Questioning lawful access to traffic data

Communications of the ACM

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 77-82

  Escudero Pascual, Alberto ^b   Hosein, Ian ^a  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

^b ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LAWFUL ACCESS; PLAIN OLD TELEPHONE SYSTEM (POTS); PROBLEMATIC ISSUES; TRAFFIC DATA;

CLIENT SERVER COMPUTER SYSTEMS; COMPUTER CRIME; CRYPTOGRAPHY; CYBERNETICS; INTERNET; NETWORK PROTOCOLS; SERVERS; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; TELECOMMUNICATION TRAFFIC; TELEPHONE;

LAW ENFORCEMENT;

EID: 4243175859     PISSN: 00010782     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/971617.971619     Document Type: Review

References (10)

1. Ashcroft, J. Testimony of the Attorney General to the Senate Committee on the Judiciary. Washington D.C. Sept. 25, 2001.
2. Council of Europe. Convention on Cybercrime, ETS No.185.
3. Council of Europe. Convention on Cybercrime Explanatory Report (adopted Nov. 8, 2001).
4. Escudero A. Location data and traffic data. Contribution to the EU Forum on cybercrime. (Brussels, Nov. 2001).
5. Gaspar, R. Looking to the future: Clarity on communications data retention law: A national criminal intelligence service. Submitted to the Home Office for Legislation on Data Retention on behalf of ACPO and ACPO(S); HM Customs & Excise; Security Service; Secret Intelligence Service; and GCHQ (Aug. 2000).
6. Government of Canada. Lawful access-Consultation document. Department of Justice, Industry Canada, Solicitor General Canada (Aug. 25, 2002).
7. Podesta, J. National Press Club Speech. (Washington D.C. July 17, 2000).
8. Reno, J. Law enforcement in Cyberspace. Address presented to the Commonwealth Club of California, San Francisco, 1996.
9. U.K. Hansard. House of Lords (Committee Stage). Column 1012, June 28, 2000. The Stationery Office Ltd.
10. U.S. Delegation. Discussion Paper for Data Preservation Workshop. G8 Conference on High-Tech Crime. (Tokyo, May 22-24 2001).