Temporal changes in perceived constraints to visiting state parks

Journal of Leisure Research

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 160-182

  Crompton, John L ^a   Kim, Seong Seop ^b  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Sejong University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Longitudinal design; Perceived constraints; State park visitation

Indexed keywords

PERCEPTION; RECREATIONAL ACTIVITY; TEMPORAL ANALYSIS; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR;

NORTH AMERICA; TEXAS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 4243089481     PISSN: 00222216     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00222216.2004.11950018     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Babbie, E. (1998). The practice of social research. New York: Wadsworth Publishing.
2. Backman, S. J., & Crompton, J. L. (1989). Discriminating between continuers and discontinuers of two public leisure services. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 7, 56-71.
3. Crawford, D. W., & Godbey, G. (1987). Reconceptualizing barriers to family leisure. Leisure Scienes, 9, 119-127.
4. Crawford, D. W., Jackson, E. L., & Godbey, G. (1991). A hierarchical model of leisure constraints. Leisure Sciences, 13, 309-320.
5. Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 98-104.
6. Crompton, J. L., & Lamb, C. W. (1986). Marketing government and social services. New York: John Wiley.
7. Crompton, J. L. (2001). On-site sampling: A potential source of overestimating visitor use. Journal of Travel Research, 39, 321-322.
8. Dillman, D. A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York: John Wiley.
9. Freysinger, V. J. (1999). Life span and life course: Perspectives on leisure. In E. L. Jackson and T. L. Burton (Eds.), Leisure Studies: Prospects for the Twenty-First Century (pp. 253-270). State College, PA: Venture Publishing.
10. Harris, C. C., & Driver, B. L. (1987). Recreation user fees: Pros and cons. Journal of Forestry, 85(5), 25-29.
11. Henderson, K. A., & Allen, K. (1991). The ethic of care: Leisure possibilities and constraints for women. Society and Leisure, 14, 97-113.
12. Henderson, K. A., & Bialeschki, D. (1991). A sense of entitlement to leisure as constraint and empowerment for women. Leisure Sciences, 13, 51-65.
13. Henderson, K. A., Stalnaker, D., & Taylor, G. (1988). The relationship between barriers to recreation and gender-role personality traits for women. Journal of Leisure Research, 20, 69-80.
14. Hubbard, J., & Mannell, R. C. (2001). Testing competing models of the leisure constraint negotiation process in a corporate employee recreation setting. Leisure Sciences, 23, 145-163.
15. Jackson, E. L. (1991). Leisure constraints/ Constrained leisure. Leisure, Sciences, 13, 273-278.
16. Jackson, E. L., Crawford, D. W., & Godbey, G. (1993). Negotiation of leisure constraints. Leisure Sciences, 15, 1-11.
17. Jackson, E. L., & Dunn, E. (1991). Is constrained leisure an internally homogeneous concept? Leisure Sciences, 13, 167-184.
18. Jackson, E. L., & Scott, D. (1999). Constraints on leisure and recreation. In E. L. Jackson and T. L. Burton (Eds.), Leisure studies: Prospects for the twenty-first century (pp. 299-321). State College, PA: Venture Publishing.
19. Jackson, E. L., & Witt, P. A. (1994). Change and stability in leisure constraints: A comparison of two surveys conducted four years apart. Journal of Leisure Research, 26, 322-336.
20. Kay, T., & Jackson, G. (1991). Leisure despite constraints: The impact of leisure constraints on leisure participation. Journal of Leisure Research, 23, 301-313.
21. Mannell, R. C., & Zuzanek, J. (1991). The nature and variability of constraints in daily life: The case of the physically active leisure of older adults. Leisure Sciences, 13, 337-351.
22. Meyersohn, R. (1968). Television and the rest of leisure. Public Opinion Ouarterly, 32, 102-112.
23. Norman, W. (1995). Perceived constraints: A new approach to segmenting the vacation travel market. In Abstracts from the 1995 Symposium on Leisure Research (p. 113). Arlington, VA: National Recreation and Park Association.
24. rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
25. Parasuraman, A. (1986). Marketing Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
26. Raymore, L. A., Godbey, G. C., & Crawford, D. W. (1994). Self-esteem, gender, and socio-economic status: Their relation to perceptions of constraints on leisure among adolescents. Journal of Leisure Research, 26, 99-118.
27. Raymore, L. A., Godbey, G. C., Crawford, D. W., & von Eye, A. (1993). Nature and process of leisure constraints: An empirical test. Leisure Sciences, 15, 99-133.
28. Scott, D. (1991). The problematic nature of participation in contract bridge: A qualitative study of group-related constraints. Leisure Sciences, 13, 321-336.
29. Scott, D. (1993). Time scarcity and its implications for leisure behavior and leisure delivery. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 11(3), 51-60.
30. Scott, D., & Jackson, E. L. (1996). Factors that limit and strategies that might encourage people's use of public parks. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 14, 1-17.
31. Scott, D., & Munson, W. (1994). Perceived constraints to park usage arriong individuals with low incomes. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 12, 79-96.
32. Shaw, S. M., Bonen, A., & McCabe, J. F. (1991). Do more constraints mean less leisure? Examining the relationship between constraints and participation. Journal of Leisure Research, 23, 286-300.
33. Stankey, G. H., & Baden, J. (1977). Rationing wilderness use: Methods, problems and guidelines. Research Paper INT-192. Ogden, UT: USDA Forest Service.
34. rd ed.). New York, NY: Harper Collins.
35. Tian, S., Crompton, J. L., & Witt, P. A. (1996). Integrating constraints and benefits to identify responsive target markets for museum attractions. Journal of Travel Research, 43, 34-45.
36. Willits, W. L., & Willits, F. K. (1986). Adolescent participation in leisure activities: "The less, the more" or "the more, the more"? Leisure Sciences, 8, 189-206.
37. Wright, B. A., & Goodale, T. L. (1991). Beyond non-participation: Validation of interest and frequency of participation categories in constraints research. Journal of Leisure Research, 23, 314-331.
38. Wright, B. A., Rodgers, E. B. D., & Backman, K. F. (2001). Assessing the temporal stability of hunting participation and the structure and intensity of constraints: A panel study, Journal of Leisure Research, 33, 450-469.