behavior in territorial male butterflies: does size matter? Behav. Ecol. 11, 591-596.
14. Kemp, D. J. & Wiklund, C. 2001 Fighting without weaponry: a review of male-male contest competition in butterflies. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 49, 429-442.
15. Kemp, D. J. & Zalucki, M. P. 1999 Method of handling affects post-capture encounter probabilities in male Hypolimnas bolina (L.) (Nymphalidae). J. Lepid. Soc. 53, 138-141.
16. Krebs, J. R. 1982 Territorial defense in the great tit (Parus major): do residents always win? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 11, 185-194.
17. Leimar, O. & Enquist, M. 1984 The effect of asymmetries in owner-intruder interactions. J. Theor. Biol. 111, 475-491.
18. McFarland, D. 1999 Animal behaviour: psychobiology, ethology and evolution, 3rd edn. Harlow: Longman.
19. Marden, J. H. & Waage, J. K. 1990 Escalated damselfly territorial contests are energetic wars of attrition. Anim. Behav. 39, 954-959.
20. Maynard Smith, J. 1982 Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge University Press.
21. Maynard Smith, J. & Parker, G. A. 1976 The logic of asymmetric contests. Anim. Behav. 24, 159-175.
22. Olsson, M. & Shine, R. 2000 Ownership influences the outcome of male-male contests in the scincid lizard, Niveoscincus microlepidotus. Behav. Ecol. 11, 587-590.
23. Renison, D., Boersma, D. & Martella, M. B. 2002 Winning and losing: causes for viability in outcome of fights in male Magellanic penguins (Spheniscus magellanicus). Behav. Ecol. 13, 462-466.
24. Riechert, S. E. 1998 Game theory and animal contests. In Game theory and animal behaviour (ed. L. A. Dugatkin & H. K. Reeve), pp. 64-93. New York: Oxford University Press.
25. Stutt, A. D. & Willmer, P. 1998 Territorial defense in speckled wood butterflies: do the hottest males always win? Anim. Behav. 55, 1341-1347.
26. Waage, J. K. 1988 Confusion over residency and the escalation of damselfly territorial disputes. Anim. Behav. 36, 586-595.
27. Whitehouse, M. E. A. 1997 Experience influences male-male contests in the spider Argyrodes antipodiana (Theridiidae: Araneae). Anim. Behav. 53, 913-923.
28. Wickman, P.-O. & Wiklund, C. 1983 Territorial defense and its seasonal decline in the speckled wood butterfly (Pararge aegeria). Anim. Behav. 31, 1206-1216.